A Model of Brand Architecture Choice: A House of Brands vs. A Branded House

References

• Aaker DA, Keller KL (1990) Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. J. Marketing 54(1):27–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andersson F (2002) Pooling reputations. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 20(5):715–730.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boush DM, Loken B (1991) A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation. J. Marketing Res. 28(1):16–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral LM (2000) Stretching firm and brand reputation. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):658–673.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral LM (2009) Umbrella branding with imperfect observability and moral hazard. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 27(2):206–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choi JP (1998) Brand extension as informational leverage. Rev. Econom. Stud. 65(4):655–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdem T, Sun B (2002) An empirical investigation of spillover effects of marketing mix strategy in umbrella branding. J. Marketing Res. 39(4):408–420.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):634–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hakenes H, Peitz M (2008) Umbrella branding and the provision of quality. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 26(2):546–556.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hörner J (2002) Reputation and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(3):644–663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein B, Leffler KB (1981) The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. 89(4):615–641.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps DM, Wilson R (1982) Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory 27(2):253–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Skrzypacz A (2014) Limited records and reputation bubbles. J. Econom. Theory 151(May):2–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mailath GJ, Samuelson L (2001) Who wants a good reputation? Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(2):415–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the internet. Marketing Sci. 25(2):155–163.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Shin J (2011) Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Marketing Sci. 30(4):666–685.Link, Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal J (2012) Linking reputations through umbrella branding. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(3):335–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miklós-Thal J, Raith M, Selove M (2018) What are we really good at? Product strategy with uncertain capabilities. Marketing Sci. 37(2):294–309.Link, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1982) Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence. J. Econom. Theory 27(2):280–312.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S (2012) Can brand extension signal product quality? Marketing Sci. 31(5):756–770.Link, Google Scholar
• Neeman Z, Öry A, Yu J (2019) The benefit of collective reputation. RAND J. Econom. 50(4):787–821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park CW, Milberg S, Lawson R (1991) Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. J. Consumer Res. 18(2):185–193.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sappington DE, Wernerfelt B (1985) To brand or not to brand? A theoretical and empirical question. J. Bus. 58(3):279–293.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C (1983) Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. 98(4):659–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin J, Sudhir K (2010) A customer management dilemma: When is it profitable to reward one’s own customers? Marketing Sci. 29(4):671–689.Link, Google Scholar
• Smith DC (1992) Brand extensions and advertising efficiency: What can and cannot be expected. J. Advertising. Res. 32(6):11–20.Google Scholar
• Smith DC, Park CW (1992) The effects of brand extensions on market share and advertising efficiency. J. Marketing Res. 29(3):296–313.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tauber EM (1981) Brand franchise extension: new product benefits from existing brand names. Bus. Horizons 24(2):36–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (1999) Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B (1988) Umbrella branding as a signal of new product quality: An example of signalling by posting a bond. RAND J. Econom. 19(3):458–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolinsky A (1986) True monopolistic competition as a result of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):493–511.Crossref, Google Scholar