Television Advertising and Online Word-of-Mouth: An Empirical Investigation of Social TV Activity

References

• Benton A, Hill S (2012) The spoiler effect? Designing social TV content that promotes ongoing WOM. Conf. Inform. Systems Tech., Phoenix.Google Scholar
• Berger J, Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral? J. Marketing Res. 49(2):192–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word-of-mouth? J. Marketing Res. 48(5):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradlow ET, Schmittlein DC (2000) The little engines that could: Modeling the performance of World Wide Web search engines. Marketing Sci. 19(1):43–62.Link, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Green BJ (1997) A comparison of media factors that influence the effectiveness of direct response television advertising. J. Direct Marketing 11(2):46–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deggans E (2016) Nielsen to use Facebook and Twitter in new social TV ratings. NPR (January 20). http://www.npr.org/2016/01/20/463740422/nielsen-to-use-facebook-and-twitter-in-new-social-tv-ratings.Google Scholar
• Dumenco S (2013) Q&A: The (real) state of social TV right now. Ad Age (April 11). http://adage.com/article/trending-topics/q-a-real-state-social-tv/240799/.Google Scholar
• Feltham TS, Arnold SJ (1994) Program involvement and ad/program consistency as moderators of program context effects. J. Consumer Psych. 3(1):51–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flomenbaum A (2016) Exclusive: Nielsen study shows that TV advertising drives earned media for brands on Twitter. The Drum (February 21). http://www.thedrum.com/news/2016/02/21/exclusive-nielsen-study-shows-tv-advertising-drives-earned-media-brands-twitter.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Gong S, Zhang J, Zhao P, Jiang X (2016) Tweeting to grow demand: The case of TV viewership. Working paper, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing.Google Scholar
• Gopinath S, Thomas JS, Krishnamurthi L (2014) Investigating the relationship between the content of online word of mouth, advertising, and brand performance. Marketing Sci. 33(2):241–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Hare B (2012) Twice as much TV? How networks are adapting to the second screen. CNN (September 15). http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/showbiz/tv/second-screen-tv-our-mobile-society/.Google Scholar
• Hitz L (2014) Influencer marketing: Stats and quotes you need to know. Simply Measured (June 18). http://simplymeasured.com/blog/influencer-marketing/#sm.00007unfd9qtbdmmyzh2cjvfqtios.Google Scholar
• IAB (2015) The changing TV experience: Attitudes and usage across multiple screens. (April). http://www.iab.com/insights/the-changing-tv-experience-attitudes-and-usage-across-multiple-screens/.Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Cowgill B, Zhu Y (2014) Television advertising and online search. Management Sci. 60(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Kantar Media (2014) A year in the life of TV and Twitter in the UK. (September 24). http://www.kantarmedia.com/global/newsroom/press-releases/kantar-media-study-confirms-link-between-twitter-activity-and-tv-viewing-in-the-uk.Google Scholar
• Katz H (2013) The Media Handbook: A Complete Guide to Advertising Media Selection, Planning, Research, and Buying (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Bhaskaran V, Mirchandani R, Shah M (2013) Creating a measurable social media marketing strategy: Increasing the value and ROI of intangibles and tangibles for hokey pokey. Marketing Sci. 32(2):194–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Lord KR, Burnkrant RE (1993) Attention versus distraction: The interactive effect of program involvement and attentional devices on commercial processing. J. Advertising 22(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Staelin R (2016) The role of paid, earned, and owned media in building entertainment brands: Reminding, informing, and enhancing enjoyment. Marketing Sci. 35(1):142–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Peres R, Shachar R (2013) On brands and word of mouth. J. Marketing Res. 50(4):427–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Moorman C, Jaworski BJ (1991) Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J. Marketing 55(4):32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MarketsandMarkets (2012) Social TV market: Global advancements, ecosystem, business models, technology roadmap, worldwide market forecasts and analysis (2012–2017). (October). http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/social-tv-market-815.html.Google Scholar
• Midha A (2014) Study: Exposure to TV tweets drives consumers to take action—Both on and off Twitter. Twitter (May 8). https://blog.twitter.com/2014/study-exposure-to-tv-tweets-drives-consumers-to-take-action-both-on-and-off-of-twitter.Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Murry JP Jr, Lastovicka JL, Singh SN (1992) Feeling and liking responses to television programs: An examination of two explanations for media-context effects. J. Consumer Res. 18(4): 441–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2014a) What’s empowering the new digital consumer? (February 10). http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/news/2014/whats-empowering-the-new-digital-consumer.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2014b) Fast friends: How brands are capturing the attention of social TV audiences. (September 15). http://www.nielsensocial.com/fast-friends-how-brands-are-capturing-the-attention-of-social-tv-audiences/?utm_content=bufferdd510&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2015) Social TV: A bellwether for TV audience engagement. (March 9). http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/social-tv-a-bellwether-for-tv-audience-engagement.html.Google Scholar
• Onishi H, Manchanda P (2012) Marketing activity, blogging and sales. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(3):221–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pew Research (2015) Social media update 2014. (January 9). http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/.Google Scholar
• Poggi J (2012) The two biggest hurdles social TV still needs to overcome. Ad Age (October 4). http://adage.com/article/media/biggest-hurdles-social-tv-overcome/237576/.Google Scholar
• Raghunathan R, Corfman K (2006) Is happiness shared doubled and sadness shared halved? Social influence on enjoyment of hedonic experiences. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):386–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rishika R, Kumar A, Janakiraman R, Bezawada R (2013) The effect of customers’ social media participation on customer visit frequency and profitability: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. 24(1):108–127.Link, Google Scholar
• Schreiner T (2013) Amplifiers study: The Twitter users who are most likely to retweet and how to engage them. Twitter (January 10). https://blog.twitter.com/2013/amplifiers-study-the-twitter-users-who-are-most-likely-to-retweet-and-how-to-engage-them.Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Kent RJ (2010) Predictors of the gap between program and commercial audiences: An investigation using live tuning data. J. Marketing 74(3):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Foutz NZ, Tanner RJ (2014) Synergy or interference: The effect of product placement on commercial break audience decline. Marketing Sci. 33(6):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Siddarth S, Chattopadhyay A (1998) To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Sci. 17(2):124–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Stadd A (2014) How social media influences purchase decisions. Adweek (January 22). http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/social-media-purchase-decisions/495780.Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of microlending marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Furse DH (1986) Effective Television Advertising: A Study of 1000 Commercials (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Subramanyam R (2011) The relationship between social media buzz and TV ratings. Nielsen (October 6). http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2011/the-relationship-between-social-media-buzz-and-tv-ratings.html.Google Scholar
• Tavassoli NT, Shultz CJ II, Fitzsimons GJ (1995) Program involvement: Are moderate levels best for ad memory and attitude toward the ad? J. Advertising Res. 35(5):61–72.Google Scholar
• Teixeira T, Wedel M, Pieters R (2012) Emotion-induced engagement in Internet video advertisements. J. Marketing Res. 49(2): 144–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ, Chandy RK, Thaivanich P (2000) Which ad works, when, where, and how often? Modeling the effects of direct television advertising. J. Marketing Res. 37(1):32–46.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallenstein A (2015) Nielsen pitching new “Tweets per impression” metric to entertainment marketers. Variety (February 4). http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/nielsen-pitching-new-tweets-per-impression-metric-to-entertainment-marketers-1201423788/.Google Scholar
• Wang J, Calder BJ (2006) Media transportation and advertising. J. Consumer Res. 33(2):151–162.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang J, Calder BJ (2009) Media engagement and advertising: Transportation, matching, transference, and intrusion. J. Consumer Psych. 19(3):546–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinstein S (2014) How “Scandal” paved the way for ABC’s Twitter-based “#TGIT” marketing strategy. Variety (September 22). http://variety.com/2014/tv/news/scandal-twitter-shonda-rhimes-tgit-abc-shondaland-1201311282/.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. 27(3):356–378.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kempe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar