Persuasive Puffery

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0826

References

  • Abernethy AM, Franke GR (1996) The information content of advertising: A meta-analysis. J. Advertising 25(2):1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B, Shachar R (2009) Targeted advertising as a signal. Quant. Marketing Econom. 7(3):237–266.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B, Shachar R (2011) Advertising, the matchmaker. RAND J. Econom. 42(2):205–245.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, Renault R (2006) Advertising content. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(1):93–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson SP, Renault R (2009) Comparative advertising: Disclosing horizontal match information. RAND J. Econom. 40(3):558–581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S, Ellison G (2011) Position auctions with consumer search. Quart. J. Econom. 126(3):1213–1270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagwell K, Ramey G (1993) Advertising as information: Matching products to buyers. J. Econom. Management Strategy 2(2):199–243.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barigozzi F, Garella PG, Peitz M (2009) With a little help from my enemy: Comparative advertising as a signal of quality. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(4):1071–1094.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battaglini M (2002) Multiple referrals and multidimensional cheap talk. Econometrica 70(4):1379–1401.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackwell D (1953) Equivalent comparisons of experiments. Ann. Math. Statist. 24(2):265–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty A, Harbaugh R (2003) Cheap talk comparisons in multi-issue bargaining. Econom. Lett. 78(1):357–363.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty A, Harbaugh R (2007) Comparative cheap talk. J. Econom. Theory 132(1):70–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty A, Harbaugh R (2010) Persuasion by cheap talk. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(5):2361–2382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakraborty A, Gupta N, Harbaugh R (2006) Best foot forward or best for last in a sequential auction? RAND J. Econom. 37(1):176–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Che Y-K, Dessein W, Kartik N (2013) Pandering to persuade. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(1):47–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, He C (2011) Paid placement: Advertising and search on the internet. Econom. J. 121(556):309–328.Google Scholar
  • Crawford VP, Sobel J (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6):1431–1450.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowley AE, Hoyer WD (1994) An integrative framework for understanding two-sided persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 20(4):561–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crutzen BSY, Swank OH, Visser B (2013) Confidence management: On interpersonal comparisons in teams. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(4):744–767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Emons W, Fluet C (2012) Non-comparative versus comparative advertising of quality. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(4):352–360.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J, Gibbons R (1989) Cheap talk with two audiences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(5):1214–1223.Google Scholar
  • Federal Trade Commission (1979) Statement of policy regarding comparative advertising. Statement, FTC, Washington, DC. http://www.ftc.gov/statement-of-policy-regarding-comparative-advertising.Google Scholar
  • Gardete PM (2013) Cheap-talk advertising and misrepresentation in vertically differentiated markets. Marketing Sci. 32(4):609–621.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2011) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal D, Kavanoor S, Fern EF, Costley C, Barnes J (1997) Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: A meta-analysis. J. Marketing 61(4):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gu Z, Xie Y (2013) Facilitating fit revelation in the competitive market. Management Sci. 59(5):1196–1212.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman DA (2006) The best puffery article ever. Iowa Law Rev. 91(5):101–140.Google Scholar
  • Hoffman F, Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2013) Hypertargeting, limited attention, and privacy: Implications for marketing and campaigning. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
  • Hovland CI, Lumsdaine AA, Sheffield FD (1949) Experiments on Mass Communication (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2009) Misselling through agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):883–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2012) Competition through commissions and kickbacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):780–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain SP, Posovac SS (2004) Valenced comparisons. J. Marketing Res. 41(1):46–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson JP, Myatt DP (2006) On the simple economics of advertising, marketing, and product design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):756–784.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson RD, Levin IP (1985) More than meets the eye: The effects of missing information on purchase evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 12(2):169–177.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalra A, Li S (2008) Signaling quality through specialization. Marketing Sci. 27(2):168–184.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kamins MA, Marks LJ (1987) The impact of using two-sided claims on product attitude and purchase intention. J. Advertising 16(4):6–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kardes FR, Posavac SS, Cronley ML (2004) Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. J. Consumer Psych. 14(3):230–256.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kartik N (2009) Strategic communication with lying costs. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(4):1359–1395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koessler F, Renault R (2012) When does a firm disclose product information? RAND J. Econom. 43(4):630–649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis T, Sappington D (1994) Supplying information to facilitate price discrimination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 35(2):305–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. 25(2):155–163.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Shin J (2011) Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Marketing Sci. 30(4):666–685.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier JA (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. Forthcoming.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer RJ (1981) A model of multiattribute judgments under attribute uncertainty and information constraint. J. Marketing Res. 18(4):428–441.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Price and advertising signals of product quality. J. Political Econom. 94(4):796–821.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. 82(4):729–754.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ottaviani M, Sørensen PN (2006) Reputational cheap talk. RAND J. Econom. 37(1):155–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parmentier RJ (1994) Signs in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology (Indiana University Press, Bloomington).Google Scholar
  • Pechmann C, Stewart DW (1991) How direct comparative ads and market share affect brand choice. J. Advertising Res. 31(6):47–55.Google Scholar
  • Prékopa A (1973) On logarithmic concave measures and functions. Acta Sci. Math. 34:335–343.Google Scholar
  • Preston IL (1996) The Great American Blow-up: Puffery in Advertising and Selling (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison).Google Scholar
  • Reeves R (1961) Reality in Advertising (Knopf, New York).Google Scholar
  • Resnik A, Stern BL (1977) An analysis of information content in television advertising. J. Marketing 41(1):50–53.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel J (1985) A theory of credibility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 52(4):557–573.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart DW, Furse DH (1986) Effective Television Advertising: A Study of 1000 Commercials (Lexington Books, Lanham, MD).Google Scholar
  • Sun M (2011) Disclosing multiple product attributes. J. Econom. Management Strategy 20(1):195–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.