Critical Condition: People Don’t Dislike a Corporate Experiment More Than They Dislike Its Worst Condition
Published Online:23 Dec 2019https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2019.1166
References
- (2014) Furor erupts over Facebook’s experiment on users. Wall Street Journal (July 1), https://www.wsj.com/articles/furor-erupts-over-facebook-experiment-on-users-1404085840.Google Scholar
- (2006) The personalization privacy paradox: An empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 30(1):13–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness. J. Consumer Res. 29(4):474–491.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing Res. 36(2):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1):104–115.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) Psychology and economics: Evidence from the field. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):315–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1999) Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. J. Consumer Psych. 8(3):243–259.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Companies like Amazon need to run more tests on workplace practices. Harvard Bus. Rev. (August 20), https://hbr.org/2015/08/companies-like-amazon-need-to-run-more-tests-on-workplace-practices.Google Scholar
- (2014) Facebook tinkers with users’ emotions in news feed experiment, stirring outcry. New York Times (June 29), https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/30/technology/facebook-tinkers-with-users-emotions-in-news-feed-experiment-stirring-outcry.html.Google Scholar
- (2014) Facebook and Silicon Valley treat you like a laboratory rat. Accessed February 19, 2019, https://money.cnn.com/2014/06/30/technology/social/facebook-experiment/index.html.Google Scholar
- (2014) OkCupid’s human experiments are way creepier than Facebook’s. Accessed February 19, 2019, https://www.fastcompany.com/3033645/okcupids-human-experiments-are-way-creepier-than-facebooks.Google Scholar
- (2006) Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. J. Consumer Res. 33(3):304–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) OkCupid lied to users about their compatibility as an experiment. Forbes (July 28), https://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2014/07/28/okcupid-experiment-compatibility-deception/.Google Scholar
- (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(24):8788–8790.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Were OkCupid’s and Facebook’s experiments unethical? Harvard Bus. Rev. (July 29), https://hbr.org/2014/07/were-okcupids-and-facebooks-experiments-unethical.Google Scholar
- (2015) Two cheers for corporate experimentation: The A/B illusion and the virtues of data-driven innovation. Colorado Tech. Law J. 13(2):273–331.Google Scholar
- (2014) Everything we know about Facebook’s secret mood manipulation experiment. The Atlantic (June 28), https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/everything-we-know-about-facebooks-secret-mood-manipulation-experiment/373648/.Google Scholar
- (2014) Learning about new technologies through social networks: Experimental evidence on nontraditional stoves in Bangladesh. Marketing Sci. 34(4):480–499.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Online privacy and the disclosure of cookie use: Effects on consumer trust and anticipated patronage. J. Public Policy Marketing 27(1):19–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Can marketing campaigns induce multichannel buying and more profitable customers? A field experiment. Marketing Sci. 35(2):201–217.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) The Facebook experiment: What it means for you. Accessed February 18, 2019, https://www.forbes.com/sites/dailymuse/2014/08/04/the-facebook-experiment-what-it-means-for-you/.Google Scholar
- (2009) Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 45(4):867–872.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. 5(4):296–320.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) We experiment on human beings! Accessed January 20, 2019, https://web.archive.org/web/20170316051630/https://theblog.okcupid.com/we-experiment-on-human-beings-5dd9fe280cd5.Google Scholar
- (2014) Research at Facebook | Facebook newsroom. Accessed February 19, 2019, https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/10/research-at-facebook/.Google Scholar
- (1989) Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psych. Bull. 105(1):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Ethics and target marketing: The role of product harm and consumer vulnerability. J. Marketing 61(3):1–20.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Facebook isn’t the only website running experiments on human beings. Accessed February 19, 2019, http://time.com/3047603/okcupid-oktrends-experiments/.Google Scholar
- (2016) Do sympathy biases induce charitable giving? The effects of advertising content. Marketing Sci. 35(6):849–869.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Enduring effects of goal achievement and failure within customer loyalty programs: A large-scale field experiment. Marketing Sci. 35(4):565–575.Link, Google Scholar
- (1999) Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 25(9):1115–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Run field experiments to make sense of your big data. Harvard Bus. Rev. (November 12), https://hbr.org/2015/11/run-field-experiments-to-make-sense-of-your-big-data.Google Scholar
