Television Advertising and Online Shopping

References

• Anderson SP, Renault R (2006) Advertising content. Amer. Econom. Rev. 39(1):305–326.Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Ciliberto F, Liaukonyte J (2013) Information content of advertising: Empirical evidence from the OTC analgesic industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 31(5):355–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake T, Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) Consumer heterogeneity and paid search effectiveness: A large scale field experiment. Econometrica 83(1):155–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buijzen M, Valkenburg PM (2004) Developing a typology of humor in audiovisual media. Media Psych. 6(2):147–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bush AJ, Bush RP (1990) A content analysis of direct response television advertising. J. Direct Marketing 4(1):6–12.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych. Bull. 56(2):81–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandy RK, Tellis GJ, MacInnis DJ, Thaivanich P (2001) What to say when: Advertising appeals in evolving markets. J. Marketing Res. 38(4):399–414.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaney PK, Devinney TM, Winer RS (1991) The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms. J. Bus. 64(4):573–610.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dagger T, Danaher PJ (2013) Comparing the relative effectiveness of advertising channels: A case study of a multimedia blitz campaign. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):517–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ (2007) Modeling page views across multiple websites with an application to Internet reach and frequency prediction. Marketing Sci. 26(3):422–437.Link, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Green BJ (1997) A comparison of media factors that influence the effectiveness of direct response television advertising. J. Interactive Marketing 11(2):46–58.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong S, Zhang J, Zhao P, Jiang X (2014) Tweets and Sales: A Field Experiment (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haans H, Raassens N, van Hout R (2013) Search engine advertisements: The impact of advertising statements on click-through and conversion rates. Marketing Lett. 24(2):151–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann W, Nair H, Narayanan S (2011) Identifying causal marketing mix effects using a regression discontinuity design. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1079–1097.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Moe W, Fader P, Steven B, Lohse J (2004) On the depth and dynamics of online search behavior. Management Sci. 50(3):299–308.Link, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Cowgill B, Zhu Y (2014) Television advertising and online search. Management Sci. 60(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Kolsarici C, Vakratsas D (2011) The complexity of multi-media effects. Marketing Science Institute Working Paper Series 2011, Report 11–100. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Nguyen D (2014) Wasn’t That an Ad for the iPad? Display Advertising’s Impact on Advertiser- and Competitor-Branded Search (University of Chicago, Chicago).Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2013) Down-to-the-minute effects of Super Bowl advertising on online search behavior. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce 9(4):639–656.Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J (2014) Is comparative advertising an active ingredient in the market for pain relief? Working paper, School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
• Lin C, Venkataraman S, Jap SD (2013) Media multiplexing behavior: Implications for targeting and media planning. Marketing Sci. 32(2):310–324.Link, Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Price LL (1987) The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. J. Consumer Res. 13(4):473–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Fader PS (2004) Capturing evolving visit behavior in clickstream data. J. Interactive Marketing 18(1):5–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery AL, Li S, Srinivasan K, Liechty JC (2004) Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. 23(4):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Peters K (2009) A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media synergies. J. Interactive Marketing 23(4):288–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naik PA, Raman K (2003) Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J. Marketing Res. 13(4):25–34.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2010) Three screen report, 1st Quarter 2010. White paper. Accessed August 8, 2013, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2010/what-consumers-watch-nielsens-q1-2010-three-screen-report.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2011) 40% of tablet and smartphone owners use them while watching TV. Accessed August 8, 2013, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/newswire/2011/40-of-tablet-and-smartphone-owners-use-them-while-watching-tv.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2012) State of the media: Advertising and audiences Part 2. Accessed February 4, 2015, http://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2012-Reports/nielsen-advertising-audiences-report-spring-2012.pdf.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2014) The U.S. digital consumer report. White paper. Accessed March 14, 2014, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/reports/2014/the-us-digital-consumer-report.html.Google Scholar
• Ofcom (2013) Communications market report 2013. White paper, Ofcom, UK Communications Regulator, London.Google Scholar
• Onishi H, Manchanda P (2012) Marketing activity, blogging and sales. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(3):221–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park YH, Fader PS (2004) Modeling browsing behavior at multiple websites. Marketing Sci. 23(3):280–303.Link, Google Scholar
• Peltier JW, Mueller B, Rosen RG (1992) Direct response versus image advertising: Enhancing communication effectiveness through an integrated approach. J. Direct Marketing 6(1):40–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubinson J (2009) VIEWPOINT-the new marketing research imperative: It’s about learning. J. Advertising Res. 49(1):7–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni N (2012) The Effect of Temporal Spacing Between Advertising Exposures: Evidence from Online Field Experiments (Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA).Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Picard R, el Kaliouby R (2014) Why, when and how much to entertain consumers in advertisements? A web-based facial tracking field study. Marketing Sci. 33(6):809–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Wedel M, Pieters R (2012) Emotion-induced engagement in Internet video ads. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):144–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ (2004) Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Chandy RK, Thaivanich P (2000) Which ad works, when, where, and how often? Modeling the effects of direct television advertising. J. Marketing Res. 37(1):32–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kempe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Wind YJ, Sharp B (2009) Advertising empirical generalizations: Implications for research and action. J. Advertising Res. 49(2):246–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu J, Cook VJ Jr, Strong EC (2005) A two-stage model of the promotional performance of pure online firms. Inform. Systems Res. 16(4):334–351.Link, Google Scholar
• Xu L, Wilbur KC, Siddarth S, Silva-Risso J (2014) Price advertising by manufacturers and dealers. Management Sci. 60(11):2816–2834.Link, Google Scholar
• Zigmond D, Stipp H (2010) Assessing a new advertising effect: Measurement of the impact of television commercials on Internet search queries. J. Advertising Res. 50(2):162–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigmond D, Stipp H (2011) Multitaskers may be advertisers’ best audience. Harvard Bus. Rev. 12(1/2):32–33.Google Scholar