A Border Strategy Analysis of Ad Source and Message Tone in Senatorial Campaigns

References

• Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S (1995) Going Negative: How Political Advertising Shrinks and Polarizes the Electorate (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S, Simon A, Valentino N (1994) Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 88(4):829–838.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Rev. General Psych. 5(4):323–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belch GE (1981) An examination of comparative and noncomparative television commercials: The effects of claim variation and repetition on cognitive response and message acceptance. J. Marketing Res. 18(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blake A (2017) Trump’s media coverage has been 4-to-1 negative—but that isn’t really the point. Washington Post (May 19), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/05/19/coverage-of-president-trump-has-been-4-to-1-negative-but-that-isnt-really-the-point/?utm_term=.04f0e60006b8.Google Scholar
• Calder BJ, Phillips LW, Tybout AM (1982) The concept of external validity. J. Consumer Res. 9(3):240–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Zhang L (2016) The air war versus the ground game: An analysis of multi-channel marketing in U.S. presidential elections. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2010) Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Annual Rev. Econom. 2(1):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Kaplan E (2007) The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1187–1234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Swait J (1998) Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. J. Consumer Psych. 7(2):131–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Swait J (2004) Brand credibility, brand consideration, and choice. J. Consumer Res. 31(1):191–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fowler EF, Ridout TN (2014) Political advertising in 2014: The year of the outside group. Forum 12(4):663–684.Google Scholar
• Franz M, Ridout N (2007) Does political advertising persuade? Political Behav. 29(4):465–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franz M, Fowler EF, Ridout TN (2016) Loose cannons or loyal foot soldiers? Toward a more complex theory of interest group advertising strategies. Amer. J. Political Sci. 60(3):738–751.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelman A, King G (1993) Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable? British J. Political Sci. 23(4):409–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein K, Freedman P (2002) Campaign advertising and voter turnout: New evidence for a stimulation effect. J. Politics 64(3):721–740.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein K, Schweidel DA, Wittenwyler M (2011) Lessons learned: Political advertising and political. Univ. Minnesota Law Rev. 96(5):1732–1754.Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Hartmann WR (2013) Advertising effects in presidential elections. Marketing Sci. 32(1):19–35.Link, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Hartmann WR (2016) Advertising competition in presidential elections. Quant. Marketing Econom. 14(1):1–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Lovett MJ, Shachar R, Arceneaux K, Moorthy S, Peress M, Urminsky O (2012) Marketing and politics: Models, behavior, and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 23(2):391–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham DA (2016) Trump’s “voter suppression operation” targets black voters. Atlantic (October 27), https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/trumps-black-voter-dilemma/505586/.Google Scholar
• Hoegg J, Lewis M (2011) The impact of candidate appearance and advertising strategies on election results. J. Marketing Res. 48(5):895–909.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber GA, Arceneaux K (2007) Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising. Amer. J. Political Sci. 51(4):957–977.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson GC (1978) The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 72(2):469–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• James KE, Hensel PJ (1991) Negative advertising: The malicious strain of comparative advertising. J. Advertising 20(2):53–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein JG, Ahluwalia R (2005) Negativity in the evaluation of political candidates. J. Marketing 69(1):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krasno JS, Green DP (2008) Do televised presidential ads increase voter turnout? Evidence from a natural experiment. J. Politics 70(1):245–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau R, Sigelman L, Rovner IB (2007) The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. J. Politics 69(4):1176–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lau R, Sigelman L, Heldman C, Babbitt P (1999) The effects of negative political advertisement: A meta-analytic review. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. 93(December):851–875.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Shachar R (2011) The seeds of negativity: Knowledge and money. Marketing Sci. 30(3):430–446.Link, Google Scholar
• Marcus R (2012) Super PACs are a dangerous new weapon. Washington Post (January 3), https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/super-pacs-are-a-dangerous-new-weapon/2012/01/03/gIQAfGVDZP_story.html.Google Scholar
• Merritt S (1984) Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. J. Advertising 13(3):27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Price and advertising signals of product quality. J. Political Econom. 94(4):796–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Connor P (2014) Political ads take targeting to the next level. Wall Street Journal (July 14), http://www.wsj.com/articles/political-ads-take-targeting-to-the-next-level-1405381606.Google Scholar
• Painter DL (2014) Collateral damage involvement and the effects of negative super PAC advertising. Amer. Behav. Scientist 58(4):510–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petty R, Cacioppo J, Schumann D (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J. Consumer Res. 10(2):135–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfau M, Park D, Holbert RL, Cho J (2001) The effects of party- and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. Amer. Behav. Scientist 44(12):2379–2397.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Royzman EB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(4):296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT (2018) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. J. Political Econom. 126(1):381–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skowronski J, Carlston DE (1989) Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psych. Bull. 105(1):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorescu AB, Gelb BD (2000) Negative comparative advertising: Evidence favoring fine-tuning. J. Advertising 29(4):25–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spenkuch JL, Toniatti D (2018) Political advertising and election outcomes. Quart. J. Econom. Forthcoming.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stightz J (1987) The causes and consequences of the dependence of quality on price. J. Econom. Literature 25(1):1–48.Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69(3):213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomson M (2006) Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. J. Marketing 70(3):104–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tormala ZL, Briñol P, Petty RE (2006) When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 42(5):684–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuchman A (2017) Advertising and demand for addictive goods: The effects of e-cigarette advertising. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
• Weber C, Dunaway J, Johnson T (2012) It’s all in the name: Source cue ambiguity and the persuasive appeal of campaign ads. Political Behav. 34(3):561–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winneg KM, Hardy BW, Gottfried JA, Jamieson KH (2014) Deception in third party advertising in the 2012 presidential campaign. Amer. Behav. Scientist 58(4):524–535.Crossref, Google Scholar