Personalization in Email Marketing: The Role of Noninformative Advertising Content

References

• Allport GW (1937) Personality (Holt, New York).Google Scholar
• Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2): 131–145.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Handbook Indust. Organ. 3:1701–1844.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J (2010) What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 125(1): 263–306.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bleier A, Eisenbeiss M (2015) Personalized online advertising effectiveness: The interplay of what, when, and where. Marketing Sci. 34(5):669–688.Link, Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braver SL, Thoemmes FJ, Rosenthal R (2014) Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspect. Psych. Sci. 9(3):333–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Kao CF, Rodriguez R (1986) Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 51(5):1032–1043.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cherry EC (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J. Acoustical Soc. America 25(5):975–979.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2010) Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Ann. Rev. Econom. 2(1):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deshpandé R, Stayman DM (1994) A tale of two cities: Distinctiveness theory and advertising effectiveness. J. Marketing Res. 31(1):57–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dijkstra A (2008) The psychology of tailoring-ingredients in computer-tailored persuasion. Soc. Personality Psych. Compass 2(2):765–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eastlack JO Jr, Rao AG (1989) Advertising experiments at the Campbell Soup company. Marketing Sci. 8(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Experian Marketing Services (2014) The coupon report: Benchmark data and analysis for e-mail marketers. Technical report. https://www.experian.com/assets/marketing-services/white-papers/EMS_coupon_report_WP.pdf.Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2011a) Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Sci. 30(3):389–404.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker C (2012) Privacy and innovation. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 12 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 65–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldfarb A, Tucker CE (2011b) Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Sci. 57(1):57–71.Link, Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt CP, Petty RE (1992) Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 63(2):308–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A (2008) Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Ed. Res. 23(3):454–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Vol. 5 (Wiley Online Library, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J. Political Econom. 98(6):1325–1348.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom JF, Cantor N (1984) Mental representations of the self. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 17:1–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2013) When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. J. Marketing Res. 50:561–576.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lodish LM, Abraham M, Kalmenson S, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995) How T.V. advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable T.V. advertising experiments. J. Marketing Res. 32(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus H (1977) Self-schemata and processing information about the self. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 35(2):63–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus H, Wurf E (1987) The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Rev. Psych. 38(1):299–337.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell AR (2011) The multiple self-aspects framework: Self-concept representation and its implications. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 15(1):3–27.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson P (1974) Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. 82(4): 729–754.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman RS (2005) The cocktail party effect in infants revisited: Listening to one’s name in noise. Developmental Psych. 41(2):352–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nuttin JM (1985) Narcissism beyond gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. 15(3):353–361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perloff RM, Brock TC (1980) And thinking makes it so: Cognitive responses to persuasion. Roloff ME, Miller GR, eds. Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA), 67–99.Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986a) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1986b) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT (1990) Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psych. Bull. 107(3):367–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Barden J, Wheeler SC (2009) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Health promotions that yield sustained behavioral change. DiClemente RJ, Crosby RA, Kegler M, eds. Emerging Theories in Health Promotion Practice and Research (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), 185–214.Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Haugtvedt CP (1992) Ego-involvement and persuasion: An appreciative look at the Sherif’s contribution to the study of self-relevance and attitude change. Granberg D, Sarup G, eds. Social Judgment and Intergroup Relations (Springer, New York), 147–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J. Consumer Res. 10(2):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Haugtvedt CP, Smith SM (1995) Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. Attitude Strength: Antecedents Consequences 4:93–130.Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Wheeler SC, Bizer G (2000) Matching effects in persuasion: An elaboration likelihood analysis. Maio G, Olson J, eds. Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ), 133–162.Google Scholar
• Petty RE, Wheeler SC, Tormala ZT (2013) Persuasion and attitude change. Weiner IB, Lerner MJ, eds. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 5 (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 369–390.Google Scholar
• Reed A (2004) Activating the self-importance of consumer selves: Exploring identity salience effects on judgments. J. Consumer Res. 31(2):286–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnik A, Stern BL (1977) An analysis of information content in television advertising. J. Marketing 41(1):50–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• SimpleRelevance (2014) Email fail: An in-depth evaluation of top 20 Internet retailers’ email personalization capabilities. SimpleRelevance Research Report. http://docplayer.net/1377895-Email-fail-an-in-depth-evaluation-of-top-20-internet-retailers-email-personalization-capabilities-abstract.html.Google Scholar
• Staats AW, Staats CK (1958) Attitudes established by classical conditioning. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. 57(1):37–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sudhir K, Roy S, Cherian M (2016) Do sympathy biases induce charitable giving? The effects of advertising content. Marketing Sci. 35(6):849–869.Link, Google Scholar
• Tacikowski P, Nowicka A (2010) Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study. Biol. Psych. 84(2):318–324.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker CE (2012) The economics of advertising and privacy. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 30(3):326–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker CE (2014) Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Marketing Res. 51(5):546–562.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wattal S, Telang R, Mukhopadhyay T, Boatwright P (2012) What’s in a “name”? Impact of use of customer information in e-mail advertisements. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3-part-1):679–697.Link, Google Scholar
• Wegener DT, Downing J, Krosnick JA, Petty RE (1995) Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. Attitude Strength: Antecedents Consequences 4:455–487.Google Scholar
• Wheeler SC, Petty RE, Bizer GY (2005) Self-schema matching and attitude change: Situational and dispositional determinants of message elaboration. J. Consumer Res. 31(4):787–797.Crossref, Google Scholar
• White TB, Zahay DL, Thorbjørnsen H, Shavitt S (2008) Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Lett. 19(1):39–50.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolford G, Morrison F (1980) Processing of unattended visual information. Memory Cognition 8(6):521–527.Crossref, Google Scholar