Multimarket Value Creation and Competition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1127

References

  • Amaldoss W, Staelin R (2010) Cross-function and same-function alliances: How does alliance structure affect the behavior of partnering firms? Management Sci. 56(2):302–317.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W, Meyer RJ, Raju J, Rapoport A (2000) Collaborating to compete. Marketing Sci. 19(2):105–126.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bass FM, Krishnamoorthy A, Prasad A, Sethi SP (2005) Generic and brand advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly. Marketing Sci. 24(4):556–568.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baye M, Kovenock D, de Vries C (1994) The solution to the Tullock rent-seeking game when R> 2: Mixed-strategy equilibria and mean dissipation rates. Public Choice 81(3/4):363–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell DE, Keeney RL, Little JDC (1975) A market share theorem. J. Marketing Res. 12(2):136–141.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berndt ER, Bui L, Reiley DR, Urban GL (1995) Information, marketing, and pricing in the U.S. antiulcer drug market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 85(2):100–105.Google Scholar
  • Borel E (1921) La théorie du jeu les équations intégrales à noyau symétrique. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie 173(25):1304–1308; English translation by Savage L (1953) The theory of play and integral equations with skew symmetric kernels. Econometrica 21(1):97–100.Google Scholar
  • Borel E, Ville J (1938) Application de la théorie des probabilitiés aux jeux de hasard (Gauthier-Villars, Paris), reprinted in Borel E, Chéron A eds. Théorie Mathematique du Bridge à la Portée de Tous (Editions Jacques Gabay, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Chen H, Lim N (2013) Should managers use team-based contests? Management Sci. 59(12):2823–2836.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark DJ, Konrad KA (2007) Contests with multi-tasking. Scandinavian J. Econom. 109(2):303–319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Friedman L (1958) Game-theory models in the allocation of advertising expenditures. Oper. Res. 6(5):699–709.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fu Q, Lu J (2012) The optimal multi-stage contests. Econom. Theory 51(2):351–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfinkel MR, Skaperdas S (2007) Economics of conflict: An overview. Sandler T, Hartley K, eds. Handbook of Defense Economics, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 649–709.Google Scholar
  • Gordon BR, Hartmann WR (2016) Advertising competition in presidential elections. Quant. Marketing Econom. 4(1):1–40.Google Scholar
  • Gradstein M, Konrad K (1999) Orchestrating rent seeking contests. Econom. J. 109(458):536–545.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gross OA, Wagner RA (1950) A continuous Colonel Blotto game. Technical Report RM-408, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
  • Hirshleifer J (1988) The analytics of continuing conflict. Synthese 76(2):201–233.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hirshleifer J (1994) The dark side of the force. Econom. Inquiry 32(1):1–10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iizuka T, Jin GZ (2005) The effect of prescription drug advertising on doctor visits. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(3):701–727.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer G, Katona Z (2016) Competing for attention in social communication markets. Management Sci. 62(8):2304–2320.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer G, Soberman D, Villas-Boas MJ (2005) The targeting of advertising. Marketing Sci. 24(3):461–476.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Joshi YV, Reibstein DJ, Zhang ZJ (2016) Turf wars: Product line strategies in competitive markets. Marketing Sci. 35(1):128–141.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kalra A, Shi M (2001) Designing optimal sales contests: A theoretical perspective. Marketing Sci. 20(2):170–193.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katona Z, Knee J, Sarvary M (2017) Agenda chasing and contests among news providers. RAND J. Econom. 48(3):783–809.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad KA (2009) Strategy and Dynamics in Contests (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kvasov D (2007) Contests with limited resources. J. Econom. Theory 136(1):738–748.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lake M (1978) A new campaign resource allocation model. Reprinted in Brams SJ, Schotter A, Schwodiauer G, eds. Applied Game Theory (Physica, Wurzburg, Germany).Google Scholar
  • Lim N, Ahearne M, Ham S (2009) Designing sales contests: Does the prize structure matter? J. Marketing Res. 46(3):356–371.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu Q, Gupta S (2011) The impact of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs on physician visits and drug requests: Empirical findings and public policy implications. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 28(3):205–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ridlon R, Shin J (2013) Favoring the winner or loser in repeated contests. Marketing Sci. 32(5):768–785.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Roberson B, Kvasov D (2012) The non-constant-sum Colonel Blotto game. Econom. Theory 51(2):397–433.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheremeta R, Masters WA, Cason TN (2018) Winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: Theory and experimental results. J. Econom. Behav. Organ., ePub ahead of print February 5, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.01.023.Google Scholar
  • Skaperdas S (1992) Cooperation, conflict, and power in the absence of property rights. Amer. Econom. Rev. 82(4):720–739.Google Scholar
  • Snyder JM (1989) Election goals and the allocation of campaign resources. Econometrica 57(3):637–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stromberg D (2008) How the electoral college influences campaigns and policy: The probability of being Florida. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):769–807.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tullock G (1980) Efficient rent seseking. Buchanan J, Tollison R, Tullock G, eds. Towards a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (Texas A&M University Press, College Station), 97–112.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.