Measuring the Impact of Product Placement with Brand-Related Social Media Conversations and Website Traffic

References

• Balasubramanian SK, Karrh JA, Patwardhan H (2006) Audience response to product placements: An integrative framework and future research agenda. J. Advertising 35(3):115–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boerman SC, van Reijmersdal EA, Neijens PC (2015) Using eye tracking to understand the effects of brand placement disclosure types in television programs. J. Advertising 44(3):196–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bressoud E, Lehu J, Russell CA (2010) The product well placed: The relative impact of placement and audience characteristics on placement recall. J. Advertising Res. 50(4):374–385.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowley E, Barron C (2008) When product placement goes wrong: The effects of program liking and placement prominence. J. Advertising 37(1):89–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davtyan D, Stewart K, Cunningham I (2016) Comparing brand placements and advertisements on brand recall and recognition. J. Advertising Res. 56(3):299–310.Crossref, Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2016) US ad blocking to jump by double digits this year. eMarketer (June 21), https://www.emarketer.com/Article/US-Ad-Blocking-Jump-by-Double-Digits-This-Year/1014111.Google Scholar
• Fossen BL, Schweidel DA (2017) Television advertising and online word-of-mouth: An empirical investigation of social TV activity. Marketing Sci. 36(1):105–123.Link, Google Scholar
• Friestad M, Wright P (1994) The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. J. Consumer Res. 21(1):1–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Goldfarb ASP, Han SP (2013) How is the mobile internet different? Search costs and local activities. Inform. Systems Res. 24(3):613–631.Link, Google Scholar
• Gianatasio D (2014) RuPaul dresses up product placement: Reality shows like Drag Race, Top Chef, Project Runway cast brands in a starring role. Adweek (August 10), http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/rupaul-dresses-product-placement-159385.Google Scholar
• Google (2012) The new multi-screen world: Understanding cross-platform consumer behavior. Think with Google (August), https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/advertising-channels/mobile/the-new-multi-screen-world-study/.Google Scholar
• Gupta PB, Lord KR (1998) Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. J. Current Issues Res. Advertising 20(1):47–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU (2011) Seeding strategies for viral marketing: An empirical comparison. J. Marketing 75(November):55–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Homer PM (2009) Product placements. J. Advertising 38(3):21–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Cowgill B, Zhu Y (2014) Television advertising and online search. Management Sci. 60(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Karniouchina EV, Uslay C, Erenburg G (2011) Do marketing media have life cycles? The case of product placement in movies. J. Marketing 75(3):27–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz HE (2013) The Media Handbook: A Complete Guide to Advertising Media Selection, Planning, Research, and Buying (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
• Law S, Braun KA (2000) I’ll have what she’s having: Gauging the impact of product placements on viewers. Psych. Marketing 17(12):1059–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Nguyen D (2015) Display advertising’s competitive spillovers to consumer search. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(2):93–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2013) Down-to-the-minute effects of Super Bowl advertising on online search behavior. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 639–656.Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Lovett M, Peres R, Shachar R (2014) A data set of brands and their characteristics. Marketing Sci. 33(4):609–617.Link, Google Scholar
• Mandese J (2018) Product placement poised to top $10 billion: Report cites fewer, more valuable deals including upfronts, Netflix. MediaPost (June 13), https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/320675/productplacement-poised-to-top-10-billion-repor.html.Google Scholar
• Melumad S, Inman JJ, Pham MT (2019) Emotional gist: How smartphone use changes user-generated content. J. Marketing Res. 56(2):259–275.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2015) New America. New consumers. Nielsen (July 21), http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/new-america-new-consumers.html.Google Scholar
• Nielsen (2016) The Nielsen total audience report: Q3 2016. Report, Nielsen, New York.Google Scholar
• O’Guinn TC, Shrum LJ (1997) The role of television in the construction of consumer reality. J. Consumer Res. 23(4):278–294.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paivio A (1971) Imagery and Verbal Processes (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York).Google Scholar
• Posner MI, Nissen MJ, Klein R (1976) Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance. Psych. Rev. 83(2):157–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Risselada H, Verhoef PC, Bijmolt THA (2014) Dynamic effects of social influence and direct marketing on the adoption of high-technology products. J. Marketing 78(March):52–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell CA (2002) Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. J. Consumer Res. 29(3):306–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell CA, Belch M (2005) A managerial investigation into the product placement industry. J. Advertising Res. 45(1):73–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell CA, Russell D, Morales A, Lehu J (2017) Hedonic contamination of entertainment: How exposure to advertising in movies and television taints subsequent entertainment experiences. J. Advertising Res. 57(1):38–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schreiner T (2013) Amplifiers study: The Twitter users who are most likely to retweet and how to engage them. Twitter (blog) (January 10), https://blog.twitter.com/2013/amplifiers-study-the-twitter-users-who-are-most-likely-to-retweet-and-how-to-engage-them.Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Moe WW (2016) Binge watching and advertising. J. Marketing 80(5):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Foutz NZ, Tanner RJ (2014) Synergy or interference: The effect of product placement on commercial break audience decline. Marketing Sci. 33(6):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
• Thomson M (2006) Human brands: Investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities. J. Marketing 70(3):104–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toubia O, Stephen AT (2013) Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to Twitter? Marketing Sci. 32(3):368–392.Link, Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal E, Neijens P, Smit EG (2009) A new branch of advertising: Reviewing factors that influence reactions to product placement. J. Advertising Res. 49(4):429–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verhellen Y, Dens N, De Pelsmacker P (2016) Do I know you? How brand familiarity and perceived fit affect consumers’ attitudes towards brands placed in movies. Marketing Lett. 27(3):461–471.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vranica S (2016) Advertisers try new tactics to break through to consumers. Wall Street Journal (June 19), http://www.wsj.com/articles/advertisers-try-new-tactics-to-break-through-to-consumers-1466328601.Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) How the digital video recorder (DVR) changes traditional television advertising. J. Advertising 37(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kempe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Wiles MA, Danielova A (2009) The worth of product placement in successful films: An event study analysis. J. Marketing 73(4):44–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu K, Chan J, Ghose A, Han SP (2017) Battle of the channels: The impact of tablets on digital commerce. Management Sci. 63(5):1469–1492.Link, Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Choi YK, Song S (2011) When intrusive can be likable. J. Advertising 40(2):63–76.Crossref, Google Scholar