Competitive Imperfect Price Discrimination and Market Power
Published Online:6 Jul 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1234
References
- (2016) The economics of privacy. J. Econom. Literature 54(2):442–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Monopoly price discrimination and privacy: The hidden cost of hiding. Econom. Lett. 149:141–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) How retailers can drive profitable growth through dynamic pricing. Accessed April 11, 2018, http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/how-retailers-can-drive-profitable-growth-through-dynamic-pricing.Google Scholar
- (2017) Big data and competition policy: Market power, personalised pricing and advertising. Report, Centre on Regulation in Europe, Brussels.Google Scholar
- (2016) Selling customer information to competing firms. Econom. Lett. 149:10–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) President Trump delivers final blow to web browsing privacy rules. Ars Technica (April 4), https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/04/trumps-signature-makes-it-official-isp-privacy-rules-are-dead/.Google Scholar
- (1983) Equilibrium price dispersion. Econometrica 51(4):955–969.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Business Wire (2015) Ant financial unveils China’s first credit-scoring system using online data. Business Wire (January 27), http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150127006582/en/Ant-Financial-Unveils-China\U{2019}s-Credit-Scoring-System-Online.Google Scholar
- (2006) On the optimality of privacy in sequential contracting. J. Econom. Theory 130(1):168–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Strategic price complexity in retail financial markets. J. Financial Econom. 91(3):278–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2002) Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. 21(2):197–208.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Pricing with cookies: Behavior-based price discrimination and spatial competition. Management Sci. 64(12):5669–5687.Link, Google Scholar
- (1998) Third-degree price discrimination in oligopoly: All-out competition and strategic commitment. RAND J. Econom. 29(2):306–323.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) The economics of ownership, access and trade in digital data. JRC Digital Economy Working Paper 2017-01, Joint Research Centre, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
- (2007) First-degree discrimination by a duopoly: Pricing and quality choice. B.E. J. Theoret. Econom. 7(1):1–21.Google Scholar
- European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (2019) Big data analytics in motor and health insurance: A thematic review. Accessed December 6, 2019, https://register.eiopa.europa.eu/Publications/EIOPA_BigDataAnalytics_ThematicReview_April2019.pdf.Google Scholar
- Executive Office of the President of the United States (2015) Big data and differential pricing. Accessed July 23, 2017, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/docs/Big_Data_Report_Nonembargo_v2.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2013) The effects of mailing design characteristics on direct mail campaign performance. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 30(2):143–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Price competition under universal service obligations. Internat. J. Econom. Theory 6(3):311–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1993) The provision of information in a Bertrand oligopoly. J. Indust. Econom. 41(1):61–76.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) The targeting of advertising. Marketing Sci. 24(3):461–476.Link, Google Scholar
- (2002) Bertrand competition under uncertainty. J. Indust. Econom. 50(1):11–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Targeted pricing and customer data sharing among rivals. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 31(2):131–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Dynamic competition in the era of big data. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- (2019) The impact of access to consumer data on the competitive effects of horizontal mergers and exclusive dealing. J. Econom. Management Strategy 28(3):373–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2004) Quality of information and oligopolistic price discrimination. J. Econom. Management Strategy 13(4):671–702.Crossref, Google Scholar
- McKinsey & Company (2016) The age of analytics: Competing in a data-driven world. Accessed May 14, 2018, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/the-age-of-analytics-competing-in-a-data-driven-world.Google Scholar
- (2012) Detecting price and search discrimination on the internet. Proc. 11th ACM Workshop Hot Topics Networks (ACM, New York), 79–84.Google Scholar
- (2019) The value of personal information in online markets with endogenous privacy. Management Sci. 65(3):1342–1362.Link, Google Scholar
- (2013) The costs of lost privacy: Consumer harm and rising economic inequality in the age of Google. William Mitchell Law Rev. 40(2):849–889.Google Scholar
- (2019) US hospitals are now required by law to post prices online. Good luck finding them. Quartz (January 15), https://qz.com/1518545/price-lists-for-the-115-biggest-us-hospitals-new-transparency-law/.Google Scholar
- (2005) Web sites change prices based on customers’ habits. CNN (June 24), http://edition.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/24/ramasastry.website.prices/.Google Scholar
- (2017) Access barriers to big data. Arizona Law Rev. 59(339):340–382.Google Scholar
- (2002) Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. 48(9):1143–1160.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) First-degree price discrimination using big data. Working Paper 58, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
- (1995) Bertrand competition when rivals’ costs are unknown. J. Indust. Econom. 43(1):1–11.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Consumer privacy in oligopolistic markets: Winners, losers, and welfare. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 34:80–84.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1988) On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):122–137.Google Scholar
- (2020) Consumer production with data requirements: Structure and policy implications. Production Oper. Management 29(2):309–329.Google Scholar
- (1980) A model of sales. Amer. Econom. Rev. 70(4):651–659.Google Scholar
- (1999) Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) What’s in a “name”? Impact of use of customer information in email advertisements. Inform. Systems Res. 23(3):679–697.Link, Google Scholar

