Modeling Indivisible Demand

References

• Ailawadi KL, Gedenk K, Lutzky C, Neslin SA (2007) Decomposition of the sales impact of promotion-induced stockpiling. J. Marketing Res. 44(3):450–467.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Shively TS, Yang S, Garratt MJ (2004) A choice model for packaged goods: Dealing with discrete quantities and quantity discounts. Marketing Sci. 23(1):95–108.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (2004) Long-run effects of promotion depth on new versus established customers: Three field studies. Marketing Sci. 23(1):4–20.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora N, Allenby GM, Ginter JL (1998) A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Marketing Sci. 17(1):29–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Beviá C, Quinzii M, Silva JA (1999) Buying several indivisible goods. Math. Social Sci. 37(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhat CR (2005) A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: Formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Transportation Res. 39(8):679–707.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhat CR (2008) The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Transportation Res. 42(3):274–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow ET, Zaslavsky AM (1999) A hierarchical latent variable model for ordinal data from a customer satisfaction survey with “no answer” responses. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94(445):43–52.Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kruger MW, Mela CF (2008) The IRI marketing data set. Marketing Sci. 27(4):745–748.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandukala S, Kim J, Otter T, Rossi P, Allenby G (2007) Choice models in marketing: Economic assumptions, challenges and trends. Foundations Trends Marketing 2(2):97–184.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang J (1991) A simultaneous approach to the whether, what, and how much to buy questions. Marketing Sci. 10(4):297–315.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Nair HS (2011) Discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(6):977–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta P, Erdem T, Rossi PE, Wedel M (2006) Structural modeling in marketing: Review and assessment. Marketing Sci. 25(6):604–616.Link, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Smith MS (2011) Modeling multivariate distributions using copulas: Application in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
• Danilov V, Koshevoy G, Murota K (2001) Discrete convexity and equilibria in economies with indivisible goods and money. Math. Soc. Sci. 41(3):251–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P (2004) Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. 23(1):66–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Greene WH (2002) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Gupta S (1988) Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. 25(4):342–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann WM (1984) Discrete/continuous models of consumer demands. Econometrica 52(3):541–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inoue T (2009) Indivisible commodities and an equivalence theorem on the strong core. IMW Working Paper 417, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.Google Scholar
• Kalyanam K, Putler DS (1997) Incorporating demographic variables in brand choice models: An indivisible alternatives framework. Marketing Sci. 16(2):166–181.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Allenby GM, Rossi PE (2002) Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21(3):229–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuriyama K, Hanemann WM (2006) The integer programming approach to a generalized corner-solution model: An application to recreation demand. Working paper, Waseda University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim J, Allenby GM (2013) A direct utility model for asymmetric complements. Marketing Sci. 32(3):454–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Rossi PE, Chintagunta PK (2004) Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):467–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N (2007) Investigating consumers' purchase incidence and brand choice decisions across multiple product categories: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 26(2):196–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Nair H, Dubé J-P, Chintagunta P (2005) Accounting for primary and secondary demand effects with aggregate data. Marketing Sci. 24(3):444–460.Link, Google Scholar
• Pakes A, Porter J, Ho K, Ishii J (2011) Moment inequalities and their application. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Allenby GM, McCulloch R (2005) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, Gilula Z, Allenby GM (2001) Overcoming scale usage heterogeneity: A Bayesian hierarchical approach. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96(453):20–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satomura T, Kim J, Allenby GM (2011) Multiple-constraint choice models with corner and interior solutions. Marketing Sci. 30(3):481–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Small KA, Rosen HS (1981) Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 49(1):105–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Song I, Chintagunta PK (2007) A discrete-continuous model for multicategory purchase behavior of households. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):595–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanner MA, Wong WH (1987) The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82(398):528–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wales TJ, Woodland AD (1983) Estimation of consumer demand systems with binding non-negativity constraints. J. Econometrics 21(3):263–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolsey LA (1998) Integer Programming, Wiley Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, Vol. 52 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R, Lenk P (2006) Bayesian estimation of multivariate-normal models when dimensions are absent. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(3):241–265.Crossref, Google Scholar