Time Dependence and Time Preference: Implications for Compensation Structure

References

• Abbring JH, Daljord Ø (2020) Identifying the discount factor in dynamic discrete choice models. Quant. Econom. 11(2):471–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abbring JH, Daljord Ø, Iskhakov F (2020) Identifying present‐biased discount functions in dynamic discrete choice models. Working paper, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.Google Scholar
• Ainslie G (1975) Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psych. Bull. 82(4):463–496.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ainslie G, Herrnstein RJ (1981) Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. Animal Learn. Behav. 9(4):476–482.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albers S, Mantrala MK (2008) Models for sales management decisions. Wierenga B, ed. Handbook of Marketing Decision Models (Springer, Boston), 163–210.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono P, Miller R (2011) Conditional choice probability estimation of dynamic discrete choice models with unobserved heterogeneity. Econometrica 79(6):1823–1867.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (W. H. Freeman, New York).Google Scholar
• Beshears J, Milkman KL, Schwartzstein J (2016) Beyond beta-delta: The emerging economics of personal plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):430–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JS (1948) Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relation to level of motivation. J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 41(6):450–465.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheema A, Bagchi R (2011) The effect of goal visualization on goal pursuit: Implications for consumers and managers. J. Marketing 75(2):109–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chou C, Derdenger T, Kumar V (2019) Linear estimation of aggregate dynamic discrete demand for durable goods: Overcoming the curse of dimensionality. Marketing Sci. 38(5):888–909.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Kim B, Park BG (2021a) The comprehensive effects of sales force management: A dynamic structural analysis of selection, compensation, and training. Management Sci. 67(11):7046–7074.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Kim B, Syam NB (2020) A practical approach to sales compensation: What do we know now? What should we know in the future? Foundations Trends Marketing 14(1):1–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Narayandas D, Chang D (2021b) The effects of quota frequency: Sales performance and product focus. Management Sci. 67(4):2151–2170.Link, Google Scholar
• Chung DJ, Steenburgh T, Sudhir K (2014) Do bonuses enhance sales productivity? A dynamic structural analysis of bonus-based compensation plans. Marketing Sci. 33(2):165–187.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2014) The fresh start effect: Temporal landmarks motivate aspirational behavior. Management Sci. 60(10):2563–2582.Link, Google Scholar
• Dai H, Milkman KL, Riis J (2015) Put your imperfections behind you: Temporal landmarks spur goal initiation when they signal new beginnings. Psych. Sci. 26(12):1927–1936.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Darmon R (1997) Selecting appropriate sales quota plan structures and quota-setting procedures. J. Personal Selling Sales Management 17(1):1–16.Google Scholar
• Dhami S (2016) The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).Google Scholar
• Fang H, Wang Y (2015) Estimating dynamic discrete choice models with hyperbolic discounting, with an application to mammography decisions. Internat. Econom. Rev. 56(2):565–596.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom B, Milgrom P (1987) Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica 55(2):303–328.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Shum M (2012) Nonparametric identification of dynamic models with unobserved state variables. J. Econometrics 171(1):32–44.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull CL (1932) The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psych. Rev. 39(1):25–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull CL (1934) The rat’s speed-of-locomotion gradient in the approach to food. J. Comparative Psych. 17(3):393–422.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hull CL (1938) The goal-gradient hypothesis applied to some “field-force” problems in the behavior of young children. Psych. Rev. 45(4):271–298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ishihara M, Ching AT (2019) Dynamic demand for new and used durable goods without physical depreciation: The case of Japanese video games. Marketing Sci. 38(3):392–416.Link, Google Scholar
• Kamakura WA, Russell G (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. 26(4):379–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kishore S, Rao RS, Narasimhan O, John G (2013) Bonuses versus commissions: A field study. J. Marketing Res. 50(3):317–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kivetz R, Urminsky O, Zheng Y (2006) The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. J. Marketing Res. 43(1):39–58.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laibson D (1997) Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. 112(2):443–478.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lal R, Srinivasan V (1993) Compensation plans for single-and multi-product salesforces: An application of the Holmstrom-Milgrom model. Management Sci. 39(7):777–793.Link, Google Scholar
• LeBoeuf RA, Williams EF, Brenner LA (2014) Forceful phantom firsts: Framing experiences as firsts amplifies their influence on judgment. J. Marketing Res. 51(4):420–432.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Förster J (2008) Expectancy, value and psychological distance: A new look at goal gradients. Social Cognition 26(5):515–533.Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Prelec D (1992) Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. 107(2):573–597.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Magnac T, Thesmar D (2002) Identifying dynamic discrete decision processes. Econometrica 70(2):801–816.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marinova D, Singh SK, Singh J (2018) Frontline problem-solving effectiveness: A dynamic analysis of verbal and nonverbal cues. J. Marketing Res. 55(2):178–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marlatt GA, Kaplan BE (1972) Self-initiated attempts to change behavior—A study of New Year’s resolutions. Psych. Rep. 30(1):123–131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Misra S, Nair HS (2011) A structural model of sales-force compensation dynamics: Estimation and field implementation. Quant. Marketing Econom. 9(3):211–257.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahm IY, Ahearne MJ, Lee N, Tirunillai S (2022) Managing positive and negative trends in sales call outcomes: The role of momentum. J. Marketing Res. 59(6):1120–1140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norcross JC, Mrykalo MS, Blagys MD (2002) Auld lang syne: Success predictors, change processes, and self-reported outcomes of New Year’s resolvers and nonresolvers. J. Clin. Psych. 58(4):397–405.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunes JC, Drèze X (2006) The endowed progress effect: How artificial advancement increases effort. J. Consumer Res. 32(4):504–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M (1999) Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):103–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oyer P (1998) Fiscal year ends and nonlinear incentive contracts: The effect on business seasonality. Quart. J. Econom. 113(1):149–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peetz J, Wilson AE (2013) The post-birthday world: Consequences of temporal landmarks for temporal self-appraisal and motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 104(2):249–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phelps ES, Pollak RA (1968) On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Rev. Econom. Stud. 35(2):185–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rajagopal P, Rha J-Y (2009) The mental accounting of time. J. Econom. Psych. 30(5):772–781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson JA (1986) Temporal reference systems and autobiographical memory. Rubin DC, ed. Autobiographical Memory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 159–188.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rouziès D, Onyemah V (2018) Sales force compensation: Trends and research opportunities. Foundations Trends Marketing 11(3):143–214.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rust J (1994) Structural estimation of Markov decision processes. Engle RF, McFadden DL, eds. Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4, (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 3081–3143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1937) A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econom. Stud. 4(2):155–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schöttner A (2017) Optimal sales force compensation in dynamic settings: Commissions vs. bonuses. Management Sci. 63(5):1529–1544.Link, Google Scholar
• Shum MS (1998) The role of temporal landmarks in autobiographical memory processes. Psych. Bull. 124(3):423–442.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soman D (2001) The mental accounting of sunk time costs: Why time is not like money. Behav. Decision Making 14(3):169–185.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soster RL, Monga A, Bearden WO (2010) Tracking costs of time and money: How accounting periods affect mental accounting. J. Consumer Res. 37(4):712–721.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH (1981) Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. 8(3):201–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Ganser LJ (2015) Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics (WW Norton, New York).Google Scholar
• Touré-Tillery M, Fishbach A (2012) The end justifies the means, but only in the middle. J. Experiment. Psych. Gen. 141(3):570–583.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tu Y, Soman D (2014) The categorization of time and its impact on task initiation. J. Consumer Res. 41(3):810–822.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yao S, Mela CF, Chiang J, Chen Y (2012) Determining consumers’ discount rates with field studies. J. Marketing Res. 49(6):822–841.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeigarnik B (1927) Studies concerning action and affect psychology, III. The retaining of completed and uncompleted actions. Psychologische Forschung 9:1–85.Google Scholar