Spillover Effects in Seeded Word-of-Mouth Marketing Campaigns

References

• Anderson ET, Simester D (2013) Advertising in a competitive market: The role of product standards, customer learning, and switching costs. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):489–504.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson EW (2003a) The formation of market-level expectations and its covariates. J. Consumer Res. 30(1):115–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC (2003b) Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. J. Memory Language 49(4):415–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Bell T (2001) Forgetting our facts: The role of inhibitory processes in the loss of propositional knowledge. J. Experiment. Psych. General 130(3):544–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson MC, Bjork RA (1994) Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. Dagenbach D, Carr T, eds. Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language (Academic Press, San Diego) 265–326.Google Scholar
• Arndt J (1967) Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. J. Marketing Res. 4(3):291–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balachander S, Ghose S (2003) Reciprocal spillover effects: A strategic benefit of brand extensions. J. Marketing 67(1):4–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Marketing Res. 48(5):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biyalogorsky E, Gerstner E, Libai B (2001) Customer referral management: Optimal reward program. Marketing Sci. 20(1):82–95.Link, Google Scholar
• Bone PF (1995) Word-of-mouth effects on short-term and long-term product judgments. J. Bus. Res. 32(3):213–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borah A, Tellis GJ (2016) Halo (spillover) effects in social media: Do product recalls of one brand hurt or help rival brands? J. Marketing Res. 53(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dhar R, Kim EY (2007) Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):96–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The (2014) Now or Naver. (March 1). http://www.economist.com/news/business/21597937-home-south-koreas-biggest-web-portal-has-thrashed-yahoo-and-kept-google-bay-now-its.Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Sun B (2002) An empirical investigation of the spillover effects of advertising and sales promotions in umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Euromonitor (2013) Color cosmetics in South Korea. (April). Report, Euromonitor International, London. http://www.euromonitor.com/colour-cosmetics-in-south-korea/report.Google Scholar
• Fiedler K (2007) Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):101–106.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garthwaite CL (2014) Demand spillovers, combative advertising, and celebrity endorsements. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 6(2):76–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Herr PM, Kardes FR, Kim J (1991) Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J. Consumer Res. 17(4):454–462.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU (2011) Seeding strategy for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. J. Marketing 75(6): 55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kardes FR, Cronley ML, Kim J (2006) Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. J. Consumer Psych. 16(2): 135–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz E, Lazarsfeld PF (1955) Personal Influence (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Kornish LJ, Li Q (2010) Optimal referral bonuses with asymmetric information: Firm-offered and interpersonal incentives. Marketing Sci. 29(1):108–121.Link, Google Scholar
• Kozinets RV, De Valck K, Wojnicki AC, Wilner SJS (2010) Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. J. Marketing 74(2):71–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan T, Seetharaman PB, Vakratsas D (2012) The multiple roles of interpersonal communication in new product growth. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(3):292–305.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Petersen JA, Leone RP (2010) Driving profitability by encouraging customer referrals: Who, when, and how. J. Marketing 74(5):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamberton C, Stephen AT (2016) A thematic exploration of digital, social media, and mobile marketing research’s evolution from 2000 to 2015 and an agenda for future research. J. Marketing Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2): 93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libai B, Muller E, Peres R (2009) The role of within-brand and cross-brand communications in competitive growth. J. Marketing 73(3):19–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libai B, Muller E, Peres R (2013) Decomposing the value of word-of-mouth seeding programs: Acceleration versus expansion. J. Marketing Res. 50(2):161–176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libai B, Bolton R, Bügel MS, de Ruyter K, Götz O, Risselada H, Stephen AT (2010) Customer-to-customer interactions: Broadening the scope of word-of-mouth research. J. Service Res. 13(3): 267–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y (1998) The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 75(1):5–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Peres R, Shachar R (2013) On brands and word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 50(2):427–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore SG (2015) Attitude predictability and helpfulness in online reviews: The role of explained actions and reactions. J. Consumer Res. 42(1):30–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peres R, Van den Bulte C (2014) When to take or forgo new product exclusivity: Balancing protection from competition against word-of-mouth spillover. J. Marketing 78(2):83–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ryu G, Feick L (2007) A penny for your thoughts: Referral reward programs and referral likelihood. J. Marketing 71(1):84–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2016) Advertising spillovers: Evidence from online field experiments and implications for returns on advertising. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):459–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitt P, Skiera B, Van den Bulte C (2011) Referral programs and customer value. J. Marketing 75(1):46–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schulze C, Schöler L, Skiera B (2014) Not all fun and games: Viral marketing for utilitarian products. J. Marketing 78(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simonin BL, Ruth JA (1998) Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. J. Marketing Res. 35(1):30–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnier GP, McAlister L, Rutz OJ (2011) A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Marketing Sci. 30(4):702–716.Link, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT (2016) The role of digital and social media marketing in consumer behavior. Current Opinion Psych. 10(August):17–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):629–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Lehmann D (2016) How word-of-mouth transmission encouragement affects consumers’ transmission decisions, receiver selection, and diffusion speed. Internat. J. Res. Marketing Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2003) Temporal construal. Psych. Rev. 110(3): 403–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psych. Rev. 117(2):440–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N, Wakslak C (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 17(2):83–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Wuyts S (2007) Social Networks and Marketing (Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Villanueva J, Yoo S, Hanssens DM (2008) The impact of marketing-induced versus word-of-mouth customer acquisition on customer equity growth. J. Marketing Res. 45(1):48–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):441–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte WH Jr (1954) The web of word of mouth. Fortune 50(November):140–143.Google Scholar
• Wojnicki AC, Godes D (2008) Word-of-mouth as self-enhancement. Harvard Business School Marketing Research Paper, 06–01, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Crossref, Google Scholar
• WOMMA (2005) Word of mouth 101. Word of Mouth Marketing Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
• WOMMA (2014) The state of word of mouth marketing: A survey of marketers. Word of Mouth Marketing Association, Chicago.Google Scholar