Does Offline TV Advertising Affect Online Chatter? Quasi-Experimental Analysis Using Synthetic Control

References

• Abadie A, Gardeazabal J (2003) The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):113–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2010) Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 105(490):493–505.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2011) Synth: An R package for synthetic control methods in comparative case studies. J. Statist. Software 42(13):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J (2015) Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Amer. J. Political Sci. 59(2):495–510.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aggarwal R, Gopal R, Sankaranarayanan R, Singh PV (2012) Blog, blogger, and the firm: Can negative employee posts lead to positive outcomes? Inform. Systems Res. 23(2):306–322.Link, Google Scholar
• Babic A, Sotgiu F, de Valck K, Bijmolt TH (2016) The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baker AM, Donthu N, Kumar V (2016) Investigating how word-of-mouth conversations about brands influence purchase and retransmission intentions. J. Marketing Res. 53(2):225–239.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Schwartz EM (2011) What drives immediate and ongoing word of mouth? J. Marketing Res. 48(5):869–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borah A, Tellis GJ (2014) Make, buy, or ally? Choice of and payoff from announcements of alternate strategies for innovations. Marketing Sci. 33(1):114–133.Link, Google Scholar
• Borah A, Tellis GJ (2016) Halo (spillover) effects in social media: Do product recalls of one brand hurt or help rival brands? J. Marketing Res. 53(2):143–160.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiou L, Tucker C (2012) How does the use of trademarks by third-party sellers affect online search? Marketing Sci. 31(5):819–837.Link, Google Scholar
• Deighton J, Schindler RM (1998) Can advertising influence experience? Psych. Marketing 5(2):103–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du RY, Kamakura WA (2012) Quantitative trendspotting. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):514–536.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Vol. 2 (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Gopinath S, Chintagunta PK, Venkataraman S (2013) Blogs, advertising, and local-market movie box office performance. Management Sci. 59(12):2635–2654.Link, Google Scholar
• Gopinath S, Thomas JS, Krishnamurthi L (2014) Investigating the relationship between the content of online word of mouth, advertising, and brand performance. Marketing Sci. 33(2): 241–258.Link, Google Scholar
• Hewett K, Rand W, Rust RT, van Heerde HJ (2016) Brand buzz in the echoverse. J. Marketing 80(3):1–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins ET, Rholes WS, Jones CR (1977) Category accessibility and impression formation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 13(2):141–154.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch SJ, Ha Y-W (1986) Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience. J. Consumer Res. 13(2):221–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Du RY, Damangir S (2014) Decomposing the impact of advertising: Augmenting sales with online search data. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):300–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J. Econom. Literature 47(1): 5–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Cowgill B, Zhu Y (2014) Television advertising and online search. Management Sci. 60(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Zubcsek PP, Sarvary M (2011) Network effects and personal influences: The diffusion of an online social network. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):425–443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kawasaki L (2015) The United States tops ad spending per capita in 2014 at USD$567 per person. Press release, Strategy Analytics, Boston (February 26), https://www.strategyanalytics.com/strategy-analytics/news/strategy-analytics-press-releases/strategy-analytics-press-release/2015/02/26/the-united-states-tops-ad-spending-per-capita-in-2014-at-usd$567-per-person.Google Scholar
• Kireyev P, Pauwels K, Gupta S (2016) Do display ads influence search? Attribution and dynamics in online advertising. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 33(3):475–490.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leskovec J, Backstrom L, Kleinberg J (2009) Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (ACM, New York),497–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Luan YJ, Sudhir K (2010) Forecasting marketing-mix responsiveness for new products. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):444–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Link to success: How blogs build an audience by promoting rivals. Management Sci. 58(9): 1651–1668.Link, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2013) Global trust in advertising and brand messages. http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2013/global-trust-in-advertising-and-brand-messages.html.Google Scholar
• O’Keefe DJ (1999) How to handle opposing arguments in persuasive messages: A meta-analytic review of the effects of one-sided and two-sided messages. Ann. Internat. Comm. Assoc. 29(1):209–249.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onishi H, Manchanda P (2012) Marketing activity, blogging and sales. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 29(3):221–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pauwels K, van Ewijk B (2014) Do online behavior tracking or attitude survey metrics drive brand sales? An integrative model of attitudes and actions on the consumer boulevard. Report 13-118, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Peters K, Chen Y, Kaplan AM, Ognibeni B, Pauwels K (2013) Social media metrics—A framework and guidelines for managing social media. J. Interactive Marketing 27(4):281–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roos JMT, Mela CF, Shachar R (2016) The effect of links and excerpts on Internet news consumption. Working paper, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Saboo AR, Chakravarty A, Grewal R (2016) Organizational debut on the public stage: Marketing myopia and initial public offerings. Marketing Sci. 35(4):656–675.Link, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Moe WW (2014) Listening in on social media: A joint model of sentiment and venue format choice. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):387–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethuraman R, Tellis GJ, Briesch RA (2011) How well does advertising work? Generalizations from meta-analysis of brand advertising elasticities. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):457–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Rutz OJ, Pauwels K (2016) Paths to and off purchase: Quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 44(4):440–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephen AT, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: A study of a microlending marketplace. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):624–639.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock JH, Watson MW (2011) Dynamic factor models. Clements MP, Hendry DF, eds. Oxford Handbook of Economic Forecasting (Oxford University Press, New York), 35–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tellis GJ (2003) Effective Advertising: Understanding When, How, and Why Advertising Works (Sage Publications, ThousandOaks, CA).Google Scholar
• Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2012) Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Marketing Sci. 31(2):198–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2014) Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):463–479.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. J. Marketing 73(5):90–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vranica S, Scheck J (2010) H-P to brandish its technology credentials. Wall Street Journal (March 11), http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704655004575114010908592910.Google Scholar