The Bright Side of Loss Aversion in Dynamic and Competitive Markets

References

• Bell D, Bucklin R (1999) The role of internal reference price in the category purchase decision. J. Consumer Res. 26(2):128–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Lattin JM (2000) Looking for loss aversion in scanner panel data: Confounding effect of price-response heterogeneity. Marketing Sci. 19(2):185–200.Link, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S, Thaler RH (1995) Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. 110(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Blair EA (1991) Contextual effects of reference price in retail advertisements. J. Marketing 55(July):1–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton L, Warlop L, Alba J (2003) Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. J. Consumer Res. 29(4):474–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briesch R, Krishnamurthi L, Mazumdar T, Raj SP (1997) A comparative analysis of reference price models. J. Consumer Res. 24(2):202–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Farber HS (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg FM, Krishna A, Zhang ZJ (2002) Do we care what others get? A behaviorist approach to targeted promotions. J. Marketing Res. 39(3):277–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galanter E, Pliner P (1974) Cross-modality matching of money against other continua. Moskowitz HR, Scharf B, Stevens JC, eds. Sensation and Measurement (Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands), 65–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenleaf E (1995) The impact of reference price effects on the profitability of price promotions. Marketing Sci. 14(1):82–104.Link, Google Scholar
• Grewal D, Monroe K, Krishnan R (1998) The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. J. Marketing 62(2):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gul F (1991) A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica 59(3):667–686.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hardie BGS, Johnson EJ, Fader PS (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Heidhues P, Kőszegi B (2008) Competition and price variation when consumers are loss averse. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1245–1268.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational consumers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Lim N, Camerer CF (2006) Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics. J. Marketing Res. 43(4):307–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho TH, Lim N, Cui TH (2010) Reference dependence in multilocation newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong H, Shum M (2006) Using price distributions to estimate search costs. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):257–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honka E (2010) Quantifying search and switching costs in the U.S. auto insurance industry. Working paper, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas.Google Scholar
• Jeuland A, Narasimhan C (1985) Dealing-temporary price cuts-by seller as a buyer discrimination mechanism. J. Bus. 58(3):295–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalwani M, Yim C (1992) Consumer price and promotion expectations: An experimental study. J. Marketing Res. 29(February):90–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanaram G, Winer RS (1995) Empirical generalization from reference price research. Marketing Sci. 14(3, Supplement):G161–G169.Link, Google Scholar
• Kopalle PK, Rao AG, Assunção JL (1996) Asymmetric reference price effects and dynamic pricing policies. Marketing Sci. 15(1):60–85.Link, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2009) Reference-dependent consumption plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):909–936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi L, Mazumdar T, Raj SP (1992) Asymmetric response to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. J. Consumer Res. 19(3):387–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R (1990) Price promotions: Limiting competitive encroachment. Marketing Sci. 9(3):247–262.Link, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Little JDC, Villas-Boas JM (1996) A theory of forward-buying, merchandising, and trade deals. Marketing Sci. 15(1):21–37.Link, Google Scholar
• Lattin J, Bucklin R (1989) Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):299–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch JG Jr, Ariely D (2000) Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Sci. 19(1):83–103.Link, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H (1952) The utility of wealth. J. Political Econom. 60(2): 151–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I (2005) Reference price research: Review and propositions. J. Marketing 69(4):84–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moraga-Gonzalez J, Wildenbeest M (2008) Maximum likelihood estimation of search costs. Eur. Econom. Rev. 52(5):820–848.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C (1988) Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. 61(4):427–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C, Turut Ö (2013) Differentiate or imitate? The role of context-dependent preferences. Marketing Sci. 32(3):393–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C, He C, Anderson E, Brenner L, Desai P, Kuksov D, Messinger Pet al. (2005) Incorporating behavioral anomalies in strategic models. Marketing Lett. 16(3):361–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orhun AY (2009) Optimal product line design when consumers exhibit choice set-dependent preferences. Marketing Sci. 28(5):868–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Putler DS (1992) Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 11(3):287–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Rajendran KN, Tellis G (1994) Contextual and temporal components of reference price. J. Marketing 58(1):22–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao RC (1991) Pricing and promotions in asymmetric duopolies. Marketing Sci. 10(2):131–144.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith G, Venkatraman M, Dholakia R (1999) Diagnosing the search cost effect: Waiting time and the moderating impact of prior category knowledge. J. Econom. Psych. 20(3):285–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahl D (1989) Oligopolistic pricing with sequential consumer search. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(4):700–712.Google Scholar
• Streitfeld D (2000) Amazon flunks its pricing test/sliding costs anger shoppers. San Francisco Chronicle (September 28), B-4.Google Scholar
• Thaler R (1985) Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. 4(3):199–214.Link, Google Scholar
• Varian H (1980) A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(4):651–659.Google Scholar
• Winer R (1986) A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):250–256.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wingfield N, Stelter B (2011) How Netflix lost 800,000 members, and good will. New York Times (October 24), http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/technology/netflix-lost-800000-members-with-price-rise-and-split-plan.html.Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R, Thomadsen R (2013) Vertical differentiation with variety-seeking consumers. Management Sci. 59(2):390–401.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou J (2011) Reference dependence and market competition. J. Econom. Management Strategy 20(4):1073–1097.Crossref, Google Scholar