Competition in Corruptible Markets

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2016.1017

References

  • Akerlof GA, Dickens WT (1982) The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. Amer. Econom. Rev. 72(3):307–319.Google Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Shin W (2011) Competing for low-end markets. Marketing Sci. 30(5):776–788.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baye MR, Kovenock D, de Vries CG (1993) Rigging the lobbying process: An application of the all-pay auction. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(1):289–294.Google Scholar
  • Beck PJ, Maher MW, Tschoegl AE (1991) The impact of the foreign corrupt practices act on U.S. exports. Managerial Decision Econom. 12(4):295–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bénabou R, Tirole J (2006) Incentives and prosocial behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(5):1652–1678.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Border KC, Sobel J (1987) Samurai accountant: A theory of auditing and plunder. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(4):525–540.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F, Villas-Boas JM (2015) Competitive vices. J. Marketing Res. 52(6):801–816.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burguet R, Che Y-K (2004) Competitive procurement with corruption. RAND J. Econom. 35(1):50–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compte O, Lambert-Mogiliansky A, Verdier T (2005) Corruption and competition in procurement auctions. RAND J. Econom. 36(1):1–15.Google Scholar
  • Deci EL (1972) Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 22(1):113–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durbin E, Iyer G (2009) Corruptible advice. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 1(2):220–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal-Or E (1995) Maintaining quality standards in franchise chains. Management Sci. 41(11):1774–1792.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gillespie K (1987) The Middle East response to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. California Management Rev. 29(4):9–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2000) Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):791–810.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graham JL (1984) The foreign corrupt practices act: A new perspective. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. 15(3):107–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser JR, Simester DI, Wernerfelt B (1997) Side payments in marketing. Marketing Sci. 16(3):246–255.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hines JR (1995) Forbidden payment: Foreign bribery and American business after 1977. Working Paper 5266, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2012) Competition through commissions and kickbacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):780–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain AK (2001) Corruption: A review. J. Econom. Surveys 15(1):71–121.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jain S (2008) Digital piracy: A competitive analysis. Marketing Sci. 27(4):610–626.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koenigsberg O, Kohli R, Montoya R (2010) Package size decisions. Management Sci. 56(3):485–494.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kroszner RS, Stratmann T (2005) Corporate campaign contributions, repeat giving, and the rewards to legislator reputation. J. Law Econom. 48(1):41–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R (1990) Improving channel coordination through franchising. Marketing Sci. 9(4):299–318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mazar N, Amir O, Ariely D (2008) The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):633–644.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mookherjee D, Png IPL (1995) Corruptible law enforcers: How should they be compensated? Econom. J. 105(428):145–159.Google Scholar
  • Narasimhan C (1988) Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. 61(4):427–449.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Y, Gong Q, Chen Y (2015) Untangling searchable and experiential quality responses to counterfeiting. Marketing Sci. 34(4):522–538.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rose-Ackerman S (1975) The economics of corruption. J. Public Econom. 4(2):187–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scharfstein DS, Stein JC (1990) Herd behavior and investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 80(3):465–479.Google Scholar
  • Schulze GG, Frank B (2003) Deterrence versus intrinsic motivation: Experimental evidence on the determinants of corruptibility. Econom. Governance 4(2):143–160.Google Scholar
  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Quart. J. Econom. 108(3):599–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sudhir K, Talukdar D (2015) The “Peter Pan syndrome” in emerging markets: The productivity-transparency trade-off in IT adoption. Marketing Sci. 34(4):500–521.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Townsend RM (1979) Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econom. Theory 21(2):265–293.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uslaner EM (2008) Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian HR (1980) A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(4):651–659.Google Scholar
  • Vernik DA, Purohit D, Desai PS (2011) Music downloads and the flip side of digital rights management. Marketing Sci. 30(6):1011–1027.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wei S-J (2000) How taxing is corruption on international investors? Rev. Econom. Statist. 82(1):1–11.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.