Star-Cursed Lovers: Role of Popularity Information in Online Dating

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (2013) Matching markets: Theory and practice. Advances in Economics and Econometrics. 1:3–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE (2005) The New York City high school match. Amer. Econom. Rev. 95(2):364–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson M, Vogles EA, Turner E (2020) The virtues and downsides of online dating. Accessed March 15, 2021, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/02/06/the-virtues-and-downsides-of-online-dating/.Google Scholar
• Arnosti N, Johari R, Kanoria Y (2021) Managing congestion in matching markets. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management, ePub ahead of print January 19, https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0927.Google Scholar
• Baetschmann G, Staub KE, Winkelmann R (2015) Consistent estimation of the fixed effects ordered logit model. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series A 178(3):685–703.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Shmueli G, Umyarov A (2016) One-way mirrors in online dating: A randomized field experiment. Management Sci. 62(11):3100–3122.Link, Google Scholar
• Biddle JE, Hamermesh DS (1998) Beauty, productivity, and discrimination: Lawyers’ looks and lucre. J. Labor Econom. 16(1):172–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai H, Chen Y, Fang H (2009) Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):864–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron JJ, Stinson DA, Wood JV (2013) The bold and the bashful: Self-esteem, gender, and relationship initiation. Soc. Psych. Personality Sci. 4(6):685–691.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain G (1980) Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev. Econom. Stud. 47(1):225–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Che YK, Koh Y (2016) Decentralized college admissions. J. Political Econom. 124(5):1295–1338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Wang Q, Xie J (2011) Online social interactions: A natural experiment on word of mouth vs. observational learning. J. Marketing Res. 48(2):238–254.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choo E, Siow A (2006) Who marries whom and why. J. Political Econom. 114(1):175–201.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das M, Van Soest A (1999) A panel data model for subjective information on household income growth. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 40(4):409–426.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S, Ho YJ, Ramaprasad J (2017) Popularity or proximity: Characterizing the nature of social influence in an online music community. Inform. Systems Res. 28(1):117–136.Link, Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2009) Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 33(1):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ (2008) Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 94(2):245–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Iyengar SS, Kamenica E, Simonson I (2006) Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):673–697.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisman R, Iyengar SS, Kamenica E, Simonson I (2008) Racial preferences in dating. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(1):117–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fong J (2020) Search, selectivity, and market thickness in two-sided markets: Evidence from online dating. Working paper, University of Michigan Ross School of Business.Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen SL (1977) Dating choices of high school students. Family Coordinator 26(2):133–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch GJ, Hortaçsu A, Ariely D (2010a) Matching and sorting in online dating. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):130–163.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitsch GJ, Hortaçsu A, Ariely D (2010b) What makes you click? Mate preferences in online dating. Quant. Marketing Econom. 8(4):393–427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hole AR, Dickerson A, Munford L (2011) A review of estimators for the fixed-effects ordered logit model. United Kingdom Stata Users Group Meeting 2011, vol. 5 (Stata Users Group).Google Scholar
• IBISWorld (2019) Dating services industry in the US—Market research report. Accessed March 15, 2021, https://www.ibisworld.com/industry-trends/market-research-reports/other-services-except-public-administration/personal-laundry/dating-services.html.Google Scholar
• Jung J, Bapna R, Ramaprasad J, Umyarov A (2019) Love unshackled: Identifying the effect of mobile app adoption in online dating. MIS Quart. 43(1):47–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurzban R, Weeden J (2005) HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution Human Behav. 26(3):227–244.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S (2016) Effect of online dating on assortative mating: Evidence from South Korea. J. Appl. Econometrics 31(6):1120–1139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ludden J (2016) Do You Like Me? NPR (February 11). Accessed March 15, 2021, https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/02/11/466342716/do-you-like-me-swiping-leads-to-spike-in-online-dating-for-young-adults.Google Scholar
• Moretti E (2011) Social learning and peer effects in consumption: Evidence from movie sales. Rev. Econom. Stud. 78(1):356–393.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neyman J, Scott EL (1948) Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16(1):1–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Yariv L (2009) Decentralized matching with aligned preferences. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Roth AE, Sönmez T (2008) Matching and market design. Derlauf S, Blume L, eds. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. (Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, UK).Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1982) The economics of matching: Stability and incentives. Math. Oper. Res. 7(4):617–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth AE (2008) Deferred acceptance algorithms: History, theory, practice, and open questions. Internat. J. Game Theory 36(3–4):537–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: Some engineering aspects of economic design. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(4):748–780.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sotomayor MAO (1990) Two-Sided Matching (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Xing X (1997) Turnaround time and bottlenecks in market clearing: Decentralized matching in the market for clinical psychologists. J. Political Econom. 105(2):284–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Safronova V (2018) An inside look at your favorite dating sites. New York Times (April 11), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/11/style/match-shaadi-league-farmersonly-dating-apps.html.Google Scholar
• Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw Taylor L, Fiore AT, Mendelsohn G, Cheshire C (2011) “Out of my league”: A real-world test of the matching hypothesis. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 37(7):942–954.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen AT (2007) Bestseller lists and product variety. J. Indust. Econom. 55(4):715–738.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun M (2012) How does the variance of product ratings matter? Management Sci. 58(4):696–707.Link, Google Scholar
• Toch T, Aldeman C (2009) Matchmaking: Enabling mandatory public school choice in New York and Boston. Report, Education Sector, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Tucker C, Zhang J (2011) How does popularity information affect choices? A field experiment. Management Sci. 57(5):828–842.Link, Google Scholar
• Wong LY (2003) Structural estimation of marriage models. J. Labor Econom. 21(3):699–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2012) Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(1):111–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yoganarasimhan H (2013) The value of reputation in an online freelance marketplace. Marketing Sci. 32(6):860–891.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the US kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–335.Link, Google Scholar