Endogenous Evaluation and Sequential Search

References

• Anderson S , Renault R (1999) Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A Bertrand-Chamberlin-Diamond model. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):719–735.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong M , Vickers J , Zhou J (2009) Prominence and consumer search. RAND J. Econom. 40(2):209–233.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Branco F , Sun M , Villas-Boas JM (2012) Optimal search for product information. Management Sci. 58(11):2037–2056.Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon GP , Terwiesch C , Xu Y (2008) On the effects of consumer search and firm entry in a multiproduct competitive market. Marketing Sci. 27(3):461–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y , Yao S (2015) Sequential search with refinement: Model and application with click-stream data. Management Sci. 63(12):4345–4365.Link, Google Scholar
• Doval L (2018) Whether or not to open Pandora’s box. J. Econom. Theory 175(May):127–158.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dukes A , Liu L (2016) Online shopping intermediaries: The design of search environments. Management Sci. 62(4):1064–1077.Link, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K , Spiegler R (2011) A simple model of search engine pricing. Econom. J. 121(556):F329–F339.Google Scholar
• Guo L (2016) Contextual deliberation and preference construction. Management Sci. 62(10):2977–2993.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo L , Wu Y (2016) Consumer deliberation and quality signaling. Quant. Marketing Econom. 14(3):233–269.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L , Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Hong H , Shum M (2006) Using price distributions to estimate search costs. RAND J. Econom. 37(2):257–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honka E (2014) Quantifying search and switching costs in the US auto insurance industry. RAND J. Econom. 45(4):847–884.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Honka E , Chintagunta P (2016) Simultaneous or sequential? Search strategies in the U.S. auto insurance industry. Marketing Sci. 36(1):21–42.Link, Google Scholar
• Jing B (2018) Showrooming and webrooming: Information externalities between online and offline sellers. Management Sci. 37(3):469–483.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Johnson JP , Myatt DP (2006) On the simple economics of advertising, marketing, and product design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 96(3):756–784.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ke T , Shen ZM , Villas-Boas JM (2016) Search for information on multiple products. Management Sci. 62(12):3576–3603.Link, Google Scholar
• Kim J , Bronnenberg B , Albuquerque P (2010) Online demand under limited consumer search. Marketing Sci. 29(6):1001–1023.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D (2004) Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. 23(4):490–499.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D , Liao C (2018) When showrooming increases retailer profit. J. Marketing Res. 55(August):459–473.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D , Villas-Boas J (2010) When more alternatives leads to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Santos BD , Hortacsu A , Wildenbees MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitzman ML (1979) Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica 47(3):641–654.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolinsky A (1986) True monopolistic competition as a result of imperfect information. Quart. J. Econom. 101(3):493–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhong Z (2018) A model of search design. Working paper, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
• Zhou J (2014) Multiproduct search and the joint search effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(9):2918–2939.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zillow.com (2010) Despite mortgage meltdown, today’s borrowers continue to spend twice as much time researching a car purchase as researching their home loan. Press release (April 29), Zillow, Seattle. http://zillow.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=159&item=201.Google Scholar