“Ten Million Readers Can’t Be Wrong!,” or Can They? On the Role of Information About Adoption Stock in New Product Trial

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.1011

References

  • Abrams D, Wetherell M, Cochrane S, Hogg MA, Turner JC (1990) Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British J. Soc. Psych. 29(2):97–119.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005a) Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. 51(10):1449–1466.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005b) Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):30–42.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E, Lin S, Simester D, Tucker C (2015) Harbingers of failure. J. Marketing Res. 52(5):580–592.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asch SE (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Guetzkow H, ed. Groups, Leadership and Men (Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh), 222–236.Google Scholar
  • Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DR, Song S (2007) Neighborhood effects and trial on the Internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5(4):361–400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Heath C (2007) Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. J. Consumer Res. 34(2):121–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burn SM (1991) Social psychology and the stimulation of recycling behaviors: The block leader approach. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 21(8):611–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cialdini RB (2001) Influence: Science and Practice (Allyn & Bacon, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Clee MA, Wicklund RA (1980) Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. J. Consumer Res. 6(4):389–405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Saez E (2003) The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):815–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L (1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2):117–140.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D, Ofek E (2004) Case Study: Hasbro Games—POX. Harvard Business School Case 505-046.Google Scholar
  • Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Grewal D, Gotlieb J, Marmorstein H (1994) The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):145–153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grinblatt M, Keloharju M, Ikäheimo S (2008) Social influence and consumption: Evidence from the automobile purchases of neighbors. Rev. Econom. Statist. 90(4):735–753.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair H, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C (2008) Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 19(3–4):287–304.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong Y, Pavlou PA (2014) Product fit uncertainty in online markets: nature, effects, and antecedents. Inform. Systems Res. 25(2):328–344.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Laurin K, Kay AC, Fitzsimons GJ (2012) Reactance versus rationalization: Divergent responses to policies that constrain freedom. Psych. Sci. 23(2):205–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM (1990) New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing 54(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. 25(2):155–163.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Shin J (2011) Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Marketing Sci. 30(4):666–685.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muller E, Peres R, Mahajan V (2009) Innovation diffusion and new product growth. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Peres R, Muller E, Mahajan V (2010) Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 27(2):91–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pesendorfer W (1995) Design innovation and fashion cycles. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(4):771–792.Google Scholar
  • Shimp TA, Bearden WO (1982) Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers’ risk perceptions. J. Consumer Res. 9(1):38–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith JA, McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L (2014) Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985 to 2004. Amer. Soc. Rev. 79(3):432–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • White K, Dahl DW (2007) Are all out-groups created equal? Consumer identity and dissociative influence. J. Consumer Res. 34(4):525–536.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooten DB, Reed A II (1998) Informational influence and the ambiguity of product experience: Order effects on the weighting of evidence. J. Consumer Psych. 7(1):79–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.