Design Innovativeness and Product Sales' Evolution

References

• Ahearne M, Rapp A, Hughes DE, Jindal R (2010) Managing sales force product perceptions and control systems in the success of new product introductions. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):764–776.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass F (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bloch PH (1995) Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. J. Marketing 59(3):16–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blonigen BA, Knittel CR, Soderbery A (2013) Keeping it fresh: Strategic product redesigns and welfare. NBER Working Paper 18997, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blumer H (1969) Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. Sociol. Quart. 10(3):275–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cappetta R, Cillo P, Ponti A (2006) Convergent designs in fine fashion: An evolutionary model for stylistic innovation. Res. Policy 35(9):1273–1290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy R, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J. Marketing 64(July):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charters S (2006) Design products and design consumption: A review. Consumption Markets Culture 9(3):235–255.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chitturi R, Raghunathan R, Mahajan V (2007) Form versus function: How the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences. J. Marketing Res. 44(November):702–714.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deadrick DL, Bennet N, Russell CJ (1997) Using hierarchical linear modeling to examine dynamic performance criteria over time. J. Management 23(6):745–757.Google Scholar
• Eisenman M (2013) Understanding aesthetic design in the context of technological evolution. Acad. Management Rev. 38(3):332–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods 12(2):121–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder PN, Tellis GJ (1993) Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? J. Marketing Res. 30(2):158–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golder PN, Tellis GJ (1997) Will it ever fly? Modeling the takeoff of really new consumer durables. Marketing Sci. 16(3):256–270.Link, Google Scholar
• Gregan-Paxton J, John DR (1997) Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer. J. Consumer Res. 24(3):266–284.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschman E (1986) The creation of product symbolism. Adv. Consumer Res. 13(3):327–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegg JJ, Alba W (2011) Seeing is believing (too much): The influence of product form on perceptions of functional performance. J. Product Innovation Management 28(3):346–359.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hughes DE (2013) This ad’s for you: The effect of advertising perceptions on salesperson effort and performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 41(1):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain D, Mahajan V, Muller E (1991) Innovation diffusion in the presence of supply restrictions. Marketing Sci. 10(1):83–90.Link, Google Scholar
• Karjalainen T, Snelders D (2010) Designing visual recognition for the brand. J. Product Innovation Management 27(1):6–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreuzbauer R, Malter AJ (2005) Embodied cognition and new product design: Changing product form to influence brand categorization. J. Product Innovation Management 22(3):165–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landwehr JR, Labroo A, Herrmann A (2011) Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Sci. 30(3):416–429.Link, Google Scholar
• McCracken G (1986) Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. J. Consumer Res. 13(1):71–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Midgley D (1983) Patterns of interpersonal information seeking for the purchase of a symbolic product. J. Marketing Res. 20(February):74–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller CM, McIntyre HS, Mantrala MK (1993) Toward formalizing fashion theory. J. Marketing Res. 30(2):142–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Noseworthy TJ, Trudel R (2011) Looks interesting but what does it do? Evaluation of incongruent product form depends on positioning. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):1008–1019.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowlis SM, Simonson I (1996) The effect of new product features on brand choice. J. Marketing Res. 33(1):36–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K, Silva-Risso J, Srinivasan S, Hanssens DM (2004) New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of the automobile industry. J. Marketing 68(October):142–156.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pufall A, Fransoo JC, de Kok AG (2007) What determines product ramp-up performance?: A review of characteristics based on a case study at Nokia Mobile Phones. Beta, Research School for Operations Management and Logistics, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Purohit D (1992) Exploring the relationship between the markets for new and used durable goods: The case of automobiles. Marketing Sci. 11(2):154–167.Link, Google Scholar
• Ravasi D, Rindova VP (2004) Creating symbolic value: A cultural perspective on production and exchange. SDA Bocconi Research paper 111-04, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1265021.Google Scholar
• Rindova VP, Petkova AP (2007) When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organ. Sci. 18(2):217–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Rosa JA, Porac JF, Runser-Spanjol J, Saxon MS (1999) Sociocognitive dynamics in a product market. J. Marketing 63(4):64–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubera G, Droge C (2013) Technology versus design innovation’s effects on sales and Tobin’s q: The moderating role of branding strategy. J. Product Innovation Management 30(3):448–464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubera G, Kirca AJ (2012) Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Marketing 76(3):130–147.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubera G, Griffith DA, Yalcinkaya G (2012) Technological and design innovation effects in regional new product rollouts: A European illustration. J. Product Innovation Management 29(6):1047–1060.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer JD (1998) Using SAS proc mixed to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Ed. Behav. Statist. 24(4):323–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sood A, Tellis GJ (2005) Technological evolution and radical innovation. J. Marketing 69(3):152–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproles GB (1981) Analyzing fashion: Life cycles, principles and perspectives. J. Marketing 45(4):116–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Lilien GL, Rangaswamy A, Pingitore GM, Seldin DM (2012) Total product design concept: An application to the US automotive industry. J. Product Innovation Management 29(S1):3–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strausz R (2009) Planned obsolescence as an incentive device for unobservable quality. Econom. J. 111(October):1405–1421.Google Scholar
• Sullivan M (1990) Measuring image spillovers in umbrella-branded products. J. Bus. 63(3):309–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szymanski DM, Kroff MW, Troy LC (2007) Innovativeness and new product success: Insights from the cumulative evidence. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 35(1):35–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Talke K, Salomo S, Wieringa JE, Lutz A (2009) What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. J. Product Innovation Management 26(6):601–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Veryzer RW Jr (1999) A nonconscious processing explanation of consumer response to product design. Psych. Marketing 16(6):497–522.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Cloak or flaunt? The fashion dilemma. Marketing Sci. 31(1):74–95.Link, Google Scholar