Social TV, Advertising, and Sales: Are Social Shows Good for Advertisers?

References

• Babić Rosario A, Sotgiu F, Valck KD, Bijmolt THA (2016) The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benton A, Hill S (2012) The spoiler effect? Designing social TV content that promotes ongoing WOM. Presentation, Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST), October 14, Phoenix.Google Scholar
• Brasel AS, Gips J (2011) Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsych. Behav. Soc. Networking 14(9):527–534.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calder BJ, Malthouse EC, Schaedel U (2009) An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising dffectiveness. J. Interactive Marketing 23:321–331.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celsi RL, Olson JC (1988) The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. J. Consumer Res. 15(2):210–224.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlén M (2005) The medium as a contextual cue: Effects of creative media choice. J. Advertising 34(3):89–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ, Green BJ (1997) A comparison of media factors that influence the effectiveness of direct response television advertising. J. Direct Marketing 11(2):46–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisend M (2009) A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 37:191–203.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feltham TS, Arnold SJ (1994) Program involvement and ad/program consistency as moderators of program context effects. J. Consumer Psych. 3(1):51–77.Crossref, Google Scholar
• File T, Ryan C (2014) Computer and internet use in the United States: 2013. American Community Survey Reports, United States Census Bureau. Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/acs/acs-28.pdf.Google Scholar
• Flomenbaum A (2016) Exclusive: Nielsen study shows that TV advertising drives earned media for brands on Twitter. The Drum (February 21), http://www.thedrum.com/news/2016/02/21/exclusive-nielsen-study-shows-tv-advertising-drives-earned-media-brands-twitter.Google Scholar
• Fossen BL, Schweidel DA (2017) Television advertising and online word-of-mouth: An empirical investigation of social TV activity. Marketing Sci. 36(1):105–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Gelper S, Peres R, Eliashberg J (2018) Talk bursts: The role of spikes in pre-release word-of-mouth dynamics. J. Marketing Res. 55(6):801–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Hill S, Kim JY (2016) TV’S dirty little secret: The negative effect of popular TV on online auction sales. MIS Quart. 40(3):623–644.Crossref, Google Scholar
• IAB (2015) The changing TV experience: Attitudes and usage across multiple screens. Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.iab.com/insights/the-changing-tv-experience-attitudes-and-usage-across-multiple-screens/.Google Scholar
• Jeong S, Hwang Y (2012) Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. J. Communication 62(4):571–587.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson EJ, Moe WW, Fader PS, Bellman S, Lohse GL (2004) On the depth and dynamics of online search behavior. Marketing Sci. 50(3):299–308.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Cowgill B, Zhu Y (2014) Television advertising and online search. Management Sci. 60(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Katz H (2013) The Media Handbook: A Complete Guide to Advertising Media Selection, Planning, Research, and Buying (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Kazakova S, Cauberghe V, Hudders L, Labyt C (2016) The impact of media multitasking on the cognitive and attitudinal responses to television commercials: The moderating role of type of advertising appeal. J. Advertising 45(4):403–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kilger M, Romer E (2007) Do measures of media engagement correlate with product purchase likelihood? J. Advertising Res. 47(3):313–325.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley RH (2013) Down-to-the-minute effects of Super Bowl advertising on online search behavior. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 639–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Lord KR, Burnkrant RE (1993) Attention versus distraction: The interactive effect of program involvement and attentional devices on commercial processing. J. Advertising 22(1):47–60.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lynch J (2015) Why some low-rated TV shows keep getting renewed. Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.adweek.com/news/television/why-some-low-rated-tv-shows-keep-getting-renewed-164648.Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Moorman C, Jaworski BJ (1991) Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J. Marketing 55(4):32–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Rao AG, Weiss AM (2002) Assessing when increased media weight of real-world advertisements helps sales. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):391–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montgomery A, Li S, Srinivasan K, Liechty JC (2004) Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Sci. 23(4):579–595.Link, Google Scholar
• Murry JP Jr, Lastovicka JL, Singh SN (1992) Feeling and liking responses to television programs: An examination of two explanations for media-context effects. J. Consumer Res. 18(4):441–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2014) What’s empowering the new digital consumer? Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.nielsen.com/content/corporate/us/en/insights/news/2014/whats-empowering-the-new-digital-consumer.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2015a) Social TV: A bellwether for TV audience engagement. Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/social-tv-a-bellwether-for-tv-audience-engagement.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2015b) Live TV + social media = engaged viewers. Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/live-tv-social-media-engaged-viewers.html.Google Scholar
• Norris CE, Colman AM (1993) Context effects on memory for television advertisements. Soc. Behav. Personality 21(4):279–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olney TJ, Holbrook MB, Batra R (1991) Consumer responses to advertising: The effects of ad content, emotions, and attitude toward the ad on viewing time. J. Consumer Res. 17(4):440–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavelchak MA, Antil JH, Munch JM (1988) The Super Bowl: An investigation into the relationship among program context, emotional experience, and ad recall. J. Consumer Res. 15(3):360–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell M (2012) Social TV keeps viewers engaged when minds might wander, study says. AdAge (July 3), http://adage.com/article/media/social-tv-viewers-engaged/235739/.Google Scholar
• Schreiner T (2013) Amplifiers study: The Twitter users who are most likely to retweet and how to engage them. Accessed August 9, 2016, https://blog.twitter.com/2013/amplifiers-study-the-twitter-users-who-are-most-likely-to-retweet-and-how-to-engage-them.Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Moe WW (2016) Binge watching and advertising. J. Marketing 80(5):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Foutz NZ, Tanner RJ (2014) Synergy or interference: The effect of product placement on commercial break audience decline. Marketing Sci. 33(6):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Seiler S, Yao S, Wang W (2017) Does online word-of-mouth increase demand? (and how?) Evidence from a natural experiment. Marketing Sci. 36(6):838–861.Link, Google Scholar
• Singh SN, Hitchon JC (1989) The intensifying effects of exciting television programs on the reception of subsequent commercials. Psych. Marketing 6(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sternthal B, Craig CS (1973) Humor in advertising. J. Marketing 37(4):12–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart DW, Furse DH (1986) Effective Television Advertising: A Study of 1000 Commercials (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA).Google Scholar
• Tavassoli NT, Shultz CJ II, Fitzsimons GJ (1995) Program involvement: Are moderate levels best for ad memory and attitude toward the ad? J. Advertising Res. 35(5):61–72.Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Picard R, el Kaliouby R (2014) Why, when, and how much to entertain consumers in advertisements? A web-based facial tracking field study. Marketing Sci. 33(6):809–827.Link, Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Wedel M, Pieters R (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau (2013) America’s families and living arrangements: 2013: Households. Accessed August 9, 2016, http://www.census.gov/hhes/families/data/cps2013H.html.Google Scholar
• Wang J, Calder BJ (2009) Media engagement and advertising: Transportation, matching, transference, and intrusion. J. Consumer Psych. 19(3):546–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kempe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Woltman Elpers JLCM, Wedel M, Pieters RGM (2003) Why do consumers stop viewing television commercials? Two experiments on the influence of moment-to-moment entertainment and information value. J. Marketing Res. 40(4):437–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xiong G, Bharadwaj S (2014) Prerelease buzz evolution patterns and new product performance. Marketing Sci. 33(3):401–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoo C, MacInnis D (2005) The brand attitude formation process of emotional and informational ads. J. Bus. Res. 58:1397–1406.Crossref, Google Scholar
• You Y, Vadakkepatt GG, Joshi AM (2015) A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. J. Marketing 79(2):19–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Trusov M, Stephen AT, Jamal Z (2017) Online shopping and social media: Friends or foes? J. Marketing 81(6):24–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zillmann D, Williams BR, Bryant J, Boynton KR, Wolf MA (1980) Acquisition of information from educational television as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. J. Ed. Psych. 72(2):170–180.Crossref, Google Scholar