Learning About New Technologies Through Social Networks: Experimental Evidence on Nontraditional Stoves in Bangladesh

References

• Abrahamson E (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Acad. Management Rev. 16(3):586–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1993) Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Acad. Management Rev. 18(3):487–517.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abrahamson E, Rosenkopf L (1997) Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. 8(3):289–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9):1082–1095.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S, Muchnik L, Sundararajan A (2009) Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(51):21544–21549.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Beaman L (2012) Social networks and the dynamics of labour market outcomes: Evidence from refugees resettled in the U.S. Rev. Econom. Stud. 79(1):128–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Song S (2007) Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(4):361–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bemmaor AC (1994) Modeling the diffusion of new durable goods: Word-of-mouth effect versus consumer heterogeneity. Laurent G, Lilien GL, Pras B, eds. Research Traditions in Marketing (Springer, Amsterdam), 201–229.Google Scholar
• Bensch G, Peters J (2012) A recipe for success? Randomized free distribution of improved cooking stoves in Senegal. Working paper, Rhine-Westphalia Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2030746.Google Scholar
• BenYishay A, Mobarak AM (2013) Communicating with farmers through social networks. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J (2010) What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1):263–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beshears J, Choi JJ, Laibson D, Madrian BC, Milkman KL (2011) The effect of providing peer information on retirement savings decisions. NBER Working Paper 17345, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black W (1983) Discontinuance and diffusion: Examination of the post adoption decision process. Adv. Consumer Res. 10:356–361.Google Scholar
• Bobonis GJ, Finan F (2009) Neighborhood peer effects in secondary school enrollment decisions. Rev. Econom. Statist. 91(4):695–716.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond TC, Streets DG, Yarber KF, Nelson SM, Woo J-H, Klimont Z (2004) A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres 109:D14203. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2003JD003697/abstract.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bursztyn L, Ederer F, Ferman B, Yuchtman N (2013) Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: Evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2101391.Google Scholar
• Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. 92(6):1287–1335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carrell SE, Hoekstra ML (2010) Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(1):211–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charlett D, Garland R, Marr N (1995) How damaging is negative word of mouth. Marketing Bull. 6(1):42–50.Google Scholar
• Chay KY, Greenstone M (2003) The impact of air pollution on infant mortality: Evidence from geographic variation in pollution shocks induced by a recession. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1121–1167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H (1957) The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20(4):253–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Udry CR (2010) Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):35–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi G, Pellizzari M, Redaelli S (2010) Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(2):241–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Saez E (2003) The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):815–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Dupas P, Kremer M (2011) Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impact of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feder G, Savastano S (2006) The role of opinion leaders in the diffusion of new knowledge: The case of integrated pest management. World Development 34(7):1287–1300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandez I, Bowen S, Gay C (2003) HIV, sex, and social change: Applying ESID principles to HIV prevention research. Amer. J. Community Psych. 32(3/4):333–344.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster AD, Rosenzweig MR (1995) Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. J. Political Econom. 103(6):1176–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garlick R (2013) Academic peer effects with different group assignment rules: Residential tracking versus random assignment. Working paper, World Bank Development Research Group, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godlonton S, Thornton R (2012) Peer effects in learning HIV results. J. Development Econom. 97(1):118–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greve HR (1995) Jumping ship: The diffusion of strategy abandonment. Admin. Sci. Quart. 40(3):444–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanna R, Duflo E, Greenstone M (2012) Up in smoke: The influence of household behavior on the long-run impact of improved cooking stoves. NBER Working Paper 18033, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w18033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair H, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C (2008) Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 19(3/4):287–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamali A, Quigley M, Nakiyingi J, Kinsman J, Kengeya Kayondo J, Gopal R, Ojwiya A, Hughes P, Carpenter LM, Whitworth J (2003) Syndromic management of sexually-transmitted infections and behaviour change interventions on transmission of HIV-1 in rural Uganda: A community randomised trial. Lancet 361(9358):645–652.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Miguel E (2007) The illusion of sustainability. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1007–1065.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Miguel E, Mullainathan S, Null C, Zwane AP (2009) How to get safe water: Persuasion, peers, price, promoters, or product? Amer. J. Tropical Med. Hygiene 81(5):305–306.Google Scholar
• Kremer M, Mullainathan S, Zwane AP, Miguel E, Null C (2011) Social engineering: Evidence from a suite of take-up experiments in Kenya. Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~emiguel/pdfs/miguel_chlorinedispensers.pdf.Google Scholar
• Laczniak RN, DeCarlo TE, Ramaswami SN (2001) Consumers’ responses to negative word-of-mouth communication: An attribution theory perspective. J. Consumer Psych. 11(1):57–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D (1985) Experts as negative opinion leaders in the diffusion of a technological innovation. J. Consumer Res. 11(4):914–926.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luby S, Mendoza C, Keswick B, Chiller TM, Hoekstra R (2008) Difficulties in bringing point-of-use water treatment to scale in rural Guatemala. Amer. J. Tropical Medicine Hygiene 78(3):382–387.Google Scholar
• Luoto J, Levine D, Albert J (2011) Information and persuasion: Achieving safe water behaviors in Kenya. RAND Working Paper WR-885, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1980292.Google Scholar
• Magruder JR (2010) Intergenerational networks, unemployment, and persistent inequality in South Africa. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(1):62–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsden PV, Podolny J (1990) Dynamic analysis of network diffusion processes. Weesie J, Flap H, eds. Social Networks Through Time (ISOR/University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands),197–214.Google Scholar
• Martinez-Donate A, Hovell M, Zellner J, Sipan C, Blumberg E, Carrizosa C (2004) Evaluation of two school-based HIV prevention interventions in the border city of Tijuana, Mexico. J. Sex Res. 41(3):267–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Midgley DF (1976) A simple mathematical theory of innovative behavior. J. Consumer Res. 3(1):31–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller G, Mobarak AM (2013) Gender differences in preferences, intra-household externalities, and low demand for improved cookstoves. NBER Working Paper 18964, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobarak AM, Dwivedi P, Bailis R, Hildemann L, Miller G (2012) Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(27):10815–10820.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Munshi K (2004) Social learning in a heterogeneous population: Technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution. J. Development Econom. 73(1):185–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nair HS, Manchanda P, Bhatia T (2010) Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. 47(5):883–895.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2010) The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mouth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. 29(4):690–700.Link, Google Scholar
• National Institute of Population Research and Training (2009) Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2007. Report, National Institute of Population Research and Training, Dhaka, Bangladesh. http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR207/FR207%5BApril-10-2009%5D.pdf.Google Scholar
• Oster E, Thornton R (2011) Menstruation, sanitary products, and school attendance: Evidence from a randomized evaluation. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 3(1):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmer B (2012) “Clean cookstoves” draw support, but they may not improve indoor air quality. Washington Post (April 16) http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/clean-cookstoves-draw-support-but-they-may-not-improve-indoor-air-quality/2012/04/16/gIQAnjCvLT_story.html.Google Scholar
• Ramanathan V, Carmichael G (2008) Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nature Geosci. 1(4):221–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Richins ML (1983) Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. J. Marketing 47(1):68–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rosenthal E (2009) Third-world stove soot is target in climate fight. New York Times (April 15). http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/16/science/earth/16degrees.html.Google Scholar
• Saltiel J, Bauder J, Palakovich S (1994) Adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: Diffusion, farm structure, and profitability. Rural Sociol. 59(2):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarkar M, Akter N, Rahman M (2006) Assessment of existing improved cook stove in Bangladesh. BRAC research report, BRAC, Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
• Shalizi CR, Thomas AC (2011) Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociol. Methods Res. 40(2):211–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith KR, Dutta K (2011) Cooking with gas. Energy Sustainable Development 15(2):115–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith-Sivertsen T, Diaz E, Pope D, Lie RT, Diaz A, McCracken J, Bakke P, Arana B, Smith KR, Bruce N (2009) Effect of reducing indoor air pollution on womens’ respiratory symptoms and lung function: The RESPIRE randomized trial, Guatemala. Amer. J. Epidemiol. 170(2):211–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen AT (2006) Social learning and health plan choice. RAND J. Econom. 37(4):929–945.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strang D, Tuma NB (1993) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in diffusion. Amer. J. Sociol. 99(3):614–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente TW, Saba WP (1998) Mass media and interpersonal influence in a reproductive health communication campaign in Bolivia. Comm. Res. 25(1):96–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valente TW, Saba WP (2001) Campaign exposure and interpersonal communication as factors in contraceptive use in Bolivia. J. Health Comm. 6(4):303–322.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Lilien GL (2001) Medical innovation revisited. Social contagion versus marketing effort. Amer. J. Sociol. 106(5):1409–1435.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weimann G, Tustin DH, van Vuuren D, Joubert JPR (2007) Looking for opinion leaders: Traditional vs. modern measures in traditional societies. Internat. J. Public Opinion Res. 19(2):173–190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• World Bank (2010) Improved cookstoves and better health in Bangladesh: Lessons from household energy and sanitation programs. Report, World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.hedconsulting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/improved_cookstoves_better_health.pdf.Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2002) The World Health Report 2002—Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Report, World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar