Online Display Advertising: Modeling the Effects of Multiple Creatives and Individual Impression Histories

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0802

References

  • Chatterjee P, Hoffman DL, Novak TP (2003) Modeling the clickstream: Implications for Web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Sci. 22(4):520–541.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drèze X, Hussherr F-X (2003) Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? J. Interactive Marketing 17(4):8–23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dubé J-P, Hitch GJ, Manchanda P (2005) An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(2):107–144.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg FM (1992) Pulsing policies for aggregate advertising models. Marketing Sci. 11(3):221–234.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feinberg FM (2001) On continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response. Management Sci. 47(11):1476–1487.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2003) Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd ed. (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
  • Gittins J, Glazebrook K, Weber R (2011) Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specific error. Econometrics 47(1):153–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Interactive Advertising Bureau (2011) IAD Internet advertising revenue report. Report, IAB, New York. http:www.iab.net/media/file/IAB_Full_year_2010_0413_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Little JDC (1979) Aggregate advertising models—The state of the art. Oper. Res. 27(4):629–667.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lodish LM, Abraham MM, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995) A summary of fifty-five in-market experimental estimates of the long-term effect of TV advertising. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G133–G140.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V, Muller E (1986) Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Marketing Sci. 5(2):89–106.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Dubé JP, Goh KY, Chintagunta PK (2006) The effect of banner advertising on Internet purchasing. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):98–108.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison DG, Schmittlein DC (1981) Predicting future random events based on past performance. Management Sci. 27(9):1006–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naik PA, Mantrala MK, Sawyer AG (1998) Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. 17(3):214–235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nerlove M, Arrow KJ (1962) Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica 29(114):129–142.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pechmann C, Stewart DW (1990) Advertising repetition: A critical review of wear-in and wear-out. MSI Report 90-106, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE (2011) From generic to branded: A model of spillover in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):87–102.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tellis GJ (2009) Generalizations about advertising effectiveness in markets. J. Advertising Res. 49(2):240–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vakratsas D, Feinberg FM, Bass FM, Kalyanaram G (2004) The shape of advertising response functions revisited: A model of dynamic probabilistic thresholds. Marketing Sci. 23(1):109–119.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winkelmann R (2008) Econometrics Analysis of Count Data (Springer, Berlin).Google Scholar
  • Ying Y, Feinberg F, Wedel M (2006) Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):355–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.