Synergy or Interference: The Effect of Product Placement on Commercial Break Audience Decline

References

• Andrade EB, Ariely D (2009) The enduring impact of transient emotions on decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 109(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkinson C (2007) Soon, you could know how many see your spots (really!). Advertising Age. Accessed July 2, 2014, http://adage.com/abstract.php?article_id=115633.Google Scholar
• Atkinson C (2008) How ad ratings changed the $70B TV market. Advertising Age Ad-Ratings White Paper. Accessed July 2, 2014, http://adage.com/images/random/0908/Ad-Ratings%20White%20Paper.pdf.Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian SK, Karrh JA, Patwardhan H (2006) Audience response to placements—An integrative framework and future research agenda. J. Advertising 35(3):115–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard J (2011) Buying product placement? Options and prices, pros and cons. MediaTel (April 12). Accessed July 2, 2014, http://mediatel.co.uk/newsline/2011/04/12/buying-product-placement-options-prices-pros-cons/.Google Scholar
• Bartlett T (2013) Power of suggestion. Chronicle Higher Ed. (January 30). Accessed July 2, 2014, http://chronicle.com/article/Power-of-Suggestion/136907/.Google Scholar
• Bradlow ET, Schmittlein DC (2000) The little engines that could: Modeling the performance of world wide web search engines. Marketing Sci. 19(1):43–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Briggs R, Stuart G (2006) What Sticks (Kaplan Publishing, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dube J-P, Mela CF (2010) Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. 47(6):998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruner JS (1957) On perceptual readiness. Psych. Rev. 64(January):123–152.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke RR, Srull TK (1988) Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. J. Consumer Res. 15(1):55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chartrand TL, Huber J, Shiv B, Tanner RJ (2008) Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. J. Consumer Res. 35(2):189–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen JB, Andrade EB (2004) Affective intuition and task-contingent affect regulation. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):358–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowley E, Barron C (2008) When placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. J. Advertising 37(1):89–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ (1995) What happens to television ratings during ad breaks. J. Advertising Res. 35(1):37–47.Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Dagger TS (2012) Using a nested logit model to forecast television ratings. Internat. J. Forecasting 28(3):607–622.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Bonfrer A, Dhar S (2008) The effect of competitive advertising interference on sales for packaged goods. J. Marketing Res. 45(2):211–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Dagger TS, Smith MS (2011) Forecasting television ratings. Internat. J. Forecasting 27(4):1215–1240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eggerton J (2006) More spot bucks board brandwagon. Broadcasting Cable (April 19), Accessed July 2, 2014, http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/103763-More_Spot_Bucks_Board_Brandwagon.php.Google Scholar
• Friestad M, Wright P (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta PB, Lord KR (1998) Placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. J. Current Issues Res. Advertising 20(1):47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET, Rholes WS, Jones CR (1977) Category accessibility and impression formation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 13(2):141–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kantar Media (2014) Kantar media reports U.S. advertising expenditures increased 0.9 percent in 2013, fueled by large advertisers. Accessed July 2, 2014, http://kantarmedia.us/press/kantar-media-reports-us-advertising-expenditures-increase-09-percent-2013.Google Scholar
• Karniouchina EV, Uslay C, Erenburg G (2011) Do marketing media have life cycles? The case of placement in movies. J. Marketing 75(May):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller KL, Lehmann DR (2006) Brands and branding: Research findings and future priorities. Marketing Sci. 25(6):740–759.Link, Google Scholar
• Kent RJ, Allen CT (1994) Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. J. Marketing 58(3):97–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kent RJ, Schweidel DA (2011) Introducing the Ad ECG: How the set-top box tracks the lifeline of television. J. Advertising Res. 51(4):586–593.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law S, Braun KA (2000) I'll have what she's having: Gauging the impact of placements on viewers. Psych. Marketing 17(12):1059–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2014) How TV ads influence online shopping. Working paper, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Magna Global (2013) Magna global advertising forecasts: 2014. Accessed July 2, 2014, http://news.magnaglobal.com/ipgmediabrands/press-releases/magna-global-advertising-forecast-2014-ipg-mediabrands.htm.Google Scholar
• McCracken G (1989) Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. J. Consumer Res. 16(3):310–321.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moses H, Bryant L, Sylvester K (2004) Placement as a marketing tool in film and television. National Soc. Sci. J. 22(1):76–87.Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Raman K (2003) Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. 13(4):375–388.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Guinn TC, Shrum LJ (1997) The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. J. Consumer Res. 23(4):278–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reber R, Winkielman P, Schwarz N (1998) Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psych. Sci. 9(1):45–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell C (2002) Investigating the effectiveness of placements in TV shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. J. Consumer Res. 29(3):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell C, Belch M (2005) A managerial investigation into the placement industry. J. Advertising Res. 45(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell G, Peterson A (2000) Analysis of cross category dependence in market basket selection. J. Retailing 76(3):367–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Kent RJ (2010) Predictors of the gap between program and ad audiences: An investigation using live tuning data. J. Marketing 74(3):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Bradlow ET, Williams P (2006) A feature-based approach to assessing advertisement similarity. J. Marketing Res. 43(2):237–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah JY, Kruglanski AW (2002) Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit? J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 38(4):368–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siddarth S, Chattopadhyay A (1998) To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during ads. Marketing Sci. 17(2):124–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Wedel M, Pieters R (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV ads: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Meurs L (1998) Zapp! A study on switching behavior during ad breaks. J. Advertising Res. 38(1):43–53.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008a) How the digital video recorder changes traditional TV advertising. J. Advertising 37(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008b) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kemoe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Woltman Elpers JLCM, Wedel M, Pieters RGM (2003) Why do consumers stop viewing TV ads? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zajonc RB (1968) Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 9(2):1–27.Crossref, Google Scholar