A Flexible Demand Model for Complements Using Household Production Theory

References

• Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. (London) 75(299):493–517.Google Scholar
• Blundell R, Robin J (2000) Latent separability: Grouping goods without weak separability. Econometrica 68(1):53–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan TY (2006) Estimating a continuous hedonic-choice model with an application to demand for soft drinks. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):466–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Nair HS (2011) Discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(6):977–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P (2004) Multiple discreteness and product differentiation: Demand for carbonated soft drinks. Marketing Sci. 23(1):66–81.Link, Google Scholar
• Gentzkow M (2007) Valuing new goods in a model with complementarity: Online newspapers. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):713–744.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J, Allenby GM, Rossi PE (2002) Modeling consumer demand for variety. Marketing Sci. 21(3):229–250.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Telang R, Vogt WB, Krishnan R (2010) An empirical analysis of mobile voice service and SMS: A structural model. Management Sci. 56(2):234–252.Link, Google Scholar
• Koenigsberg O, Kohli R, Montoya R (2010) Package size decisions. Management Sci. 56(3):485–494.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Allenby GM (2014) Modeling indivisible demand. Marketing Sci. 33(3):364–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim J, Allenby GM (2013) A direct utility model for asymmetric complements. Marketing Sci. 32(3):454–470.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chintagunta PK, Zhu T (2010) Complementarities and the demand for home broadband internet services. Marketing Sci. 29(4):701–720.Link, Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Ansari A, Gupta S (1999) The “shopping basket”: A model for multicategory purchase incidence decisions. Marketing Sci. 18(2):95–114.Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N (2007) Investigating consumers’ purchase incidence and brand choice decisions across multiple product categories: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 26(2):196–217.Link, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Ma Y (2012) A multicategory model of consumers’ purchase incidence, quantity, and brand choice decisions: Methodological issues and implications on promotional decisions. J. Marketing Res. 49(4):435–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muth RF (1966) Household production and consumer demand functions. Econometrica 34(3):699–708.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niraj R, Padmanabhan V, Seetharaman PB (2008) A cross-category model of households’ incidence and quantity decisions. Marketing Sci. 27(2):225–235.Link, Google Scholar
• Rossi PE, McCulloch RE, Allenby GM (1996) The value of purchase history data in target marketing. Marketing Sci. 15(4):321–340.Link, Google Scholar
• Rubin DB, Gelman A (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statist. Sci. 7(4):457–511.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satomura T, Kim J, Allenby GM (2011) Multiple-constraint choice models with corner and interior solutions. Marketing Sci. 30(3):481–490.Link, Google Scholar
• Song I, Chintagunta PK (2007) A discrete-continuous model for multicategory purchase behavior of households. J. Marketing Res. 44(4):595–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun B (2005) Promotion effect on endogenous consumption. Marketing Sci. 24(3):430–443.Link, Google Scholar
• Tanner MA, Wong WH (1987) The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. American Statist. Assoc. 82(398):528–540.Crossref, Google Scholar