Usage Experience with Decision Aids and Evolution of Online Purchase Behavior
Published Online:21 Jul 2014https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2014.0872
References
- (1997) Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. J. Marketing 61(3):38–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Do computers sweat? The impact of perceived effort of online decision aids on consumers' satisfaction with the decision process. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1):139–148.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Shopping lists as an external memory aid for grocery shopping: Influences on list writing and list fulfillment. J. Consumer Psych. 8(4):343–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) The role of consumers' intuitions in inference making. J. Consumer Res. 21(3):393–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) A comparison of online and offline consumer brand loyalty. Marketing Sci. 22(4):461–476.Link, Google Scholar
- (2000) Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: The effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 17(1):55–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Automated choice heuristics. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D, eds. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 548–558.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psych. Rev. 109(1):75–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Hartman Group (2013) The online grocery shopper report. (The Hartman Group, Inc., Bellevue, WA), 1–5. http://www.hartman-group.com/downloads/online-grocery-shopper-report-product-sheet-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2000) Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Sci. 19(1):4–21.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Shopping with other people's money: The marketing management implications of surrogate-mediated consumer decision making. J. Marketing 63(2):102–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. J. Consumer Res. 11(3):822–829.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The interplay among category characteristics, customer characteristics, and customer activities on in-store decision making. J. Marketing 73(5):19–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1967) Customer impulse purchasing behavior. J. Marketing Res. 4(1):21–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1998) Enhancing consumer choice: Are we making appropriate recommendations? J. Consumer Affairs 32(2):227–251.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Consumer Res. 23(4):263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) Promotional elasticities and category characteristics. J. Marketing 60(2):17–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) A hidden Markov model of customer relationship dynamics. Marketing Sci. 27(2):185–204.Link, Google Scholar
- (1989) The effects of situational factors on in-store grocery shopping behavior: The role of store environment and time available for shopping. J. Consumer Res. 15(4):422–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1982) Cost-benefit models for explaining consumer choice and information seeking behavior. Management Sci. 28(2):197–212.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) The future for E-grocery: Amazon (AMZN) fresh retains lead, but startups jump in. Internat. Bus. Times (January 29), http://www.ibtimes.com.Google Scholar
- (2000) Understanding digital markets. Brynjolfsson E, Kahin B, eds. Understanding the Digital Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 99–136.Google Scholar
- (2009) Online Grocery Shopping: Ripe Timing for Resurgence (The Nielsen Company, New York).Google Scholar
- (2012) The impact of an item-based loyalty program on consumer purchase behavior. J. Marketing Res. 49(1):50–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The effectiveness of customized promotions in online and offline stores. J. Marketing Res. 46(2):190–206.Crossref, Google Scholar

