Add-on Policies Under Vertical Differentiation: Why Do Luxury Hotels Charge for Internet While Economy Hotels Do Not?
Published Online:31 Mar 2017https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2017.1028
References
- (1993) Why firms may prefer not to price discriminate via mixed bundling. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 11(1):49–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Competitive price discrimination. RAND J. Econom. 32(4):579–605.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Competitive non-linear pricing and bundling. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(1):30–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Why bundle discounts can be a profitable alternative to competing on price promotions. Marketing Sci. 29(4):624–638.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Provision of optional versus standard product features in competition. J. Marketing 81(3):80–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) The impact of add-on features on consumer product evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 36(1):17–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1989) Multiproduct duopolists. Econometrica 57(3):533–557.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Surcharges and seller reputation. J. Consumer Res. 35(1):167–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Individual marketing with imperfect targetability. Marketing Sci. 20(1):23–41.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly: All-out competition and strategic commitment. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):306–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Unshrouding for competitive advantage. J. Econom. Management Strategy 22(3):551–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Some hotels with free Wi-Fi consider charging for it. USA Today (June 22).Google Scholar
- (1971) A model of price adjustment. J. Econom. Theory 3(2):156–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Who should practice price discrimination using rebates in an asymmetric duopoly? Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(1):61–90.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) A model of add-on pricing. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):585–637.Google Scholar
- (2006) Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):505–540.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) What makes luxury apartments so expensive. Forbes (June 26).Google Scholar
- (2009) The price of staying connected. New York Times (May 6).Google Scholar
- (1994) Retail pricing and advertising strategies. J. Bus. 67(3):345–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Is a $1,000 haircut and blow dry worth it? Wall Street Journal (January 29).Google Scholar
- (1992) Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. J. Indust. Econom. 40(1):37–54.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Pay for Wi-Fi? Only at a luxury hotel. Wall Street Journal (February 18).Google Scholar
- (1998) Divide and prosper: Consumers’ reactions to partitioned prices. J. Marketing Res. 35(4):453–463.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory 18(2):301–317.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Nonlinear pricing with random participation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 69(1):277–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Competitive product lines with quality constraints. Quant. Marketing Econom. 6(1):1–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Drip pricing when consumers have limited foresight: Evidence from driving school fees. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
- (1995) Competitive coupon targeting. Marketing Sci. 14(4):395–416.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. 48(9):1143–1160.Link, Google Scholar
- (1982) Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 49(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Product line bundling: Why airlines bundle high-end while hotels bundle low-end. Marketing Sci. 36(1):124–139.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) Add-on pricing by asymmetric firms. Management Sci. 59(4):899–917.Link, Google Scholar
- (1995) Nonlinear pricing and oligopoly. J. Econom. Management Strategy 4(4):529–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
- (1999) Product line rivalry and market segmentation–with an application to automobile optional engine pricing. J. Indust. Econom. 47(4):399–425.Crossref, Google Scholar

