Manufacturer and Retailer Strategies to Impact Store Brand Share: Global Integration, Local Adaptation, and Worldwide Learning

References

• Ailawadi KL, Keller KL (2004) Understanding retail branding: Conceptual insights and research priorities J. Retailing 80(4):331–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ailawadi KL, Neslin SA, Gedenk K (2001) Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: Store brands versus national brand promotions. J. Marketing 65(1):71–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ailawadi KL, Pauwels K, Steenkamp J-BEM (2008) Private label use and store loyalty. J. Marketing 72(6):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alba JW (2012) In defense of bumbling. J. Consumer Res. 38(6):981–987.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Apelbaum E, Gerstner E, Naik PA (2003) The effects of expert quality evaluations versus brand name on price premiums. J. Product Brand Management 12(2/3):154–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arndt J (1979) Towards a concept of domesticated markets. J. Marketing 43(4):69–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1995) Empirical generalizations and marketing science: A personal view. Marketing Sci. 14(3, Supplement):G6–G19.Link, Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Steenkamp J-BEM (2001) Response styles in marketing research: A cross-national investigation. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):143–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bijmolt THA, van Heerde HJ, Pieters RGM (2005) New empirical generalizations on the determinants of price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 42(2):141–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Wathieu L (1996) Asymmetric promotion effects and brand positioning. Marketing Sci. 15(4):379–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Burgess SM, Steenkamp J-BEM (2006) Marketing renaissance: How research in emerging consumer markets advances marketing science and practice. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 23(4):337–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri A, Holbrook MB (2001) The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. J. Marketing 65(2):81–93.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheong YF, Fotiu RP, Raudenbush SW (2001) Efficiency and robustness of alternate estimators for two- and three-level models: The case of NAEP. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 26(4):411–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Christen M, Gupta S, Porter JC, Staelin R, Wittink DR (1997) Using market-level data to understand promotion effects in a nonlinear model. J. Marketing Res. 34(3):322–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd ed. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Connor JM, Peterson EB (1992) Market-structure determinants of national brand-private label price differences of manufactured food products. J. Indust. Econom. 40(2):157–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar SK, Hoch SJ (1997) Why store brand penetration varies by retailer. Marketing Sci. 16(3):208–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2004) Unilever: Path to no growth. (September 23) 63.Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Swait J, Valenzuela A (2006) Brands as signals: A cross-country validation study. J. Marketing 70(1):34–49.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Zhao Y, Valenzuela A (2004) Performance of store brands: A cross-country analysis of consumer store-brand preferences, perceptions, and risk. J. Marketing Res. 41(1):86–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farley JU, Lehmann DR (1994) Cross-national “laws” and differences in market response. Management Sci. 40(1):111–122.Link, Google Scholar
• Gates K (2007) Publix kicks off bold PL promotion. Supermarket News (April 23) http://supermarketnews.com/center-store/publix-kicks-bold-pl-promotion.Google Scholar
• Geyskens I, Steenkamp J-BEM, Kumar N (2006) Make, ally, or buy? A meta-analysis of transaction cost theory. Acad. Management J. 49(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• GfK (2007) Between premium and private label—Opportunities for the middle segment? Presentation at the 26th Kronberg Meeting, Kronberg im Taunus, Hesse, Germany.Google Scholar
• Ghemawat P (2007) Redefining Global Strategy (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Gielens K, Steenkamp J-BEM (2007) Drivers of consumer acceptance of new packaged goods: An investigation across products and countries. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 24(2):97–111.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2003) Econometric Analysis 5th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Grewal R, Chandrashekaran M, Dwyer FR (2008) Navigating local environments with global strategies: A contingency model of multinational subsidiary performance. Marketing Sci. 27(5):886–902.Link, Google Scholar
• Hanssens DM, Parsons LJ, Schultz RL (2001) Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analyses, 2nd ed. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Taylor WE (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49(6):1377–1398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ (1996) How should national brands think about private labels? Sloan Management Rev. 37(Winter):89–102.Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Banerji S (1993) When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Rev. 34(Summer):57–67.Google Scholar
• Hofstede G (2001) Culture's Consequences, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Holt DB (2002) Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. J. Consumer Res. 29(1):70–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inglehart R (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Baker WE (2000) Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 65(1):19–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inglehart R, Welzel C (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karp H (2012) Store brands step up their game, and prices. Wall Street Journal (January 31) B1–B2.Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Zoido-Lobaton P (2002) Governance matters II: Updated indicators for 2000–01. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2772, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Kotabe M, Helsen K (2010) Global Marketing Management, 5th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
• Kreft I, de Leeuw J (1998) Introducing Multilevel Modeling (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar N (2003) Kill a brand, keep a customer. Harvard Bus. Rev. 81(12):86–95.Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Steenkamp J-BEM (2007) Private Label Strategy (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Lal R (1990) Price promotions: Limiting competitive encroachment. Marketing Sci. 9(3):247–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Lamey L, Deleersnyder B, Steenkamp J-BEM, Dekimpe MG (2012) The effect of business-cycle fluctuations on private-label share: What has marketing conduct got to do with it? J. Marketing 76(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laurent G, Kapferer J-N (1985) Measuring consumer involvement profiles. J. Marketing Res. 22(1):41–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Licht AN, Goldschmidt C, Schwartz SH (2005) Culture, law and corporate governance. Internat. Rev. Law Econom. 25(2):229–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lipczynski J, Wilson J, Goddard J (2005) Industrial Organization. Competition, Strategy, Policy, 2nd ed. (Financial Times/Prentice Hall, Harlow, UK).Google Scholar
• McCracken G (1986) Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. J. Consumer Res. 13(1):71–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mills DE (1995) Why retailers sell private labels. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(3):509–528.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C, Neslin SA, Sen SK (1996) Promotional elasticities and category characteristics. J. Marketing 60(2):17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neff J (2012) Why some think P&G's innovation is slipping. Advertising Age (February 20) 22.Google Scholar
• Nijs VR, Dekimpe MG, Steenkamp J-BEM, Hanssens DM (2001) The category-demand effects of price promotions. Marketing Sci. 20(1):1–22.Link, Google Scholar
• North DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Palmatier RW, Gopalakrishna S, Houston MB (2006) Returns on business-to-business relationship marketing investments: Strategies for leveraging profits. Marketing Sci. 25(5):477–493.Link, Google Scholar
• Peng MW (2009) Global Strategy, 2nd ed. (South-Western, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Quelch JA, Harding D (1996) Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win. Harvard Bus. Rev. 74(January–February):99–109.Google Scholar
• Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. (Sage, Newbury Park, CA).Google Scholar
• Reibstein DJ, Farris PW (1995) Market share and distribution: A generalization, a speculation, and some implications. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G190–G202.Link, Google Scholar
• Schwartz SH (1994) Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of value. Kim U, Triandis HC, Kagitcibasi C, Choi S-C, Yoon G, eds. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), 85–119.Google Scholar
• Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Scott-Morton FS, Zettelmeyer F (2004) The strategic positioning of store brands in retailer-manufacturer negotiations. Rev. Indust. Organ. 24(2):161–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R (1992) National brand and store brand price competition: Who hurts whom? MSI Working Paper 95-105, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R (2009) Assessing the external validity of analytical results from national brand and store brand competition models. Marketing Sci. 28(4):759–781.Link, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R, Raju JS (2012) Private label strategies—Myths and realities. Venkatesh S, Carpenter GS, eds. Handbook of Marketing Strategy (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK), 318–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel Analysis (Sage, London).Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, de Jong M (2010) A global investigation into the constellation of consumer attitudes toward global and local products. J. Marketing 74(6):18–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, Geyskens I (2006) How country characteristics affect the perceived value of websites. J. Marketing 70(3):136–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, van Heerde H, Geyskens I (2010) What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):1011–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, Nijs V, Hanssens DM, Dekimpe MG (2005) Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion shocks. Marketing Sci. 24(1):35–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Steiner RL (2004) The nature and benefits of national brand/private label competition. Rev. Indust. Organ. 24(2):105–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(2):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Store Brands Decisions (2010) Dearth of CPG innovation helps fuel private label growth. (October 26) http://www.storebrandsdecisions.com/news/2010/10/26/dearth-of-cpg-innovation-helps-fuel-private-label-growth.Google Scholar
• Triandis HC (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psych. Rev. 96(3):506–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Horen F, Pieters R (2012) When high similarity copycats lose and moderate similarity copycats gain: The impact of comparative evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 49(1):83–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson OE (2000) The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. J. Econom. Literature 38(3):595–613.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yip G, Hult GTM (2012) Total Global Strategy, 3rd ed. (Pearson, Boston).Google Scholar
• Zarantonello L, Jedidi K, Schmitt BH (2013) Functional and experiential routes to persuasion: An analysis in emerging versus developed markets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 30(1):46–56.Crossref, Google Scholar