Can Facing the Truth Improve Outcomes? Effects of Information in Consumer Finance
Published Online:18 Nov 2021https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2021.1298
References
- (2003) Effects of $9 price endings on retail sales: Evidence from field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1:93–110.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1995) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. NBER Working Paper No. 118, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2019) Asset allocation in bankruptcy. J. Finance 74(1):5–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Penny wise, dollar foolish: Buy–sell imbalances on and around round numbers. Management. Sci. 58(2):413–431.Link, Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997) HIV counseling and testing in publicly funded sites: 1995 summary report. Report, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta.Google Scholar
- (2017) Information Avoidance. J. Econom. Lit. 55(1):96–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Knowing who you actually are: The effect of feedback on short-and longer-term outcomes. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 183(March):589–615.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Social information avoidance: When, why, and how it is costly in goal pursuit. J. Marketing Res. 55(3):382–395.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) More effort with less pay: On information avoidance, optimistic beliefs and performance. Working paper, CESifo Working Paper Series, No 5542, 2015, Steffen Huck Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
- (2016) Getting to the top of mind: How reminders increase saving. Management Sci. 62(12):3393–3411.Link, Google Scholar
- (2009) The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38(2):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Health anxiety and patient behavior. J. Health Econom. 22(6):1073–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(5):2206–2236.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Regression discontinuity designs in economics. J. Econom. Lit. 48(2):281–355.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Analyzing bank overdraft fees with big data. Marketing Sci. 37(6):855–882.Link, Google Scholar
- (1987) The HIV antibody test: Why gay and bisexual men want or do not want to know their results. Public Health Rep. 102(5):468–474.Google Scholar
- (2017) Intrinsic information preferences and skewness. Preprint, submitted August 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3232350.Google Scholar
- (2017) Selective attention in consumer finance: Evidence from a randomized intervention in the credit card market. Working paper Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
- (2018) More than a penny’s worth: Left-digit bias and firm pricing. Preprint, submitted July 23, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3413019.Google Scholar
- (2015) 42 percent of users lose interest in fitness trackers after 6 months. Big Think (January 13), https://bigthink.com/ideafeed/users-lose-interest-in-fitness-trackers-after-6-months.Google Scholar
- (2015) Financial attention. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(4):863–897.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) What do consumers really pay on their checking and credit card accounts? Explicit, implicit, and avoidable costs. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(2):424–429.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Rev. General Psych. 14(4):340–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2005) Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. J. Consumer Res. 32(1):54–64.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The demand for, and impact of, learning HIV status. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(5):1829–1863.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Instrumental variables estimators and bounds on treatment effects. Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, California.Google Scholar

