Impact of Political Television Advertisements on Viewers’ Response to Subsequent Advertisements
Published Online:27 Oct 2020https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2020.1260
References
- (2018) The ratings bump of Donald Trump. Forbes (April 18), https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradadgate/2018/04/18/the-ratings-bump-of-donald-trump/.Google Scholar
- (2001) The moderating role of commitment on the spillover effect of marketing communications. J. Marketing Res. 38(4):458–470.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Activism in the social media age. Pew Research Center (July 11), http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/07/11/activism-in-the-social-media-age/.Google Scholar
- (2016) The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. J. Marketing Res. 53(3):297–318.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1997) Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements: The integration of moment-to-moment responses into overall judgments. J. Marketing Res. 34(2):219–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. Amer. J. Political Sci. 49(2):388–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
- Comscore TV Essentials (2020) Average audience, June 2016-November 2016, US. Accessed December 1, 2016, www.comscore.com.Google Scholar
- (2005) The medium as a contextual cue: Effects of creative media choice. J. Advertising 34(3):89–98.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? J. Advertising Res. 35(1):37–47.Google Scholar
- (1997) A comparison of media factors that influence the effectiveness of direct response television advertising. J. Direct Marketing 11(2):46–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) TV viewing and advertising targeting. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Immediate responses of online brand search and price search to TV ads. J Marketing. 83(4):81–100.Google Scholar
- (2016) The political environment on social media. Pew Research Center (October 25), http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/10/25/the-political-environment-on-social-media/.Google Scholar
- eMarketer (2018a) As midterm elections heat up, ad spending rises. eMarketer (September 25), https://www.emarketer.com/content/as-mid-terms-heat-up-ad-spending-rises.Google Scholar
- eMarketer (2018b) US programmatic TV ad spending, 2016-2020. eMarketer (July 18), https://www.emarketer.com/chart/223921/us-programmatic-tv-ad-spending-2016-2020-billions-change-of-tv-ad-spending.Google Scholar
- (2016) Programmatic TV 101: The multi-billion-dollar ad tech that’s transforming television. ” Recode (April 26), https://www.vox.com/2016/4/26/11586412/programmatic-tv-101-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-multi-billion.Google Scholar
- (2017) Television advertising and online word-of-mouth: An empirical investigation of social tv activity. Marketing Sci. 36(1):105–123.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019a) Measuring the impact of product placement with brand-related social media conversations and website traffic. Marketing Sci. 38(3):365–541.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019b) Social TV, advertising, and sales: Are social shows good for advertisers? Marketing Sci. 38(2):274–295.Link, Google Scholar
- (2007) The mass media and the public’s assessments of presidential candidates, 1952–2000. J. Politics 69(4):1160–1175.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Advertising effects in presidential elections. Marketing Sci. 32(1):19–35.Link, Google Scholar
- . (2012) Marketing and politics: Models, behavior, and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 23(2):391–403.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) TV audience measurement with data. Big Data 2(2):76–86.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Unregulated political advertising erodes trust in all advertising. MarketingWeek (September 3), https://www.marketingweek.com/tanya-joseph-political-ads-erode-trust/.Google Scholar
- (2017) Blue and red voices: Effects of political ideology on consumers’ complaining and disputing behavior. J. Consumer Res. 44(3):477–499.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1991) Television commercial evaluation in the context of program induced mood: Congruency versus consistency effects. J. Advertising 20(2):1–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The Media Handbook: A Complete Guide to Advertising Media Selection, Planning, Research, and Buying (Routledge, New York).Google Scholar
- (2018) We are living through a golden age of protest. The Guardian (May 6), https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/06/protest-trump-direct-action-activism.Google Scholar
- (2017) Data-driven targeting creates huge 2016 political ad shift: Broadcast TV down 20%, cable and digital way up. Adage (January 3), https://adage.com/article/media/2016-political-broadcast-tv-spend-20-cable-52/307346/.Google Scholar
- (2013) Getting liberals and conservatives to go green: Political ideology and congruent appeals. J. Consumer Res. 40(2):350–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Negativity in the evaluation of political candidates. J. Marketing 69(1):131–142.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta‐analytic reassessment. J. Politics 69(4):1176–1209.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
- (2014) A data set of brands and their characteristics. Marketing Sci. 33(4):609–617.Link, Google Scholar
- McClellan (2016) Political ads found to suppress effectiveness of brand advertising. MediaPost (October 25), https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/287639/political-ads-found-to-suppress-effectiveness-of-b.html.Google Scholar
- (2019) Watching people watch TV. Working paper, University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
- (1997) Affective contrast and assimilation in counterfactual thinking. J. Experiment. Sociol. Psych. 33(1):77–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1984) Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. J. Advertising 13(3):27–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2015) Report: TV ad spending in 2016 election to reach $4.4 billion. CBS News (July 25), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-tv-ad-spending-in-2016-election-to-reach-4-4-billion/.Google Scholar
- (2014) Political polarization & media habits. Pew Research Center (October 21), http://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/.Google Scholar
- (2018) Ad group announces rules for transparency in political advertising. Wall Street Journal (May 22), https://www.wsj.com/articles/ad-group-announces-rules-for-transparency-in-political-advertising-1526983200.Google Scholar
- (1992) Feeling and liking responses to television programs: An examination of two explanations for media-context effects. J. Consumer Res. 18(4):441–451.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Better or different? How political ideology shapes preferences for differentiation in the social hierarchy. J. Consumer Res. 45(2):227–250.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Cable news ratings: MSNBC, CNN, Fox News post double-digit growth in Q2. Accessed February 1, 2019, https://variety.com/2017/tv/news/cable-news-ratings-cnn-fox-news-msnbc-q2-1202479416/.Google Scholar
- (2017) 2018 campaign ad spend will be in the billions. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://cookpolitical.com/analysis/national/political-advertising/2018-campaign-ad-spend-will-be-billions.Google Scholar
- (2019) Agency ad buyers say there isn’t enough addressable TV inventory. Accessed October 1, 2019, https://digiday.com/future-of-tv/agency-ad-buyers-say-isnt-enough-addressable-tv-inventory/.Google Scholar
- (1997) Consumer memory for television advertising: A field study of duration, serial position, and competition effects. J. Consumer Res. 23(March):362–372.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Confirmation and the effects of valenced political advertising: A field experiment. J. Consumer Res. 34(6):794–806.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2020) Fox isolates Trump and Bloomberg super bowl ads: Sources. Accessed January 19, 2020, https://adage.com/article/special-report-super-bowl/fox-isolates-trump-and-bloomberg-super-bowl-ads-sources/2228601?mod=djemCMOToday.Google Scholar
- (2015) Consumers’ response to commercials: When the energy level in the commercial conflicts with the media context. J. Marketing 79(2):1–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Predictors of the gap between program and commercial audiences: An investigation using live tuning data. J. Marketing 74(3):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Synergy or interference: The effect of product placement on commercial break audience decline. Marketing Sci. 33(6):763–780.Link, Google Scholar
- (2016) Political advertising could be poisoning your brand. Accessed October 24, 2016, https://adage.com/article/agency-news/brand-ads-run-political-ads-drop-effectiveness/306433/.Google Scholar
- (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Does offline TV advertising affect online chatter? Quasi-experimental analysis using synthetic control. Marketing Sci. 36(6):862–878.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) Television ad-skipping, consumption complementarities and the consumer demand for advertising. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16(2):111–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) ‘Shooting,’ ‘Bomb,’ ‘Trump’: Advertisers blacklist news stories online. Wall Street Journal. (April 15), https://www.wsj.com/articles/advertisers-blacklist-hard-news-including-trump-fearing-backlash-11565879086?mod=djemCMOToday.Google Scholar
- (2018) A border strategy analysis of ad source and message tone in senatorial campaigns. Marketing Sci. 37(3):333–355.Link, Google Scholar
- (1994) Mood management across affective states: The hedonic contingency hypothesis. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 66(6):1034.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
- (2011) The role of bolstering and counterarguing mind-sets in persuasion. J. Consumer Res. 38(5):920–932.Crossref, Google Scholar

