Aggregation Bias in Sponsored Search Data: The Curse and the Cure

References

• Abhishek V, Hosanagar K (2013) Optimal bidding in multi-item multislot sponsored search auctions. Oper. Res. 61(4):855–873.Link, Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Hosanagar K, Smith MD (2011) Location, location, location: An analysis of profitability and position in online advertising markets. J. Marketing Res. 48(6):1057–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ali K, Scarr M (2007) Robust methodologies for modeling web click distributions. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web, WWW '07 (ACM, New York), 511–520.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Rossi PE (1991) There is no aggregation bias: Why macro logit models work. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 9(1):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Animesh A, Ramachandran V, Viswanathan S (2010) Research note–Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 21(1):190–201.Link, Google Scholar
• Christen M, Gupta S, Porter JC, Staelin R, Wittink DR (1997) Using market-level data to understand promotion effects in a nonlinear model. J. Marketing Res. 34(3):322–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craswell N, Zoeter O, Taylor M, Ramsey B (2008) An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. Proc. Internat. Conf. Web Search Web Data Mining, WSDM '08 (ACM, New York), 87–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Bonfrer A, Dhar S (2008) The effect of competitive advertising interference on sales for packaged goods. J. Marketing Res. 45(2):211–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Wedel M, Steerneman T, Boeckenholt U (2005) Solving and testing for regressor-error (in)dependence when no instrumental variables are available: With new evidence for the effect of education on income. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(4):365–392.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Ostrovsky M, Schwarz M (2007) Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(1):242–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Management Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2010) Search engine advertising: Pricing ads to context. SSRN eLibrary. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=10214151.Google Scholar
• Good IJ, Mittal Y (1987) The amalgamation and geometry of two-by-two contingency tables. Ann. Statist. 15(2):694–711.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Chintagunta P, Kaul A, Wittink DR (1996) Do household scanner data provide representative inferences from brand choices: A comparison with store data. J. Marketing Res. 33(4):383–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayashi F (2000) Econometrics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Jeziorski P, Segal I (2009) What makes them click: Empirical analysis of consumer demand for search advertising. Working paper, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. http://web.stanford.edu/~isegat/ads.pdf.Google Scholar
• Kelejian HH (1995) Aggregated heterogeneous dependent data and the logit model: A suggested approach. Econom. Lett. 47(3–4): 243–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kendall M, Stuart A (1977) The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1. Distribution Theory (Macmillan Publishing Co., New York).Google Scholar
• Liu D, Chen J, Whinston AB (2009) Competing keyword auctions. J. Marketing 73(4):125–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller A, Stoyan D (2002) Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (John Wiley, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Nair HS (2013) Estimating causal installed-base effects: A bias-correction approach. J. Marketing Res. 50(1): 70–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neslin SA, Shoemaker RW (1989) An alternative explanation for lower repeat rates after promotion purchases. J. Marketing Res. 26(2):205–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell GJ, Kamakura WA (1994) Understanding brand competition using micro and macro scanner data. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):289–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE (2011) From generic to branded: A model of spillover dynamics in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):87–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Trusov M (2011) Zooming in on paid search ads—A consumer-level model calibrated on aggregated data. Marketing Sci. 30(5):789–800.Link, Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE, Sonnier GP (2012) A latent instrumental variables approach to modeling keyword conversion in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 49(3):306–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenkamp J-BEM, Nijs VR, Hanssens DM, Dekimpe MG (2005) Competitive reactions to advertising and promotion attacks. Marketing Sci. 24(1):35–54.Link, Google Scholar
• Weber TA, Zheng ZE (2007) A model of search intermediaries and paid referrals. Inform. Systems Res. 18(4):414–436.Link, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM (2001) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Yang S, Ghose A (2010) Analyzing the relationship between organic and sponsored search advertising: Positive, negative, or zero interdependence? Marketing Sci. 29(4):602–623.Link, Google Scholar
• Yao S, Mela CF (2011) A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 30(3):447–468.Link, Google Scholar
• Yatchew A, Griliches Z (1985) Specification error in probit models. Rev. Econom. Statist. 67(1):134–139.Crossref, Google Scholar