Signaling Virtue: Charitable Behavior Under Consumer Elective Pricing

References

• Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econom. J. 100(401):464–477.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andreoni J, Bernheim BD (2009) Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica 77(5):1607–1636.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arora N, Henderson T (2007) Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Sci. 26(4):514–531.Link, Google Scholar
• Aupperle KE, Carroll AB, Hatfield JD (1985) An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Acad. Management J. 28(2):446–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chalk A (2014) Humble Bundle supporters have donated more than $50 million to charity. PC Gamer (December 16), http://www.pcgamer.com/humble-bundle-supporters-have-donated-more-than-50-million-to-charity/.Google Scholar
• David P, Kline S, Dai Y (2005) Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model. J. Public Relations Res. 17(3):291–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelmann D, Strobel M (2004) Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):857–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Brown M, Fehnder C (2009) On reputation: A microfoundation of contract enforcement and price rigidity. Econom. J. 119(536):333–353.Google Scholar
• Fox CR, Ratner RK, Lieb DS (2005) How subjective grouping of options influences choice and allocation: Diversification bias and the phenomenon of partition dependence. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 134(4):538–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S, Fischhoff B (1998) Scope (in) sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk Decision Policy 3(2):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friestad M, Wright P (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Nelson LD, Brown A (2010) Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving. Science 329(5989):325–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy A, Gneezy U, Riener G, Nelson LD (2012) Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109(19):7236–7240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenwald AG, Breckler SJ (1985) To whom is the self presented. Schlenker BR, ed. The Self and Social Life (McGraw-Hill, New York), 126–145.Google Scholar
• Harris RJ, Joyce MA (1980) What’s fair? It depends on how you phrase the question. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 38(1):165–179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee CK, Rottenstreich Y (2004) Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. J. Experiment. Psych.: General 133(1):23–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imas A (2014) Working for the “warm glow”: On the benefits and limits of prosocial incentives. J. Public Econom. 114:14–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung MH, Perfecto H, Nelson LD (2016) Anchoring in payment: Evaluating a judgmental heuristic in field experimental settings. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):354–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jung MH, Nelson LD, Gneezy A, Gneezy U (2014) Paying more when paying for others. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 107(3):414–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Natter M, Spann M (2009) Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. J. Marketing 73(1):44–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• León FJ, Noguera JA, Tena-Sánchez J (2012) How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato. Soc. Sci. Inform. 51(3):389–417.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mak V, Zwick R, Rao AR (2010) “Pay what you want” as a profitable pricing strategy: Theory and experimental evidence. Proc. Management Sci. Oper. Seminar Ser. (Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Milinski M, Semmann D, Krambeck HJ (2002) Reputation helps solve the “tragedy of the commons.” Nature 415(6870):424–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohin TJ (2012) Changing Business from Inside to Out: A Treehugger’s Guide to Working in Corporations (Greenleaf, UK), 191–192.Google Scholar
• Nixon R (2008) Bottom line for (Red). New York Times (February 6), http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/business/06red.html?scp=1&sq=%22Product+Red%22&st=nyt&_r=0.Google Scholar
• Regner T, Barria JA (2009) Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 71(2):395–406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Regner T, Riener G (2012) Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the Internet: A natural field experiment. Discussion Paper 82, Dusseldorf Institute for Competition Economics, Dusseldorf, Germany.Google Scholar
• Reputation Institute (2013) CSR RepTrak. http://www.reputationinstitute.com/thought-leadership/global-reptrak-100.Google Scholar
• Schlenker BR (1986) Self-identification: Toward an integration of the private and public self. Baumeister R, ed. Public Self and Private Self (Springer, New York), 21–62.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt KM, Spann M, Zeithammer R (2015) Pay what you want as a marketing strategy in monopolistic and competitive markets. Management Sci. 61(6):1217–1236.Link, Google Scholar
• Sen S, Bhattacharya CB (2001) Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. 38(2):225–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Small DA, Loewenstein G, Slovic P (2007) Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes 102(2):143–153.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Social Investment Forum (2009) 2009 Report on socially responsible investing trends in the United States. Social Investment Forum, Washington, DC.Google Scholar