The Dynamic Effects of Bundling as a Product Strategy

References

• Ackerberg DA, Rysman M (2005) Unobserved product differentiation in discrete-choice models: Estimating price elasticities and welfare effects. RAND J. Econom. 36(4):771–788.Google Scholar
• Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amelio A, Jullien B (2012) Tying and freebies in two-sided markets. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(5):436–446.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M, Vickers J (2010) Competitive non-linear pricing and bundling. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(1):30–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E (1999) Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. 45(12):1613–1630.Link, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caillaud B, Julien B (2003) Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. 34(2):309–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carranza JE (2010) Product innovation and adoption in market equilibrium: The case of digital cameras. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 59(8):1904–1926.Google Scholar
• Chao Y, Derdenger T (2013) Mixed bundling in two-sided markets in the presence of installed base effects. Management Sci. 59(8):1904–1926.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Riordan MH (2013) Profitability of product bundling. Internat. Econom. Rev. 54(1):35–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crawford GS (2008) The discriminatory incentives to bundle in the cable television industry. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(1):41–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-PH, Hitsch GJ, Chintagunta PK (2010) Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects. Marketing Sci. 29(2):216–249.Link, Google Scholar
• Elberse A (2010) Bye-bye bundles: The unbundling of music in digital channels. J. Marketing 74(3):107–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang H, Norman P (2006) To bundle or not to bundle. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):946–963.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR (2009) A dynamic model of consumer replacement cycles in the PC processor industry. Marketing Sci. 28(5):846–867.Link, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Rysman M (2012) Dynamics of consumer demand for new durable goods. J. Political Econom. 120(6):1173–1219.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gowrisankaran G, Park M, Rysman M (2010) Measuring network effects in a dynamic environment. NET Institute Working Paper 10-03, New York University, New York.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagiu A (2006) Pricing and commitment by two-sided platforms. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):720–737.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair HS (2010) Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. 29(2):366–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer inventory behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Ching A (2012) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Rotman School of Management Working Paper 2189871, University of Toronto, Toronto. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2189871.Google Scholar
• Kaiser U, Wright J (2006) Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 24(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kobayashi BH (2005) Does economics provide a reliable guide to regulating commodity bundling by firms? A survey of the economic literature. J. Competition Law Econom. 1(4):707–746.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee RS (2013) Vertical integration and exclusivity in platform and two-sided markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mariuzzo F, Walsh PP, Whelan C (2010) Coverage of retail stores and discrete choice models of demand: Estimating price elasticities and welfare effects. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 28(5):555–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee RP, McMillan J, Whinston MD (1989) Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quart. J. Econom. 104(2):371–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melnikov O (2013) Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the US computer printer market. Econom. Inquiry 51(2):1277–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H (2007) Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Application to the US market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(3):239–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Chintagunta P, Dubé J-P (2004) Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):23–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nalebuff B (2004) Bundling as an entry barrier. Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):159–187.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Venkatesh R, Mahajan V (2010) Optimal bundling of technological products with network externality. Management Sci. 56(12):2224–2236.Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet JC, Tirole J (2006) Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):645–667.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rysman M (2004) Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):483–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiraldi P (2011) Automobile replacement: A dynamic structural approach. RAND J. Econom. 42(2):266–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmalensee R (1984) Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. J. Bus. 57(1):211–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharpe KM, Staelin R (2010) Consumption effects of bundling: Consumer perceptions, firm actions, and public policy implications. J. Public Policy Marketing 29(2):170–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skrainka BS, Judd KL (2011) High performance quadrature rules: How numerical integration affects a popular model of product differentiation. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Stremersch S (2002) Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. J. Marketing 66(1):55–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh R, Mahajan V (2009) The design and pricing of bundles: A review of normative guidelines and practical approaches. Rao VR, ed. Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA), 232–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas SB (2007) Vertical relationships between manufacturers and retailers: Inference with limited data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 74(2):625–652.Crossref, Google Scholar