Visibility and Peer Influence in Durable Good Adoption

References

• Ameri M, Honka E, Xie Y (2019) Word of mouth, observed adoptions, and anime-watching decisions: The role of the personal vs. the community network. Marketing Sci. 38(4):567–583.Link, Google Scholar
• Arzaghi M, Henderson JV (2007) Networking off Madison Avenue. Rev. Econom. Stud. 75(4):1011–1038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bailey M, Johnston DM, Kuchler T, Stroebel J, Wong A (2019) Peer effects in product adoption. Working paper 25843, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. 15(5):215–227.Link, Google Scholar
• Bell DR, Song S (2007) Neighborhood effects and trial on the internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing. Quant. Marketing Econom. 5:361–400.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Gillingham K (2012) Peer effects in the diffusion of solar photovoltaic panels. Marketing Sci. 31(6):900–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Burkhardt J, Gillingham K (2020) Peer effects in residential water conservation: Evidence from migration. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 12(3):107–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bradbury K, Saboo R, Johnson TL, Malof JM, Devarajan A, Zhang W, Collins LM, Newell RG (2016) Distributed solar photovoltaic array location and extent data set for remote sensing object identification. Sci. Data 3(1):1–9.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conley TG, Udry CR (2010) Learning about a new technology: Pineapple in Ghana. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(1):35–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Correia S (2016) Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: An efficient and feasible estimator. Technical report, Duke University.Google Scholar
• Correia S, Guimarães P, Zylkin T (2020) Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J. 20(1):95–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Giorgi G, Pellizzari M, Redaelli S (2010) Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. Amer. Econom. J. Appl. Econom. 2(2):241–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List J, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Saez E (2003) The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):815–842.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo E, Dupas P, Kremer M (2011) Peer effects, teacher incentives, and the impacts of tracking: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in Kenya. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(5):1739–1774.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gardete PM (2015) Social effects in the in-flight marketplace: Characterization and managerial implications. J. Marketing Res. 52(3):360–374.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaure S (2013) OLS with multiple high dimensional category variables. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 66:8–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geostellar (2013) The addressable solar market in Connecticut. Report for CEFIA, https://www.ctgreenbank.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Total_Addressable_Market_CT_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.Link, Google Scholar
• Graziano M, Gillingham K (2014) Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: The influence of neighbors and the built environment. J. Econom. Geography 15(4):815–839.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guimaraes P, Portugal P (2010) A simple feasible procedure to fit models with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J. 10(4):628–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Manchanda P, Nair H, Bothner M, Dodds P, Godes D, Hosanagar K, Tucker C (2008) Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. 19(3):287–304.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Van den Bulte C (2014) Nonmonotonic status effects in new product adoption. Marketing Sci. 33(4):509–533.Link, Google Scholar
• Iler S (2012) Assessing the potential for community solar in Durham, North Carolina. Unpublished master’s thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, den Bulte CV, Lee JY (2015) Social contagion in new product trial and repeat. Marketing Sci. 34(3):408–429.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, den Bulte CV, Valente TW (2011a) Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):195–212.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, den Bulte CV, Valente TW (2011b) Rejoinder—Further reflections on studying social influence in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. 30(2):230–232.Link, Google Scholar
• Karing A (2019) Social signaling and health behavior in low-income countries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Liu X, Lee D, Srinivasan K (2019) Large scale cross category analysis of consumer review content on sales conversion leveraging deep learning. J. Marketing Res. 56(6):918–943.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lovett MJ, Staelin R (2016) The role of paid, earned, and owned media in building entertainment brands: Reminding, informing, and enhancing enjoyment. Marketing Sci. 35(1):142–157.Link, Google Scholar
• Malof JM, Li B, Huang B, Bradbury K, Stretslov A (2019) Mapping solar array location, size, and capacity using deep learning and overhead imagery. Preprint, submitted February 28, https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.10895.Google Scholar
• Manchanda P, Xie Y, Youn N (2008) The role of targeted communication and contagion in product adoption. Marketing Sci. 27(6):961–976.Link, Google Scholar
• Manski C (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCartney WB, Shah AM (2020) ‘I’ll have what she’s having’: Identifying social influence in household mortgage decisions. Presentation, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Research Conference, December 15–16, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• McShane B, Bradlow ET, Berger J (2012) Visual influence and social groups. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):854–871.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nam S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK (2010) The effects of service quality and word-of-mouth on customer acquisition, retention and usage. Marketing Sci. 29(4):690–700.Link, Google Scholar
• Narayanan S, Nair H (2013) Estimating causal installed-base effects: A bias-correction approach. J. Marketing Res. 50(1):70–94.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman JW, Staelin R (1972) Prepurchase information seeking for new cars and major household appliances. J. Marketing Res. 9(3):249–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Punj GN, Staelin R (1983) A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. J. Consumer Res. 9(4):366–380.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E (1995) Diffusion of Innovations (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Sexton S, Kirkpatrick AJ, Harris RI, Muller NZ (2021) Heterogeneous solar capacity benefits, appropriability, and the costs of suboptimal siting. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Economists 8(6):1209–1244.Google Scholar
• Shriver SK, Nair HS, Hofstetter R (2013) Social ties and user-generated content: Evidence from an online social network. Management Sci. 59(6):1425–1443.Link, Google Scholar
• Song I, Chintagunta PK (2003) A micromodel of new product adoption with heterogeneous and forward-looking consumers: Application to the digital camera category. Quant. Marketing Econom. 1(4):371–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topa G (2001) Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 68(2):261–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Iyengar R (2011) Tricked by truncation: Spurious duration dependence and social contagion in hazard models. Marketing Sci. 30(2):233–248.Link, Google Scholar
• Van den Bulte C, Joshi YV (2007) New product diffusion with influentials and imitators. Marketing Sci. 26(3):400–421.Link, Google Scholar
• Wang HS, Noble CH, Dahl DW, Park S (2019) Successfully communicating a cocreated innovation. J. Marketing 83(4):38–57.Crossref, Google Scholar