Complementary Goods: Creating, Capturing, and Competing for Value

References

• Anderson ET, Dana JD. When is price discrimination profitable? Management Sci. (2009) 55(6):980–989Link, Google Scholar
• Casadesus-Masanell R, Nalebuff B, Yoffie DB. Competing complements. (2007) . NET Institute Working Paper 07-44, Orlando, FLCrossref, Google Scholar
• Chen MK, Nalebuff B. One-way essential complements. (2006) . Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 1588, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
• Cheng LK, Nahm J. Product boundary, vertical competition, and the double mark-up problem. RAND J. Econom. (2007) 38(2):447–466Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou C, Shy O. Network effects without network externalities. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1990) 8(2):259–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cournot A, Bacon N. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth (1927) (Macmillan, New York) . [Orig. pub. 1838 in French]Google Scholar
• Desai PS. Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):265–283Link, Google Scholar
• Economides N. Quality, choice and vertical integration. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1999) 17(6):903–914Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N, Viard VB, Madden G. Pricing of complements and network effects. Regulation and the Economic Performance of Communication and Information Networks (2010) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) 157–190Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Katz M. Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in systems markets. J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(4):413–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J, Whinston MD. Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J. Econom. (1989) 104(2):371–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy KS. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
• NPD Group 2011 total consumer spend on all games content in the U.S. estimated between $16.3 to $16.6 billion. (2012a) . Press release (January 16), NPD Group, Port Washington, NY. https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/pressreleases/pr_120116Google Scholar
• NPD Group U.S. consumer electronics sales reach $144 billion in 2011. (2012b) . Press release (February 13), NPD Group, Port Washington, NY. https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/pressreleases/pr_120213Google Scholar
• Ofek E. Sony PlayStation 3: Game over? (2008) . HBS Case 508076, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Ofek E, Riis J, Hamilton P. Emotiv Systems Inc: It's the thoughts that count. (2009) . HBS Case 510050, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Salant SW. When is inducing self-selection suboptimal for a monopolist? Quart. J. Econom. (1989) 104(2):391–397Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Mohr U, Villas-Boas JM. Competitive product lines with quality constraints. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2008) 6(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A, Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stockey NL. Intertemporal price discrimination. Quart. J. Econom. (1979) 93(3):355–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh RV, Kamakura WA. Optimal bundling and pricing under a monopoly: Contrasting complements and substitutes from independently valued products. J. Bus. (2003) 76(2):211–223Crossref, Google Scholar