A Dynamic Model of Rational Addiction: Evaluating Cigarette Taxes

References

• Ailawadi KL, Neslin SA (1998) The effect of promotion on consumption: Buying more and consuming it faster. J. Marketing Res. 35(August):390–398.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Sieg H, Sloan F (2007) Living rationally under the volcano? Heavy drinking and smoking among the elderly. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48(1):37–65.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Murphy KV (1988) A rational model of addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KV (1991) Rational addiction and the effect of price on consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(2):237–241.Google Scholar
• Becker GS, Grossman M, Murphy KV (1994) An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(3):396–418.Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg B, Dubé JP, Mela C, Albuquerque P, Erdem T, Gordon BR, Hanssens D, Hitsch G, Hong H, Sun B (2008) Measuring long-run marketing effects and their implications for long-run marketing decisions. Marketing Lett. 19(3):367–382.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caves KW (2005) Empirical studies of supply and demand dynamics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Chaloupka FJ (1991) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J. Political Econom. 99(4):722–742.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen T, Sun B, Singh V (2009) An empirical investigation of the dynamic effect of Marlboro’s permanent pricing shift. Marketing Sci. 28(4):740–758.Link, Google Scholar
• Ching A, Erdem T, Keane MP (2009) The price consideration model of brand choice. J. Appl. Econometrics 24(3):393–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choo E (2000) Rational addiction and rational cessation: A dynamic structural model of cigarette consumption. Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Choo E (2001) Rational addiction and rational cessation: An application to cigarette consumption. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Dubé JP (2004) Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. 23(1):66–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé JP, Hitsch G, Rossi PE (2010) State dependence and alternative explanations for consumer inertia. RAND J. Econom. 41(3):417–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Imai S, Keane MP (2003) Consumer price and promotion expectations: Capturing consumer brand and quantity choice dynamics under price uncertainty. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(1):5–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fang H, Wang Y (2013) Estimating dynamic discrete choice models with hyperbolic discounting, with an application to mammography decisions. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Goldfarb A, Li Y (2013) Does price elasticity vary with economic growth? A cross-category analysis. J. Marketing Res. 50(1):4–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gruber J, Koszegi B (2001) Is addiction “Rational?” theory and evidence. Quart. J. Econom. 116(4):1261–1303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guadagni P, Little J (1983) A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Sci. 2(3):203–238.Link, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Nair H (2010) Retail competition and the dynamics of demand for tied goods. Marketing Sci. 29(2):366–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1981) Statistical models for discrete panel data. Manski C, McFadden D, eds. The Structural Analysis of Discrete Data (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 91–139.Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006a) Measuring the implications of sales and consumer stockpiling behavior. Econometrica 74(6):1637–1673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendel I, Nevo A (2006b) Sales and consumer inventory. RAND J. Econom. 37(3):543–561.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermalin BE, Isen AM (2008) A model of the effect of affect on economic decision making. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(1):17–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch S, Kim BC, Montgomery A, Rossi PE (1995) Determinants of store–level price elasticity. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):17–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iannaccone LR (1986) Addiction and satiation. Econom. Lett. 21(1):95–99.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis MJ (2004) Why people smoke. British Medical J. 328(7434):277–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keanne MP (1997) Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. 15(3):310–327.Google Scholar
• Lindblom E, Boonn A (2009) The federal tax rate is much lower than historical levels. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. Accessed December 14, 2014, http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0092.pdf.Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Times (2008) State bans trans fats. (July 26). Accessed December 14, 2014, http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jul/26/local/me-transfat26.Google Scholar
• Machado FS, Sinha RK (2007) Smoking cessation: A model of planned vs. actual behavior for time–inconsistent consumers. Marketing Sci. 26(6):834–850.Link, Google Scholar
• Mulholland J (1991) Policy issues concerning the promotion of less hazardous cigarettes. Bureau of Economics, FTC Working paper. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Neslin S, Henderson C, Quelch J (1985) Consumer promotions and the acceleration of product purchases. Marketing Sci. 4(2):147–165.Link, Google Scholar
• New York Times (2008) Government gets hooked on tobacco tax billions (August 30), WK3. Accessed December 14, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/31/weekinreview/31saul.html.Google Scholar
• New York Times (2012) Health panel approves restriction on sale of large sugary drinks (September 13), A24. Accessed December 14, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/14/nyregion/health-board-approves-bloombergs-soda-ban.html.Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orphanides A, Zervos D (1995) Rational addiction with learning and regret. J. Political Econom. 103(4):739–758.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orzechowski and Walker (2012) The tax burden on tobacco. Vol. 47, Federation of Tax Administrators. Accessed December 14, 2014, http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/tobacco/papers/tax_burden_2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Pollack RA (1970) Habit formation and dynamic demand functions. J. Political Econom. 78(4):745–763.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romm T (2009) Recession ushers in more tobacco taxes. Stateline.org, June 17. Accessed December 14, 2014, http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=407272.Google Scholar
• Rose J (2006) Nicotine and nonnicotine factors in cigarette addiction. Psychopharmacology 184(2):274–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy R, Chintagunta PK, Haldar S (1996) A framework for investigating habits, “the hand of the past,” and heterogeneity in dynamic brand choice. Marketing Sci. 15(3):280–299.Link, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of markov decision processes. Engle R, McFadden D, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4 (North Holland, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Google Scholar
• Seetharaman PB (2004) Modeling multiple sources of state dependence in random utility models: A distributed lag approach. Marketing Sci. 23(2):263–271.Link, Google Scholar
• Stigler G, Becker GS (1977) De gustubus non est disputandum. Amer. Econom. Rev. 67(2):76–90.Google Scholar
• Sun B (2005) Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. 24(3):430–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Suranovic SM, Goldfarb RS, Leonard TC (1999) An economic theory of cigarette addiction. J. Health Econom. 18(1):1–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1986) The health consequences of involuntary smoking. Report of the Surgeon General. Public Health Service, Office Smoking and Health, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• USA Today (2012) Tax hike cuts tobacco consumption (September 10), Accessed December 14, 2014, http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-09-10/cigarette-tax-smoking/57737774/1.Google Scholar
• Viscusi KW (2003) Principles for cigarette taxation in Africa. RPP–2003–19, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Vuong QH (1989) Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57(2):307–333.Crossref, Google Scholar