Cartel Formation Through Strategic Information Leakage in a Distribution Channel

References

• Abreu D, Pearce D, Stacchetti E (1986) Optimal cartel equilibria with imperfect monitoring. J. Econom. Theory 39(1):251–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abreu D, Pearce D, Stacchetti E (1990) Toward a theory of discounted repeated games with imperfect monitoring. Econometrica 58(5):1041–1063.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anand KS, Goyal M (2009) Strategic information management under leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 55(3):438–452.Link, Google Scholar
• Arrow K (1985) The economics of agency. Pratt J, Zeckhauser RJ, eds. Principals and Agents (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA), 37–51.Google Scholar
• Asker J (2010) A study of the internal organization of a bidding cartel. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):724–762.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Bagwell K (2001) Optimal collusion with private information. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):428–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S, Bagwell K, Sanchirico C (2004) Collusion and price rigidity. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):317–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P, Tadelis S (2001) Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. 32(3):387–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2001) Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Sci. 47(5):629–646.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ozer O (2016) Supply chain contracts that prevent information leakage. Working paper, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cho I, Kreps D (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):179–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu LY, Shamir N, Shin H (2016) Strategic communication for capacity alignment with pricing in a supply chain. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Link, Google Scholar
• Desai P, Srinivasan K (1995) Demand signalling under unobservable effort in franchising: Linear and nonlinear price contracts. Management Sci. 41(10):1608–1623.Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanti SS, Nagata EA (1994) Competitor communications: Facilitating practices or invitations to collude? An application of theories to proposed horizontal agreements submitted for antitrust review. Antitrust Law J. 63(1):93–131.Google Scholar
• Dukes A, Gal-Or E, Geylani T (2011) Who benefits from bilateral information exchange in a retail channel? Econom. Lett. 112(2): 210–212.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (1991) Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Gal-Or M, Dukes A (2007) Optimal information revelation in procurement schemes. RAND J. Econom. 38(2):400–418.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E, Geylani T, Dukes AJ (2008) Information sharing in a channel with partially informed retailers. Marketing Sci. 27(4): 642–658.Link, Google Scholar
• Gerlach H (2009) Stochastic market sharing, partial communication and collusion. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(6):655–666.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green EJ, Porter RH (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52(1):87–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2009) The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Marketing Sci. 28(3):457–471.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Iyer G (2010) Information acquisition and sharing in a vertical relationship. Marketing Sci. 29(3):483–506.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tong S (2008) Contracting and information sharing under supply chain competition. Management Sci. 54(4):701–715.Link, Google Scholar
• Ha AY, Tong S, Zhang H (2011) Sharing demand information in competing supply chains with production diseconomies. Management Sci. 57(3):566–581.Link, Google Scholar
• Hanazono M, Yang H (2007) Collusion, fluctuating demand, and price rigidity. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48(2):483–515.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrington JE Jr (2004) Cartel pricing dynamics in the presence of an antitrust authority. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):651–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hay GA (2006) Horizontal agreements: Concept and proof. Antitrust Bull. 51(4):877–914.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He C, Marklund J, Vossen T (2008) Vertical information sharing in a volatile market. Marketing Sci. 27(3):513–530.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Villas-Boas JM (2003) A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. 40(1):80–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplow L (2011a) An economic approach to price fixing. Antitrust Law J. 77(2):343–449.Google Scholar
• Kaplow L (2011b) On the meaning of horizontal agreements in competition law. Calif. Law Rev. 99(3):683–818.Google Scholar
• Kong G, Rajagopalan S, Zhang H (2013) Revenue sharing and information leakage in a supply chain. Management Sci. 59(3): 556–572.Link, Google Scholar
• Kong G, Rajagopalan S, Zhang H (2016) Information leakage in supply chains. Ha A, Tang C, eds. Information Exchange in Supply Chains (Springer, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Kovacic WE (1993) The identification and proof of horizontal agreements under the antitrust laws. Antitrust Bull. 38(1):5–81.Google Scholar
• Kühn K-U (2001) Fighting collusion by regulating communication between firms. Econom. Policy 16(32):167–204.Google Scholar
• Levin J (2003) Relational incentive contracts. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):835–857.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li L (2002) Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. 48(9):1196–1212.Link, Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang H (2008) Confidentiality and information sharing in supply chain coordination. Management Sci. 54(8):1467–1481.Link, Google Scholar
• Li X (2005) Cheap talk and bogus network externalities in the emerging technology market. Marketing Sci. 24(4):531–543.Link, Google Scholar
• Mittendorf B, Shin J, Yoon DH (2013) Manufacturer marketing initiatives and retailer information sharing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 11(2):263–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nocke V, White L (2007) Do vertical mergers facilitate upstream collusion? Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(4):1321–1339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Özer Ö, Wei W (2006) Strategic commitments for an optimal capacity decision under asymmetric forecast information. Management Sci. 52(8):1238–1257.Link, Google Scholar
• Pasternack BA (1985) Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Sci. 4(2):166–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Rachmilevitch S (2013) Endogenous bid rotation in repeated auctions. J. Econom. Theory 148(4):1714–1725.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rachmilevitch S (2014) First-best collusion without communication. Games Econom. Behav. 83(1):224–230.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (1986) A supergame-theoretic model of price wars during booms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 76(3):390–407.Google Scholar
• Shamir N, Shin H (2016) Public forecast information sharing in a market with competing supply chains. Management Sci. 62(10):2994–3022.Link, Google Scholar
• Shang W, Ha AY, Tong S (2016) Information sharing in a supply chain with a common retailer. Management Sci. 62(1):245–263.Link, Google Scholar
• Shin H, Tunca TI (2010) Do firms invest in forecasting efficiently? The effect of competition on demand forecast investments and supply chain coordination. Oper. Res. 58(6):1592–1610.Link, Google Scholar
• Spengler JJ (1950) Vertical integration and antitrust policy. J. Political Econom. 58(4):347–352.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (1994) Sleeping with the enemy: Should competitors share the same advertising agency? Marketing Sci. 13(2): 190–202.Link, Google Scholar
• Vives X (1984) Duopoly information equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand. J. Econom. Theory 34(1):71–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang H (2002) Vertical information exchange in a supply chain with duopoly retailers. Production Oper. Management 11(4): 531–546.Crossref, Google Scholar