The Path to Click: Are You on It?

References

• Amaldoss W, Jerath K, Sayedi A (2016) Keyword management costs and “broad match” in sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 35(2):259–274.Link, Google Scholar
• Animesh A, Viswanathan S, Agarwal R (2011) Competing creatively in sponsored search markets: The effect of rank, differentiation strategy, and competition on performance. J. Inform. Systems Res. 22(1):153–169.Link, Google Scholar
• Berman R, Katona Z (2013) The role of search engine optimization in search marketing. Marketing Sci. 32(4):644–651.Link, Google Scholar
• Bettman JR, Kakkar P (1977) Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. J. Consumer Res. 3(4):233–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braun J, Julesz B (1998) Withdrawing attention at little or no cost: Detection and discrimination tasks. Perception Psychophys. 60(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broder A (2002) A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36(2):3–10.Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Kim JB, Mela CF (2016) Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online? Marketing Sci. 35(5):693–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Buscher G, Dumais ST, Cutrell E (2010) The good the bad and the random: an eye-tracking study of ad quality in web search. Proc. 33rd Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (ACM, New York), 42–49.Google Scholar
• Chandon P, Hutchinson JW, Bradlow ET, Young SH (2009) Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase. J. Marketing 73(6):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen M, Anderson JR, Sohn M (2001) What can a mouse cursor tell us more?: Correlation of eye/mouse movements on web browsing. CHI'01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM, New York), 281–282.Google Scholar
• Choi WJ, Sayedi A (2019) Learning in online advertising. Marketing Sci. 38(4):584–608.Link, Google Scholar
• Dumais ST, Buscher G, Cutrell E (2010) Individual differences in gaze patterns for web search. Proc. 3rd Sympos. Inform. Interaction Context (ACM, New York), 185–194.Google Scholar
• Ebbes P, Papies D, van Heerde HJ (2016) Dealing with endogeneity: A nontechnical guide for marketing researchers. Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A, eds. Handbook of Market Research (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 1–37.Google Scholar
• Edelman B, Lai Z (2016) Design of search engine services: Channel interdependence in search engine results. J. Marketing Res. 53(6):881–900.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A, Yang S (2009) An empirical analysis of search engine advertising: Sponsored search in electronic markets. Marketing Sci. 55(10):1605–1622.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Guan Z, Cutrell E (2007) An eye tracking study of the effect of target rank on web search. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (ACM, New York), 417–420.Google Scholar
• Itti L, Koch C (2000) A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Res. 40(10-12):1489–1506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jansen BJ, Booth DL, Spink A (2008) Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries. Inform. Processing Management 44(3):1251–1266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jerath K, Ma L, Park YH, Srinivasan K (2011) A “position paradox” in sponsored search auctions. Marketing Sci. 30(4):612–627.Link, Google Scholar
• Katona Z, Sarvary M (2010) The race for sponsored links: Bidding patterns for search advertising. Marketing Sci. 29(2):199–215.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu J, Toubia O (2018) A semantic approach for estimating consumer content preferences from online search queries. Marketing Sci. 37(6):930–952.Link, Google Scholar
• Lorigo L, Pan B, Hembrooke H, Joachims T, Granka L, Gay G (2006) The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Inform. Processing Management 42(4):1123–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lu S, Yang S (2017) Investigating the spillover effect of keyword market entry in sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 36(6):976–998.Link, Google Scholar
• Meißner M, Musalem A, Huber J (2016) Eye tracking reveals processes that enable conjoint choices to become increasingly efficient with practice. J. Marketing Res. 53(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller GA (1995) WordNet: A lexical database for English. Comm. ACM 38(11):39–41.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakayama K, Mackeben M (1989) Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Res. 29(11):1631–1647.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW (1976) Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 16(2):366–387.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Johnson EJ (1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petrin A, Train K (2010) A control function approach to endogeneity in consumer choice models. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):3–13.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Wedel M, Zhang J (2007) Optimal feature advertising design under competitive clutter. Management Sci. 53(11):1815–1828.Link, Google Scholar
• Pirolli P, Card S (1999) Information foraging. Psych. Rev. 106(4):643–675.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psych. Bull. 124(3):372–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell CP (1921) How to write a sales-making letter. Printers’ Ink 115(1):49–56.Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE (2011) From generic to branded: A model of spillover in paid search advertising. J. Marketing Res. 48(1):87–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rutz OJ, Bucklin RE, Trusov M, Bucklin RE (2011) Modeling indirect effects of paid search advertising: Which keywords lead to more future visits? Marketing Sci. 30(4):646–665.Link, Google Scholar
• Skiera B, Abou Nabout N (2013) PROSAD: A bidding decision support system for profit optimizing search engine advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(2):213–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Sherman C (2005) A new F-word for Google search results. Accessed January 10, 2020, https://www.searchenginewatch.com/2005/03/08/a-new-f-word-for-google-search-results/.Google Scholar
• Stüttgen P, Boatwright P, Monroe RT (2012) A satisficing choice model. Marketing Sci. 31(6):878–899.Link, Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS (2014) Mind the attention gap: What brands need to know about advertising today. Retrieved October 2, 2019, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/mind-the-attention-gap-what-brands-need-to-know-about-advertising-today.Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Wedel M, Pieters R (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
• Ursu RM (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.Link, Google Scholar
• van der Lans R, Pieters FGM, Wedel M (2008) Eye-movement analysis of search effectiveness. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(482):452–461.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolfe JM (1998) What can 1 million trials tell us about visual search? Psych. Sci. 9(1):33–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang L, Toubia O, De Jong MG (2015) A bounded rationality model of information search and choice in preference measurement. J. Marketing Res. 52(2):166–183.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao S, Mela CF (2011) A dynamic model of sponsored search advertising. Marketing Sci. 30(3):447–468.Link, Google Scholar
• Zia M, Rao RC (2019) Search advertising: Budget allocation across search engines. Marketing Sci. 38(6):1023–1037.Abstract, Google Scholar