Explaining Bundle-Framing Effects with Signaling Theory

References

• Adams WJ, Yellen JL (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. 90(3):475–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson C (2009) Free: The Future of a Radical Price (Hyperion, New York).Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Dana JD Jr (2009) When is price discrimination profitable? Management Sci. 55(6):980–989.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester DI (1998) The role of sale signs. Marketing Sci. 17(2):139–155.Link, Google Scholar
• Arora R (2011) Bundling or unbundling frequently purchased products: A mixed method approach. J. Consumer Marketing 28(1):67–75.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell K, Riordan MH (1991) High and declining prices signal product quality. Amer. Econom. Rev. 81(1):224–239.Google Scholar
• Banciu M, Gal-Or E, Mirchandani P (2010) Bundling strategies when products are vertically differentiated and capacities are limited. Management Sci. 56(12):2207–2223.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho IK, Kreps DM (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):179–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (2003) Bundling new products with old to signal quality, with application to the sequencing of new products. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 21(8):1179–1200.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dant RP, Kacker M, Coughlan AT, Emerson J (2007) A cointegration analysis of the correlates of performance in franchised channels. Cliquet G, Tuunanen M, Hendrikse G, Windsperger J, eds. Economics and Management of Networks (Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg, Germany), 169–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G (2005) A model of add-on pricing. Quart. J. Econom. 120(2):585–637.Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Ellison SF (2009) Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. Econometrica 77(2):427–452.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G, Wolitzky A (2012) A search cost model of obfuscation. RAND J. Econom. 43(3):417–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fruchter GE, Gerstner E, Dobson PW (2011) Fee or free? How much to add on for an add-on. Marketing Lett. 22(1):65–78.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaeth GJ, Levin IP, Chakraborty G, Levin AM (1991) Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysis. Marketing Lett. 2(1):47–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton RW, Koukova NT (2008) Choosing options for products: The effects of mixed bundling on consumers’ inferences and choices. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 36(3):423–433.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heeler RM, Nguyen A, Buff C (2007) Bundles = discount? Revisiting complex theories of bundle effects. J. Product Brand Management 16(7):492–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holdnak A, Jewett H (1994) The impacts of “all inclusive pricing” on selected resort recreation participation. Visions Leisure Bus. 13(2):13–18.Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Kuksov D (2010) Consumer feelings and equilibrium product quality. J. Econom. Management Strategy 19(1):137–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Ni J, Srinivasan K (2014) Signaling through pricing by service providers with social preferences. Marketing Sci. 33(5):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson JP, Myatt DP (2003) Multiproduct quality competition: Fighting brands and product line pruning. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):748–774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson MD, Herrmann A, Bauer HH (1999) The effects of price bundling on consumer evaluations of product offerings. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 16(2):129–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kachersky L, Kim HM (2010) When consumers cope with price-persuasion knowledge: The role of topic knowledge. J. Marketing Management 27(1–2):28–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A (2000) Choices, Values, and Frames (Cambridge University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E (2008) Contextual inference in markets: On the informational content of product lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):2127–2149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom RE, Riordan MH (1984) Advertising as a signal. J. Political Econom. 92(3):427–450.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Shachar R, Wang K (2013) Advertising and consumers’ communications. Marketing Sci. 32(2):294–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Lin S (2017) Add-on policies under vertical differentiation: Why do luxury hotels charge for Internet whereas economy hotels do not? Marketing Sci. 36(4):610–625.Link, Google Scholar
• McQuilken L, Robertson N, Polonsky M, Harrison P (2015) Consumer perceptions of bundles and time-limited promotion deals: Do contracts matter? J. Consumer Behav. 14(3):145–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merchant S (2011) Negotiating underwater space: The sensorium, the body and the practice of scuba-diving. Tourist Stud. 11(3):215–234.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal J, Zhang J (2013) (De)marketing to manage consumer quality inferences. J. Marketing Res. 50(1):55–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milewicz J, Herbig P (1996) Differences in market signaling behavior between manufacturers and service firms. J. Professional Services Marketing 14(2):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Price and advertising signals of product quality. J. Political Econom. 94(4):796–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S, Srinivasan K (1995) Signaling quality with a money-back guarantee: The role of transaction costs. Marketing Sci. 14(4):442–466.Link, Google Scholar
• Naylor G, Frank KE (2001) The effect of price bundling on consumer perceptions of value. J. Services Marketing 15(4):270–281.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmeira MM, Srivastava J (2013) Free offer ≠ cheap product: A selective accessibility account on the valuation of free offers. J. Consumer Res. 40(4):644–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Wernerfelt B, Zettelmeyer F (1997) The role of inference in context effects: Inferring what you want from what is available. J. Consumer Res. 24(1):118–125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinders MJ, Frambach RT, Schoormans JP (2010) Using product bundling to facilitate the adoption process of radical innovations. J. Product Innovation Management 27(7):1127–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repetti T, Roe S, Gregory A (2015) Pricing strategies for resort fees: Consumer preferences favor simplicity. Internat. J. Contemporary Hospitality Management 27(5):790–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin S, Sego T, Chanvarasuth N (2003) Strategic use of bundling for reducing consumers’ perceived risk associated with the purchase of new high-tech products. J. Marketing Theory Practice 11(3):71–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seidl A, Guiliano F, Pratt L (2007) Cruising for colones: Cruise tourism economics in Costa Rica. Tourism Econom. 13(1):67–85.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shampanier K, Mazar N, Ariely D (2007) Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Sci. 26(6):742–757.Link, Google Scholar
• Shugan SM, Moon J, Shi Q, Kumar N (2017) Product line bundling: Why airlines bundle high-end while hotels bundle low-end? Marketing Sci. 36(1):124–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Shulman JD, Geng X (2013) Add-on pricing by asymmetric firms. Management Sci. 59(4):899–917.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. J. Consumer Res. 16(2):158–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soberman DA (2003) Simultaneous signaling and screening with warranties. J. Marketing Res. 40(2):176–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence M (1973) Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. 87(3):355–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stock A, Balachander S (2005) The making of a “hot product”: A signaling explanation of marketers’ scarcity strategy. Management Sci. 51(8):1181–1192.Link, Google Scholar
• Tait D (2016) When free is not easy. Travel Industry Today (May 5), http://travelindustrytoday.com/2016-05-05-when-free-is-not-easy::23879.Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1988) Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):458–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1995) A rational reconstruction of the compromise effect: Using market data to infer utilities. J. Consumer Res. 21(4):627–633.Crossref, Google Scholar