Invited Paper—Even the Rich Can Make Themselves Poor: A Critical Examination of IV Methods in Marketing Applications

References

• Ackerberg D, Benkard CL, Berry S, Pakes A (2007) Econometric tools for analyzing market outcomes. Heckman J, Leamer E, eds. Handbook of Econometrics (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 4172–4271.Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Rossi PE (1999) Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J. Econometrics 89(1):57–78.Google Scholar
• Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A simultaneous equation study of advertising and sales of cigarettes. J. Marketing Res. 6(3):291–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Nair H (2011) Discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(6):977–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Dubé J-P, Goh KY (2005) Beyond the endogeneity bias: The effect of unmeasured brand characteristics on household level brand choice models. Management Sci. 51(5):832–849.Link, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Hansen CB, Rossi PE (2012) Plausibly exogenous. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(1):260–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J, Hitsch G, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3): 417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Imai S, Keane MP (2003) Brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen C, Hausman J, Newey W (2008) Estimation with many instrumental variables. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 26(4):398–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman J (1996) The valuation of new goods under perfect and imperfect competition. Bresnahan T, Gordon R, eds. The Economics of New Goods, Vol. 58 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 209–237.Google Scholar
• Hayashi F (2000) Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Rossi PE, Chintagunta PK (2004) Response modeling with nonrandom marketing-mix variables. J. Marketing Res. 41(November):467–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreira MJ (2003) A conditional likelihood ratio test for structural models. Econometrica 71(4):1027–1048.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Nair H (2013) Estimating causal installed-base effects: A bias-correction approach. J. Marketing Res. 50(1):70–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) Control function corrections for unobserved factors in differentiated product models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1): 3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH (2000) GMM with weak identification. Econometrica 68(5):1055–1096.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 20(4):518–529.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM, Winer RS (1999) Endogeneity in brand choice models. Management Sci. 45(10):1324–1338.Link, Google Scholar
• Woolridge JM (2010) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar