Consumer Uncertainty and Purchase Decision Reversals: Theory and Evidence

References

• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. 51(10):1449–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2010) Reference groups and product line decisions: An experimental investigation of limited editions and product proliferation. Management Sci. 56(4):621–644.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Sullivan M (1993) The antecedants and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Sci. 12(2):125–143.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Hansen K, Simester D (2009) The option value of returns: Theory and empirical evidence. Marketing Sci. 28(3):405–423.Link, Google Scholar
• Balachander S (2001) Warranty signaling and reputation. Management Sci. 49(7):1282–1289.Link, Google Scholar
• Baum C (2006) An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata (Stata Press, College Station, TX).Google Scholar
• Bechwati N, Siegal W (2005) The impact of the prechoice process on product returns. J. Marketing Res. 42(3):358–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boone L, Kurtz D (2007) Contemporary Marketing, 13th ed. (Thomson Learning, Mason, OH).Google Scholar
• Breiter H, Aharon I, Kahneman D, Dale A, Shizgal P (2001) Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron 30(2):619–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bruce N, Desai P, Staelin R (2006) Enabling the willing: Consumer rebates for durable goods. Marketing Sci. 25(4):350–366.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G (2003) Supply chain coordination with contracts. Graves S, de Kok T, eds. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (North Holland, Amsterdam), 227–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che Y (1996) Consumer return policies for experience goods. J. Indust. Econom. 44(1):17–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Turut O (2013) Context-dependent preferences and innovation strategy. Management Sci. 59(12):2747–2765.Link, Google Scholar
• Chu W, Gerstner E, Hess J (1998) Managing dissatisfaction: How to decrease customer opportunism by partial refunds. J. Service Res. 1(2):140–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cui T, Mallucci P (2013) Fairness ideals in distribution channels. Working paper, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
• Davis S, Gerstner E, Hagerty M (1995) Money back guarantees in retailing: Matching products to consumer tastes. J. Retailing 71(1):7–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis S, Hagerty M, Gerstner E (1998) Return policies and the optimal level of “hassle”. J. Econom. Bus. 50(5):445–460.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Purohit D (1998) Leasing and selling: Optimal strategies for a durable goods firm. Management Sci. 44(11):S19–S34.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Kalra A, Murthi B (2008) When old is gold: The role of business longevity in risky situations. J. Marketing 72(1):95–107.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Koenigsberg O, Purohit D (2004) Strategic decentralization and channel coordination. Quant. Marketing Econom. 2(1):5–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Douthit D, Flach M, Agarwal V (2011) A “returning problem” reducting the quantity and cost of product returns in consumer electronics. Accenture. http://www.accenture.com/sitecollectiondocuments/pdf/accenture-reducing-the-quantity-and-cost-of-customerreturns.pdf.Google Scholar
• Enright T (2003) Post-holiday logistics. Traffic WORLD (January 6):20.Google Scholar
• Farber H (2008) Reference-dependent preferences and labor supply: The case of New York City taxi drivers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):1069–1082.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson M, Guide VDR, Souza G (2006) Supply chain coordination for false failure returns. Manufacturing Services Oper. Management 8(4):376–393.Link, Google Scholar
• Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Applications to poisson models. Econometrica 52(3):701–720.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Liu Y (2013) Consumer fit search, retailer shelf layout, and channel interaction. Marketing Sci. 32(4):652–668.Link, Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Xie Y (2013) Facilitating fit revelation in the competitive market. Management Sci. 59(5):1196–1212.Link, Google Scholar
• Gumus M, Ray S, Yin S (2013) Returns policies between channel partners for durable products. Marketing Sci. 32(4):622–643.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2009) Service cancellation and competitive refund policy. Marketing Sci. 28(5):901–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Hardie B, Johnson E, Fader P (1993) Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Sci. 12(4):378–394.Link, Google Scholar
• Heilman C, Bowman D, Wright G (2000) The evolution of brand preferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market. J. Marketing Res. 37(2):139–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hess J, Chu W, Gerstner E (1996) Controlling product returns in direct marketing. Marketing Lett. 7(4):307–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T, Zhang J (2008) Designing pricing contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the framing of the fixed fee matter? Management Sci. 54(4):686–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Ho T, Lim N, Camerer C (2006) Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):307–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T, Lim N, Cui T (2010) Reference-dependence in multi-location newsvendor models: A structural analysis. Management Sci. 56(11):1891–1910.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoch S, Ha J (1986) Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Kuksov D (2012) Competition in consumer shopping experience. Marketing Sci. 31(6):913–933.Link, Google Scholar
• Janiszewski C, Cunha M Jr (2004) The influence of price discount framing on the evaluation of a product bundle. J. Consumer Res. 30(4):534–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory—Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kőszegi B, Rabin M (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1133–1165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Lin Y (2010) Information provision in a vertically differentiated competitive marketplace. Marketing Sci. 29(1):122–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Lattin J, Bucklin R (1989) Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):299–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim N, Ho T (2007) Designing price contracts for boundedly rational customers: Does the number of blocks matter? Marketing Sci. 26(3):312–326.Link, Google Scholar
• Mellers B, Schwartz A, Ritov I (1999) Emotion-based choice. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 128(3):332–345.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller C (2011) Defying conventional wisdom to sell glasses online. New York Times (January 16):B1. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/17/technology/17glasses.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
• Moorthy S, Srinivasan K (1995) Signaling quality with money-back guarantees: The role of transaction costs. Marketing Sci. 14(4):442–466.Link, Google Scholar
• Narasimhan C, Turut O (2013) Differentiate or imitate? The role of context-dependent preferences. Marketing Sci. 32(3):393–410.Link, Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Katona Z, Sarvary M (2011) Bricks and clicks: The impact of product returns on the strategies of multi-channel retailers. Marketing Sci. 40(1):42–60.Link, Google Scholar
• Orhun Y (2009) Optimal product line design when consumers exhibit choice set-dependent preferences. Marketing Sci. 28(5): 868–886.Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts J, Urban G (1988) Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. 34(2):167–185.Link, Google Scholar
• Saini R, Rao R, Monga A (2010) Is that deal worth my time? The interactive effect of relative and referent thinking on willingness to seek a bargain. J. Marketing 74(1):34–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos Silva J, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev. Econom. Statist. 88(4):641–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos Silva J, Tenreyro S (2010) On the existence of the maximum likelihood estimates in poisson regression. Econom. Lett. 107(2):310–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos Silva J, Tenreyro S (2011) Further simulation evidence on the performance of the poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. Econom. Lett. 112(2):220–222.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shugan S, Xie J (2005) Advance-selling as a competitive marketing tool. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 22(3):351–373.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman J, Coughlan A (2007) Used goods, not used bads: Profitable secondary market sales for a durable goods channel. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(2):191–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shulman J, Coughlan A, Savaskan R (2009) Optimal restocking fees and information provision in an integrated demand-supply model of product returns. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 11(4):577–594.Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman J, Coughlan A, Savaskan R (2010) Optimal reverse channel structure for consumer product returns. Marketing Sci. 29(6): 1071–1085.Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman J, Coughlan A, Savaskan R (2011) Managing consumer returns in a competitive environment. Management Sci. 57(2): 347–362.Link, Google Scholar
• Staiger D, Stock J (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3):557–586.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Windmeijer F, Santos Silva J (1997) Endogeneity in count data models: An application to demand for health care. J. Appl. Econometrics 12(3):281–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood S (2001) Remote purchase environments: The influence of return policy leniency on two-stage decision processes. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):157–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie J, Gerstner E (2007) Service escape: Profiting from customer cancellations. Marketing Sci. 26(1):18–30.Link, Google Scholar
• Xie J, Shugan S (2001) Electronic tickets, smart cards, and online prepayments: When and how to advance sell. Marketing Sci. 20(3):219–243.Link, Google Scholar
• Yin S, Ray S, Gurnani H, Animesh A (2010) Durable products with multiple used goods markets: Product upgrade and retail pricing implications. Marketing Sci. 29(3):540–560.Link, Google Scholar