Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments

References

• Adams MA, Pelletier RL, Zive MM, Sallis JF (2005) Salad bars and fruit and vegetable consumption in elementary schools: A plate waste study. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 105(11):1789–1792.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afshin A, Peñalvo JL, Del Gobbo L, Silva J, Michaelson M, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S, Spiegelman D, Danaei G, Mozaffarian D (2017) The prospective impact of food pricing on improving dietary consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12(3):e0172277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anzman-Frasca S, Braun AC, Ehrenberg S, Epstein LH, Gampp A, Leone LA, Singh A, Tauriello S (2018) Effects of a randomized intervention promoting healthy children’s meals on children’s ordering and dietary intake in a quick-service restaurant. Physiology Behav. 192:109–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arno A, Thomas S (2016) The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 16(1):676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Auchincloss AH, Mallya GG, Leonberg BL, Ricchezza A, Glanz K, Schwarz DF (2013) Customer responses to mandatory menu labeling at full-service restaurants. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 45(6):710–719.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry TE, Howard DJ (1990) A review and critique of the hierarchy of effects in advertising. Internat. J. Advertising 9(2):121–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartholomew JB, Jowers EM (2006) Increasing frequency of lower-fat entrees offered at school lunch: An environmental change strategy to increase healthful selections. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 106(2):248–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartley M (2017) Health Inequality: An Introduction to Concepts, Theories and Methods (Polity, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
• Baskin E, Gorlin M, Chance Z, Novemsky N, Dhar R, Huskey K, Hatzis M (2016) Proximity of snacks to beverages increases food consumption in the workplace: A field study. Appetite 103:244–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insight Team. (2014) East: Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insights (Behavioural Insight Team, London).Google Scholar
• Bloom D, Cafiero E, Jané-Llopis E, Abrahams-Gessel S, Bloom L, Fathima S, Feigl A, Gaziano T, Hamandi A, Mowafi M (2012) The Global Economic Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases (World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland).Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 3(1):91–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Booth A (2006) Clear and present questions: Formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech 24(3):355–368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to Meta-Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandon A, Ferraro PJ, List JA, Metcalfe RD, Price MK, Rundhammer F 2017. Do the effects of social nudges persist? Theory and evidence from 38 natural field experiments. NBER Working Paper Series No. 23277 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Breckler SJ (1984) Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 47(6):1191–1205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer NT, Chapman GB, Rothman AJ, Leask J, Kempe A (2017) Increasing vaccination: Putting psychological science into action. Psych. Sci. Public Interest 18(3):149–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brissette I, Lowenfels A, Noble C, Spicer D (2013) Predictors of total calories purchased at fast-food restaurants: Restaurant characteristics, calorie awareness, and use of calorie information. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 45(5):404–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broers VJ, De Breucker C, Van den Broucke S, Luminet O (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice. Eur. J. Public Health 27(5):912–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bucher T, Collins C, Rollo ME, McCaffrey TA, De Vlieger N, Van der Bend D, Truby H, Perez-Cueto FJ (2016) Nudging consumers toward healthier choices: A systematic review of positional influences on food choice. British J. Nutrition 115(12):2252–2263.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buscher LA, Martin KA, Crocker S (2001) Point-of-purchase messages framed in terms of cost, convenience, taste, and energy improve healthful snack selection in a college foodservice setting. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 101(8):909–913.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter CJ (2010) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Comm. 25(8):661–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cawley J, Sweeney MJ, Sobal J, Just DR, Kaiser HM, Schulze WD, Wethington E, Wansink B (2015) The impact of a supermarket nutrition rating system on purchases of nutritious and less nutritious foods. Public Health Nutrition 18(1):8–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cecchini M, Warin L (2016) Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Obesity Rev. 17(3):201–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chance Z, Gorlin M, Dhar R (2014) Why choosing healthy foods is hard, and how to help: Presenting the 4Ps framework for behavior change. Customer Needs Solutions 1(4):253–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandon P, Hutchinson JW, Bradlow ET, Young SH (2009) Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J. Marketing 73(6):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chernev A (2011) The dieter’s paradox. J. Consumer Psych. 21(2):178–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheung MWL (2014) Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psych. Methods 19(2):211–229.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu YH, Frongillo EA, Jones SJ, Kaye GL (2009) Improving patrons’ meal selections through the use of point-of-selection nutrition labels. Amer. J. Public Health 99(11):2001–2005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Cohen JF, Richardson SA, Cluggish SA, Parker E, Catalano PJ, Rimm EB (2015) Effects of choice architecture and chef-enhanced meals on the selection and consumption of healthier school foods: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatrics 169(5):431–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crockett RA, Jebb SA, Hankins M, Marteau TM (2014) The impact of nutritional labels and socioeconomic status on energy intake. An experimental field study. Appetite 81:12–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croll JK, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M (2001) Healthy eating: What does it mean to adolescents? J. Nutrition Edu. 33(4):193–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dayan E, Bar-Hillel M (2011) Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders. Judgment Decision Making 6(4):333–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bondt C, Van Kerckhove A, Geuens M (2017) ‘My lips are sealed’—The impact of package resealability on the consumption of tempting foods. Appetite 117:143–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Wijk RA, Maaskant AJ, Polet IA, Holthuysen NT, van Kleef E, Vingerhoeds MH (2016) An in-store experiment on the effect of accessibility on sales of wholegrain and white bread in supermarkets. PLoS One 11(3):e0151915.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ (2004) Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obesity 12(3):562–568.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiSantis KI, Birch LL, Davey A, Serrano EL, Zhang J, Bruton Y, Fisher JO (2013) Plate size and children’s appetite: Effects of larger dishware on self-served portions and intake. Pediatrics 131(5):e1451–e1458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Metcalfe R, Vlaev I (2012) Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way. J. Econom. Psych. 33(1):264–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Donnelly GE, Zatz LY, Svirsky D, John LK (2018) The effect of graphic warnings on sugary-drink purchasing. Psych. Sci. 29(8):1321–1333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downs JS, Wisdom J, Wansink B, Loewenstein G (2013) Supplementing menu labeling with calorie recommendations to test for facilitation effects. Amer. J. Public Health 103(9):1604–1609.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubbert PM, Johnson WG, Schlundt DG, Montague NW (1984) The influence of caloric information on cafeteria food choices. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 17(1):85–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duckworth AL, Gendler TS, Gross JJ (2016) Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives Psych. Sci. 11(1):35–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dumanovsky T, Huang CY, Nonas CA, Matte TD, Bassett MT, Silver LD (2011) Changes in energy content of lunchtime purchases from fast food restaurants after introduction of calorie labelling: Cross sectional customer surveys. BMJ 343:d4464.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elbel B, Gyamfi J, Kersh R (2011) Child and adolescent fast-food choice and the influence of calorie labeling: A natural experiment. Internat. J. Obesity 35(4):493–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elbel B, Kersh R, Brescoll VL, Dixon LB (2009) Calorie labeling and food choices: A first look at the effects on low-income people in New York City. Health Affairs 28(6):w1110–w1121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elbel B, Mijanovich T, Dixon LB, Abrams C, Weitzman B, Kersh R, Auchincloss AH, Ogedegbe G (2013) Calorie labeling, fast food purchasing and restaurant visits. Obesity 21(11):2172–2179.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison B, Lusk JL, Davis D (2013) Looking at the label and beyond: The effects of calorie labels, health consciousness, and demographics on caloric intake in restaurants. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 10(1):21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbernd S, Reicks M, Mann T, Redden J, Mykerezi E, Vickers Z (2016) Serving vegetables first: A strategy to increase vegetable consumption in elementary school cafeterias. Appetite 96:111–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ensaff H, Homer M, Sahota P, Braybrook D, Coan S, McLeod H (2015) Food choice architecture: An intervention in a secondary school and its impact on students’ plant-based food choices. Nutrients 7(6):4426–4437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farley JU, Lehmann DR, Mann LH (1998) Designing the next study for maximum impact. J. Marketing Res. 35(4):496–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fernandes AC, Oliveira RC, Proença RPC, Curioni CC, Rodrigues VM, Fiates GMR (2016) Influence of menu labeling on food choices in real-life settings: A systematic review. Nutrition Rev. 74(8):534–548.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finkelstein EA, Strombotne KL, Chan NL, Krieger J (2011) Mandatory menu labeling in one fast-food chain in King County, Washington. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 40(2):122–127.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foster GD, Karpyn A, Wojtanowski AC, Davis E, Weiss S, Brensinger C, Tierney A, et al.. (2014) Placement and promotion strategies to increase sales of healthier products in supermarkets in low-income, ethnically diverse neighborhoods: A randomized controlled trial. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 99(6):1359–1368.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freedman MR (2011) Point-of-selection nutrition information influences choice of portion size in an all-you-can-eat university dining hall. J. Foodservice Bus. Res. 14(1):86–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freedman MR, Brochado C (2010) Reducing portion size reduces food intake and plate waste. Obesity 18(9):1864–1866.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friis R, Skov LR, Olsen A, Appleton KM, Saulais L, Dinnella C, Hartwell H, et al.. (2017) Comparison of three nudge interventions (priming, default option, and perceived variety) to promote vegetable consumption in a self-service buffet setting. PLoS One 12(5):e0176028.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaigi H, Raffin S, Maillot M, Adrover L, Ruffieux B, Darmon N (2015) Expérimentation d’un fléchage nutritionnel dans deux supermarchés à marseille «le choix vita+. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique. 50(1):16–24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamburzew A, Darcel N, Gazan R, Dubois C, Maillot M, Tomé D, Raffin S, Darmon N (2016) In-store marketing of inexpensive foods with good nutritional quality in disadvantaged neighborhoods: Increased awareness, understanding, and purchasing. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 13(1):104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geaney F, Kelly C, Di Marrazzo JS, Harrington JM, Fitzgerald AP, Greiner BA, Perry IJ (2016) The effect of complex workplace dietary interventions on employees’ dietary intakes, nutrition knowledge and health status: A cluster controlled trial. Preventive Medicine. 89:76–83.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glanz K, Basil M, Maibach E, Goldberg J, Snyder DAN (1998) Why Americans eat what they do: Taste, nutrition, cost, convenience, and weight control concerns as influences on food consumption. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 98(10):1118–1126.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goto K, Waite A, Wolff C, Chan K, Giovanni M (2013) Do environmental interventions impact elementary school students’ lunchtime milk selection? Appl. Econom. Perspectives Policy 35(2):360–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene KN, Gabrielyan G, Just DR, Wansink B (2017) Fruit-promoting smarter lunchrooms interventions: Results from a cluster rct. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 52(4):451–458.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagen L, Krishna A, McFerran B (2016) Rejecting responsibility: Low physical involvement in obtaining food promotes unhealthy eating. J. Marketing Res. 54(4):589–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanks AS, Just DR, Wansink B (2013) Smarter lunchrooms can address new school lunchroom guidelines and childhood obesity. J. Pediatrics 162(4):867–869.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanks AS, Just DR, Smith LE, Wansink B (2012) Healthy convenience: Nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. J. Public Health 34(3):370–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanssens DM, Pauwels KH, Srinivasan S, Vanhuele M, Yildirim G (2014) Consumer attitude metrics for guiding marketing mix decisions. Marketing Sci. 33(4):534–550.Link, Google Scholar
• Herman CP, Polivy J (2008) External cues in the control of food intake in humans: The sensory-normative distinction. Physiology Behav. 94(5):722–728.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herman CP, Roth DA, Polivy J (2003) Effects of the presence of others on food intake: A normative interpretation. Psych. Bull. 129(6):873–886.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Higgins J, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statist. Medicine 21(11):1539–1558.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hilgard ER (1980) The trilogy of mind: Cognition, affection, and conation. J. History Behav. Sci. 16(2):107–117.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoefkens C, Lachat C, Kolsteren P, Van Camp J, Verbeke W (2011) Posting point-of-purchase nutrition information in university canteens does not influence meal choice and nutrient intake. Amer. J. Clinical Nutrition 94(2):562–570.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holden SS, Zlatevska N, Dubelaar C (2016) Whether smaller plates reduce consumption depends on who’s serving and who’s looking: A meta-analysis. J. Assoc. Consumer Res. 1(1):134–146.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollands G, Bignardi G, Johnston M, Kelly M, Ogilvie D, Petticrew M, Prestwich A, Shemilt I, Sutton S, Marteau T (2017) The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nature Human Behav. 1:0140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollands GJ, Prestwich A, Marteau TM (2011) Using aversive images to enhance healthy food choices and implicit attitudes: An experimental test of evaluative conditioning. Health Psych. 30(2):195–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Nakamura R, Suhrcke M, Ogilvie D (2013) Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: Toward an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health 13(1):1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollands GJ, Shemilt I, Marteau TM, Jebb SA, Lewis HB, Wei Y, Higgins JP, Ogilvie D (2015) Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database System Rev. 9:CD011045.Google Scholar
• Hubbard KL, Bandini LG, Folta SC, Wansink B, Eliasziw M, Must A (2015) Impact of a smarter lunchroom intervention on food selection and consumption among adolescents and young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in a residential school setting. Public Health Nutrition 18(2):361–371.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson D, Riley R, White IR (2011) Multivariate meta‐analysis: Potential and promise. Statist. Medicine 30(20):2481–2498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Januszewska R, Pieniak Z, Verbeke W (2011) Food choice questionnaire revisited in four countries. Does it still measure the same? Appetite 57(1):94–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kees J, Burton S, Andrews JC, Kozup J (2006) Tests of graphic visuals and cigarette package warning combinations: Implications for the framework convention on tobacco control. J. Public Policy Marketing 25(2):212–223.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesel K, Villas-Boas SB (2013) Can information costs affect consumer choice? Nutritional labels in a supermarket experiment. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 31(2):153–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraak VI, Englund T, Misyak S, Serrano EL (2017) A novel marketing mix and choice architecture framework to nudge restaurant customers toward healthy food environments to reduce obesity in the united states. Obesity Rev. 18(8):852–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krieger JW, Chan NL, Saelens BE, Ta ML, Solet D, Fleming DW (2013) Menu labeling regulations and calories purchased at chain restaurants. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 44(6):595–604.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A (2012) An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. J. Consumer Psych. 22(3):332–351.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroese FM, Marchiori DR, de Ridder DT (2016) Nudging healthy food choices: A field experiment at the train station. J. Public Health 38(2):e133–e137.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lachat CK, Verstraeten R, De Meulenaer B, Menten J, Huybregts LF, Van Camp J, Roberfroid D, Kolsteren PW (2009) Availability of free fruits and vegetables at canteen lunch improves lunch and daily nutritional profiles: A randomised controlled trial. British J. Nutrition 102(07):1030–1037.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin S (1996) Pilot study of a cafeteria program relying primarily on symbols to promote healthy choices. J. Nutrition Ed. 28(5):282–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy DE, Riis J, Sonnenberg LM, Barraclough SJ, Thorndike AN (2012) Food choices of minority and low-income employees: A cafeteria intervention. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 43(3):240–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Littlewood JA, Lourenço S, Iversen CL, Hansen GL (2016) Menu labelling is effective in reducing energy ordered and consumed: A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent studies. Public Health Nutrition 19(12):2106–2121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Bryce C, Hagmann D, Rajpal S (2015) Warning: You are about to be nudged. Behav. Sci. Policy 1(1):35–42.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long MW, Tobias DK, Cradock AL, Batchelder H, Gortmaker SL (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of restaurant menu calorie labeling. Amer. J. Public Health 105(5):e11–e24.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ly K, Mazar N, Zhao M, Soman D 2013. A Practitioner’s Guide to Nudging. Research Report Series, Behavioural Economics in Action (University of Toronto Press, Toronto).Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Ailawadi KL, Grewal D (2013) Soda vs. cereal and sugar vs. fat: Drivers of healthful food intake and the impact of diabetes diagnosis. J. Marketing 77(3):101–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macht M (2008) How emotions affect eating: A five-way model. Appetite 50(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer JA, Heins JM, Vogel JM, Morrison DC, Lankester LD, Jacobs AL (1986) Promoting low-fat entree choices in a public cafeteria. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 19(4):397–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mazza MC, Dynan L, Siegel RM, Tucker AL (2017) Nudging healthier choices in a hospital cafeteria: Results from a field study. Health Promotion Practice 19(6):925–934.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFerran B, Dahl DW, Fitzsimons GJ, Morales AC (2010) Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption. J. Consumer Psych. 20(2):146–151.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyers AW, Stunkard AJ (1980) Food accessibility and food choice: A test of Schachter’s externality hypothesis. Arch. General Psychiatry 37(10):1133–1135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GF, Gupta S, Kropp JD, Grogan KA, Mathews A (2016) The effects of pre-ordering and behavioral nudges on national school lunch program participants’ food item selection. J. Econom. Psych. 55:4–16.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Mishra H, Masters TM (2012) The influence of bite size on quantity of food consumed: A field study. J. Consumer Res. 38(5):791–795.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6(7):e1000097.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollen S, Rimal RN, Ruiter RA, Kok G (2013) Healthy and unhealthy social norms and food selection. Findings from a field-experiment. Appetite 65:83–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morizet D, Depezay L, Combris P, Picard D, Giboreau A (2012) Effect of labeling on new vegetable dish acceptance in preadolescent children. Appetite 59(2):399–402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murimi MW, Kanyi M, Mupfudze T, Amin MR, Mbogori T, Aldubayan K (2017) Factors influencing efficacy of nutrition education interventions: A systematic review. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 49(2):142–165.e1.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikolaou CK, Hankey CR, Lean MEJ (2014) Calorie-labelling: Does it impact on calorie purchase in catering outlets and the views of young adults? Internat. J. Obesity 39:542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nikolova HD, Inman JI (2015) Healthy choice: The effect of simplified POS nutritional information on consumer food choice behavior. J. Marketing Res. 52(6):817–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nornberg TR, Houlby L, Skov LR, Perez-Cueto FJ (2016) Choice architecture interventions for increased vegetable intake and behaviour change in a school setting: A systematic review. Perspectives Public Health 136(3):132–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ogawa Y, Tanabe N, Honda A, Azuma T, Seki N, Suzuki T, Suzuki H (2011) Point-of-purchase health information encourages customers to purchase vegetables: Objective analysis by using a point-of-sales system. Environ. Health Preventive Medicine 16(4):239–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver RL (1999) Whence consumer loyalty? J. Marketing 63:33–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olstad DL, Goonewardene LA, McCargar LJ, Raine KD (2014) Choosing healthier foods in recreational sports settings: A mixed methods investigation of the impact of nudging and an economic incentive. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 11(1):6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olstad DL, Vermeer J, McCargar LJ, Prowse RJ, Raine KD (2015) Using traffic light labels to improve food selection in recreation and sport facility eating environments. Appetite 91:329–335.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouellette JA, Wood W (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psych. Bull. 124(1):54–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry CL, Bishop DB, Taylor GL, Davis M, Story M, Gray C, Bishop SC, Mays RAW, Lytle LA, Harnack L (2004) A randomized school trial of environmental strategies to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption among children. Health Ed. Behav. 31(1):65–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Policastro P, Smith Z, Chapman G (2015) Put the healthy item first: Order of ingredient listing influences consumer selection. J. Health Psych. 22(7):853–863.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Policastro P, Palm T, Schwartz J, Chapman G (2017) Targeted calorie message promotes healthy beverage consumption better than charity incentive. Obesity 25(8):1428–1434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D, Loewenstein G (1998) The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Sci. 17(1):4–28.Link, Google Scholar
• Pulos E, Leng K (2010) Evaluation of a voluntary menu-labeling program in full-service restaurants. Amer. J. Public Health 100(6):1035–1039.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redden JP, Mann T, Vickers Z, Mykerezi E, Reicks M, Elsbernd S (2015) Serving first in isolation increases vegetable intake among elementary schoolchildren. PLoS One 10(4):e0121283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reicks M, Redden JP, Mann T, Mykerezi E, Vickers Z (2012) Photographs in lunch tray compartments and vegetable consumption among children in elementary school cafeterias. JAMA 307(8):784–785.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberto CA, Larsen PD, Agnew H, Baik J, Brownell KD (2010) Evaluating the impact of menu labeling on food choices and intake. Amer. J. Public Health 100(2):312–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson E (2017) The science behind smarter lunchrooms. Peer J Preprints 5:e3137v3131.Google Scholar
• Robinson E, Nolan S, Tudur‐Smith C, Boyland EJ, Harrold JA, Hardman CA, Halford JC (2014) Will smaller plates lead to smaller waists? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the effect that experimental manipulation of dishware size has on energy consumption. Obesity Rev. 15(10):812–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M (2006) Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).Google Scholar
• Roy R, Kelly B, Rangan A, Allman-Farinelli M. (2015) Food environment interventions to improve the dietary behavior of young adults in tertiary education settings: A systematic literature review. J. Acad. Nutrition Dietetics 115(10):1647–1681.e1.Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Fischler C, Imada S, Sarubin A, Wrzesniewski A (1999) Attitudes to food and the role of food in life in the U.S.A., Japan, Flemish Belgium and France: Possible implications for the diet-health debate. Appetite 33(2):163–180.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Kabnick K, Pete E, Fischler C, Shields C (2003) The ecology of eating: Smaller portion sizes in France than in the United States help explain the French paradox. Psych. Sci. 14(5):450–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozin P, Scott S, Dingley M, Urbanek JK, Jiang H, Kaltenbach M (2011) Nudge to nobesity I: Minor changes in accessibility decrease food intake. Judgment Decision Making 6(4):323–332.Google Scholar
• Scheibehenne B, Todd PM, Wansink B (2010) Dining in the dark. The importance of visual cues for food consumption and satiety. Appetite 55(3):710–713.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Mochon D, Wyper L, Maroba J, Patel D, Ariely D (2014) Healthier by precommitment. Psych. Sci. 12(2):538–546.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz J, Riis J, Elbel B, Ariely D (2012) Inviting consumers to downsize fast-food portions significantly reduces calorie consumption. Health Affairs 31(2):399–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwartz MB (2007) The influence of a verbal prompt on school lunch fruit consumption: A pilot study. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 4(1):6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seymour JD, Lazarus Yaroch A, Serdula M, Blanck HM, Khan LK (2004) Impact of nutrition environmental interventions on point-of-purchase behavior in adults: A review. Preventive Medicine 39(2):108–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah AM, Bettman JR, Ubel PA, Keller PA, Edell JA (2014) Surcharges plus unhealthy labels reduce demand for unhealthy menu items. J. Marketing Res. 51(6):773–789.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shiv B, Fedorikhin A (1999) Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. 26(3):278–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinclair SE, Cooper M, Mansfield ED (2014) The influence of menu labeling on calories selected or consumed: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Acad. Nutrition Dietetice 114(9):1375–1388.e15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skov LR, Lourenco S, Hansen GL, Mikkelsen BE, Schofield C (2013) Choice architecture as a means to change eating behaviour in self‐service settings: A systematic review. Obesity Rev. 14(3):187–196.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sniehotta FF, Presseau J, Araújo-Soares V (2014) Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psych. Rev. 8(1):1–7.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snook KR, Hansen AR, Duke CH, Finch KC, Hackney AA, Zhang J (2017) Change in percentages of adults with overweight or obesity trying to lose weight, 1988–2014. JAMA 317(9):971–973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Vanhuele M, Pauwels K (2010) Mind-set metrics in market response models: An integrative approach. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):672–684.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steenhuis I, van Assema P, van Breukelen G, Glanz K, Kok G, de Vries H (2004) The impact of educational and environmental interventions in Dutch worksite cafeterias. Health Promotion Internat. 19(3):335–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2018a) “Better off, as judged by themselves”: A comment on evaluating nudges. Internat. Rev. Econom. 65(1):1–8.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sunstein CR (2018b) Misconceptions about nudges. J. Behav. Econom. Policy 2(1):61–67.Google Scholar
• Sutin AR, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB, Terracciano A (2011) Personality and obesity across the adult life span. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 101(3):579–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tal A, Wansink B (2015) An apple a day brings more apples your way: Healthy samples prime healthier choices. Psych. Marketing 32(5):575–584.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tandon PS, Zhou C, Chan NL, Lozano P, Couch SC, Glanz K, Krieger J, Saelens BE (2011) The impact of menu labeling on fast-food purchases for children and parents. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 41(4):434–438.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Penguin Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Thapaa JR, Lyford CP. (2014) Behavioral economics in the school lunchroom: Can it affect food supplier decisions? A systematic review. Internat. Food Agribusiness Management 17(A):187–208.Google Scholar
• Thomas JM, Ursell A, Robinson EL, Aveyard P, Jebb SA, Herman CP, Higgs S (2017) Using a descriptive social norm to increase vegetable selection in workplace restaurant settings. Health Psych. 36(11):1026–1033.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorndike AN, Riis J, Sonnenberg LM, Levy DE (2014) Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: Promoting healthy food choices. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 46(2):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorndike AN, Sonnenberg L, Riis J, Barraclough S, Levy DE (2012) A 2-phase labeling and choice architecture intervention to improve healthy food and beverage choices. Amer. J. Public Health 102(3):527–533.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turnwald BP, Boles DZ, Crum AJ (2017) Association between indulgent descriptions and vegetable consumption: Twisted carrots and dynamite beets. JAMA Internal Medicine 177(8):1216–1218.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanderlee L, Hammond D (2014) Does nutrition information on menus impact food choice? Comparisons across two hospital cafeterias. Public Health Nutrition 17(6):1393–1402.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Ittersum K, Wansink B (2012) Plate size and color suggestibility: The Delboeuf illusion’s bias on serving and eating behavior. J. Consumer Res. 39(2):215–228.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Ittersum K, Wansink B (2013) Extraverted children are more biased by bowl sizes than introverts. PLoS One 8(10):e78224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Kleef E, van der Broek O, van Trijp H (2015) Exploiting the spur of the moment to enhance healthy consumption: Verbal prompting to increase fruit choices in a self‐service restaurant. Appl. Psych. Health Well Being 7(2):149–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasiljevic M, Cartwright E, Pilling M, Lee M-M, Bignardi G, Pechey R, Hollands GJ, Jebb SA, Marteau TM (2018) Impact of calorie labelling in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial. Internat. J. Behav. Nutrition Physical Activity 15(1):41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Statist. Software 36(3):1–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wake M (2018) The failure of anti-obesity programmes in schools. BMJ. 360:k507.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh JW (1995) Flexibility in consumer purchasing for uncertain future tastes. Marketing Sci. 14(2):148–165.Link, Google Scholar
• Wansink B (2015) Change their choice! Changing behavior using the can approach and activism research. Psych. Marketing 32(5):486–500.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Chandon P (2006) Can ‘low-fat’ nutrition labels lead to obesity? J. Marketing Res. 43(4):605–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Chandon P (2014) Slim by design: Redirecting the accidental drivers of mindless overeating. J. Consumer Psych. 24(3):413–431.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Hanks AS (2013) Slim by design: Serving healthy foods first in buffet lines improves overall meal selection. PLoS One 8(10):e77055.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Kim J (2005) Bad popcorn in big buckets: Portion size can influence intake as much as taste. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 37(5):242–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Payne CR (2007) Counting bones: Environmental cues that decrease food intake. Perceptual Motor Skills 104(1):273–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, van Ittersum K (2013) Portion size me: Plate-size induced consumption norms and win-win solutions for reducing food intake and waste. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 19(4):320–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR (2012a) Can branding improve school lunches? Arch. Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 166(10):967–968. [Retraction, September 2017, JAMA Pediatrics 171(12):1230.]Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Payne C, Werle C (2008) Consequences of belonging to the “clean plate club.” Arch. Pediatric Adolescent Medicine 162(10):994–995. [Retraction, November 2018, JAMA Pediatrics 172(11):1017.]Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Payne CR, Chandon P (2007) Internal and external cues of meal cessation: The French paradox redux? Obesity 15(12):2920–2924.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, van Ittersum K, Painter JE (2006) Ice cream illusions: Bowls, spoons, and self-served portion sizes. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 31(3):240–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, van Ittersum K, Payne CR (2014) Larger bowl size increases the amount of cereal children request, consume, and waste. J Pediatrics 164(2):323–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Bhana H, Qureshi M, Cadenhead JW (2016) Using choice architecture to create healthy food interventions in food pantries. J. Nutrition Ed. Behav. 48(7):S35–S36.Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Just DR, Hanks AS, Smith LE (2013) Pre-sliced fruit in school cafeterias: Children’s selection and intake. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine 44(5):477–480.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wansink B, Just DR, Payne CR, Klinger MZ (2012b) Attractive names sustain increased vegetable intake in schools. Preventive Medicine 55(4):330–332. [Retraction, May 2018, Preventive Medicine 110:116.]Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb KL, Solomon LS, Sanders J, Akiyama C, Crawford PB (2011) Menu labeling responsive to consumer concerns and shows promise for changing patron purchases. J. Hunger Environ. Nutrition 6(2):166–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K (1998) Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Sci. 17(4):317–337.Link, Google Scholar
• Wilson AL, Buckley E, Buckley JD, Bogomolova S (2016) Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review. Food Quality Preference 51:47–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson NL, Just DR, Swigert J, Wansink B (2017) Food pantry selection solutions: A randomized controlled trial in client-choice food pantries to nudge clients to targeted foods. J. Public Health 39(2):366–372.Google Scholar
• Zlatevska N, Dubelaar C, Holden SS (2014) Sizing up the effect of portion size on consumption: A meta-analytic review. J. Marketing 78(3):140–154.Crossref, Google Scholar