How Viewer Tuning, Presence, and Attention Respond to Ad Content and Predict Brand Search Lift

References

• Anderson SP, Ciliberto F, Liaukonyte J (2013) Information content of advertising: Empirical evidence from the OTC analgesic industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 31(5):355–367.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson SP, Ciliberto F, Liaukonyte J, Renault R (2016) Push-me pull-you: Comparative advertising in the OTC analgesics industry. RAND J. Econom. 47(4):1029–1056.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanchard S, Noseworthy TJ, Pancer E, Poole M (2019) Visual ambiguity in product design predicts crowdfunding success. ACR North American Advances. Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Dube J-P, Mela CF (2010) Do digital video recorders influence sales? J. Marketing Res. 47:998–1010.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke RR, Srull TK (1988) Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. J. Consumer Res. 15(1):55–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran D, Srinivasan R, Sihi D (2018) Effects of offline ad content on online brand search: Insights from Super Bowl advertising. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 46:403–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Nair HS (2011) Structural workshop paper-discrete-choice models of consumer demand in marketing. Marketing Sci. 30(6):977–996.Link, Google Scholar
• Danaher PJ (1995) What happens to television ratings during commercial breaks? J. Advertising Res. 35(1):37–47. Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Mela CF (2018) TV viewing and advertising targeting. J. Marketing Res. 55(1):99–118.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dotson JP, Fan RR, McDonnell Feit E, Oldham JD, Yeh Y-H (2017) Brand attitudes and search engine queries. J. Interactive Marketing 37:105–116.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du RY, Xu L, Wilbur KC (2019) Immediate responses of online brand search and price search to TV ads. J. Marketing 83(4):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• eMarketer (2019) US TV ad spending, by type, 2017–2021. Accessed October 25, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20220113185257/https://www.emarketer.com/chart/231776/%20us-tv-ad-spending-by-type-2017-2021-billions-change.Google Scholar
• Ephron E (2006) Who watches the watchers? Accessed December 15, 2020, http://web.archive.org/web/20201218140310/https://insightandresearch.wordpress.com/2006/11/13/who-watches-the-watchers/.Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration (2020) Prescription drug advertising. Accessed December 15, 2020, http://web.archive.org/web/20210105200414/https://www.fda.gov/drugs/prescription-drug-advertising/drug-advertising-glossary-terms.Google Scholar
• Fossen BL, Schweidel DA (2019) Social TV, advertising, and sales: Are social shows good for advertisers? Marketing Sci. 38(2):274–295.Link, Google Scholar
• Fossen BL, Mallapragada G, De A (2020) Impact of political television advertisements on viewers’ response to subsequent advertisements. Marketing Sci. 40(2):305–324. Link, Google Scholar
• Friedman W (2017) Shorter-duration TV commercials on the rise. Television News Daily (October 4), https://web.archive.org/web/20210127013859/https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/308248/shorter-duration-tv-commercials-on-the-rise.html.Google Scholar
• Goettler RL, Shachar R (2001) Spatial competition in the network television industry. RAND J. Econom. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 32(4):624–656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomes R, Immorlica N, Markakis E (2009) Externalities in keyword auctions: An empirical and theoretical assessment. Leonardi S, ed. Proc. Internat. Workshop Internet Network Econom. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg), 172–183. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-10841-9_17. Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Zettelmeyer F, Bhargava N, Chapsky D (2019) A comparison of approaches to advertising measurement: Evidence from big field experiments at Facebook. Marketing Sci. 38(2):193–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Gordon BR, Jerath K, Katona Z, Narayanan S, Shin J, Wilbur KC (2021) Inefficiencies in digital advertising markets. J. Marketing 85:7–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guimaraes P, Portugal P (2010) A simple feasible procedure to fit models with high-dimensional fixed effects. Stata J. 10(4):628–649.Crossref, Google Scholar
• He C, Klein T (2018) Advertising as a reminder: Evidence from the Dutch state lottery. Working paper, ShanghaiTech University–School of Entrepreneurship and Management. Google Scholar
• He Y, Du RY, Damangir S (2014) Decomposing the impact of advertising: Augmenting sales with online search data. J. Marketing Res. 51:300–319.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iizuka T, Jin GZ (2005) The effect of prescription drug advertising on doctor visits. J. Econom. Management Strategy 14(3):701–727.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iizuka T, Jin GZ (2007) Direct to consumer advertising and prescription choice. J. Indust. Econom. 55(4):771.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW, Angrist JD (1994) Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects. Econometrica 62(2):467–475.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayasinghe L, Ritson M (2013) Everyday advertising context: An ethnography of advertising response in the family living room. J. Consumer Res. 40(1):104–121.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Liu W, Wilbur KC (2020) Divergent temporal courses for liking vs. wanting in response to persuasion. Emotion 20(2):261–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kar W, Swaminathan V, Albuquerque P (2015) Selection and ordering of linear online video ads. Proc. 9th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems, Vienna, Austria (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 203–210. Google Scholar
• Knauer L (2019) Revised MRC viewability guidelines: Everything you need to know. Accessed March 26, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20210902195246/https://www.brightcove.com/en/resources/blog/revised-mrc-viewability-guidelines-everything-you-need-know/.Google Scholar
• Kubany A, Ishay SB, Ohayon RS, Shmilovici A, Rokach L, Doitshman T (2020) Comparison of state-of-the-art deep learning APIs for image multi-label classification using semantic metrics. Expert Systems Appl. 161:113656.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker CE, Zhang X (2021) Does TV advertising increase online sales: The role of inter-temporal substitution. Working paper, London Business School.Google Scholar
• Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.Link, Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Rao JM (2015) The unfavorable economics of measuring the returns to advertising. Quart. J. Econom. 130(4):1941–1973.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Žaldokas A (2021) Background noise? TV advertising affects real-time investor behavior. Management Sci., ePub ahead of print August 10, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4003.Link, Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu X, Shum M, Uetake K (2021) Passive and active attention to baseball telecasts: Implications for content (re-)design. Working paper, New York University (NYU)–Leonard N. Stern School of Business. Google Scholar
• Liu X, Shi SW, Teixeira T, Wedel M (2018) Video content marketing: The making of clips. J. Marketing 82(July):86–101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lopez MJ, Gutman R (2017) Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: A review and new ideas. Statist. Sci. 32(3):432–454.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandese J (2004) Equitable’s no longer questionable: Data reveals nets position some advertisers better than others. Media Daily News (September 17), https://web.archive.org/web/20140829183611/https://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/18344/equitables-no-longer-questionable-data-reveals-n.html.Google Scholar
• Meder CJ, Kemper J, Brettel M (2019) How creative cues determine online response to TV commercials: An empirical investigation for digital-native brands. vom Brocke J, Gregor S, Muller O, eds. Proc. 27th European Conf. on Information Systems for a Sharing Society, (ECIS) 2019, Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden, June 8–14.Google Scholar
• Rafieian O (2019) Optimizing user engagement through adaptive ad sequencing. Working paper, SC Johnson School of Management, Cornell University, New York. Google Scholar
• Rafieian O, Yoganarasimhan H (2020) How does variety of previous ads influence consumer’s ad response? Working paper, SC Johnson School of Management, Cornell University, New York.Google Scholar
• Rajaram P, Manchanda P, Schwartz EM (2021) Finding the sweet spot: Ad targeting on streaming media. Working paper, Ivey Business School, Western University, London.Google Scholar
• Resnik A, Stern BL (1977) An analysis of information content in television advertising. J. Marketing 41(1):50–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schweidel DA, Kent RJ (2010) Predictors of the gap between program and commercial audiences: An investigation using live tuning data. J. Marketing 74(3):18–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwenzow J, Hartmann J, Schikowsky A, Heitmann M (2021) Understanding videos at scale: How to extract insights for business research. J. Bus. Res. 123:367–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shachar R, Emerson JW (2000) Cast demographics, unobserved segments, and heterogeneous switching costs in a television viewing choice model. J. Marketing Res. 37(2):173–186.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT (2018) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. J. Political Econom. 126(1):381–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro B (2022) Promoting wellness or waste? Evidence from antidepressant advertising. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconom. Forthcoming. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro B, Hitsch GJ, Tuchman A (2021) TV advertising effectiveness and profitability: Generalizable results from 288 brands. Econometrica 89(4):1855–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siddarth S, Chattopadhyay A (1998) To zap or not to zap: A study of the determinants of channel switching during commercials. Marketing Sci. 17(2):124–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Simonov A, Hill S (2021) Competitive advertising on brand search: Traffic stealing and click quality. Marketing Sci. 40(5):923–945.Link, Google Scholar
• Sinkinson M, Starc A (2018) Ask your doctor? Direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceuticals. Rev. Econom. Stud. 86(2):836–881.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sports Media Watch (2017) 2016 NFL TV ratings. Accessed August 10, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20210103192028/https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2016-nfl-tv-ratings-viewership/.Google Scholar
• Steinberg B (2021) Nielsen’s national ratings accreditation suspended by industry group. Variety (September 1), https://web.archive.org/web/20210902184602/https://variety.com/2021/tv/news/nielsen-national-ratings-suspension-media-rating-council-1235053949/.Google Scholar
• Swaminathan S, Kent R (2013) Second-by-second analysis of advertising exposure in TV pods: The dynamics of position, length, and timing. J. Advertising Res. 53(1):91–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swant M (2019) Results of IAB Tech Laboratory’s blockchain pilot shows how many digital ads are seen by humans. Accessed March 26, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20210117165610/https://www.adweek.com/performance-marketing/results-of-iab-tech-labs-blockchain-pilot-shows-how-many-digital-ads-are-seen-by-humans/.Google Scholar
• Teixeira TS, Wedel M, Pieters R (2010) Moment-to-moment optimal branding in TV commercials: Preventing avoidance by pulsing. Marketing Sci. 29(5):783–804.Link, Google Scholar
• Teixeira T, Wedel M, Pieters R (2012) Emotion-induced engagement in Internet video advertisements. J. Marketing Res. 49(2):144–159.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theocharous G, Thomas PS, Ghavamzadeh M (2015) Personalized ad recommendation systems for life-time value optimization with guarantees. Yang Q, ed. Proc. Twenty-Fourth Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), https://www.ijcai.org/Proceedings/2015/.Google Scholar
• Tsai Y-L, Honka E (2021) Informational and non-informational advertising content. Marketing Sci. 40(6):1030–1058.Link, Google Scholar
• Tuchman AE, Nair HS, Gardete PM (2018) Television ad-skipping, consumption complementarities and the consumer demand for advertising. Quant. Marketing Econom. 16(2):111–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tucker CE (2015) The reach and persuasiveness of viral video ads. Marketing Sci. 34(2):281–296.Link, Google Scholar
• Voorveld HA, Viswanathan V (2015) An observational study on how situational factors influence media multitasking with TV: The role of genres, dayparts, and social viewing. Media Psych. 18(4):499–526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webb PH (1979) Consumer initial processing in a difficult media environment. J. Consumer Res. 6(3):225–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2008) How the digital video recorder (DVR) changes traditional television advertising. J. Advertising 37(1):143–149.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC (2016) Advertising content and television advertising avoidance. J. Media Econom. 29(2):51–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilbur KC, Xu L, Kempe D (2013) Correcting audience externalities in television advertising. Marketing Sci. 32(6):892–912.Link, Google Scholar
• Yang S, Zhao Y, Erdem T, Zhao Y (2010) Modeling the intrahousehold behavioral interaction. J. Marketing Res. 47(3):470–484.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wedel M, Pieters R (2009) Sales effects of attention to feature advertisements: A Bayesian mediation analysis. J. Marketing Res. 46(5):669–681.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigmond D, Stipp H (2010) Assessing a new advertising effect: Measurement of the impact of television commercials on Internet search queries. J. Advertising Res. 50(2):162–168.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zufryden FS, Pedrick JH, Sankaralingam A (1993) Zapping and its impact on brand purchase behavior. J. Advertising Res. 33(1):58–67.Google Scholar