Frontiers: Smoke and Mirrors: Impact of E-cigarette Taxes on Underage Social Media Posting

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0241

References

  • Abadie A (2021) Using synthetic controls: Feasibility, data requirements, and methodological aspects. J. Econom. Literature 59(2):391–425.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Abouk R, Courtemanche CJ, Dave DM, Feng B, Friedman AS, Maclean JC, Pesko MF, et al. (2021) Intended and unintended effects of e-cigarette taxes on youth tobacco use. NBER Working Paper No. 29216, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Allcott H, Rafkin C (2020) Optimal regulation of e-cigarettes: Theory and evidence. NBER Working Paper No. 27000, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • An R, Sturm R (2011) Does the response to alcohol taxes differ across racial/ethnic groups? Some evidence from 1984–2009 behavioral risk factor surveillance system. J. Mental Health Policy Econom. 14(1):13.Google Scholar
  • Apelberg BJ, Feirman SP, Salazar E, Corey CG, Ambrose BK, Paredes A, Richman E, et al. (2018) Potential public health effects of reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes in the United States. New England J. Medicine 378(18):1725–1733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barrington-Trimis JL, Urman R, Berhane K, Unger JB, Cruz TB, Pentz MA, Samet JM, et al. (2016) E-cigarettes and future cigarette use. Pediatrics 138(1):e20160379.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS, Murphy KM (1988) A theory of rational addiction. J. Political Econom. 96(4):675–700.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE (1994) Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. The implications for tobacco regulation. New England J. Medicine 331(2):123–125.Google Scholar
  • Chaloupka F (1991) Rational addictive behavior and cigarette smoking. J. Political Econom. 99(4):722–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen J, Rao VR (2020) A dynamic model of rational addiction with stockpiling and learning: An empirical examination of e-cigarettes. Management Sci. 66(12):5886–5905.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chun LF, Moazed F, Calfee CS, Matthay MA, Gotts JE (2017) Pulmonary toxicity of e-cigarettes. Amer. J. Physiology Lung Cellular Molecular Physiology 313(2):L193–L206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cotti C, Courtemanche C, Maclean JC, Nesson E, Pesko MF, Tefft NW (2022) The effects of e-cigarette taxes on e-cigarette prices and tobacco product sales: Evidence from retail panel data. J. Health Econom. 86:102676.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Czaplicki L, Kostygina G, Kim Y, Perks SN, Szczypka G, Emery SL, Vallone D, et al. (2020) Characterising juul-related posts on instagram. Tobacco Control 29(6):612–617.Google Scholar
  • Garrett BE, Gardiner PS, Wright LTC, Pechacek TF (2016) The African American youth smoking experience: An overview. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 18(suppl 1):S11–S15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman M, Sindelar JL, Mullahy J, Anderson R (1993) Policy watch: Alcohol and cigarette taxes. J. Econom. Perspective 7(4):211–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision Pattern Recognition (IEEE, New York), 770–778.Google Scholar
  • Henriksen L, Schleicher NC, Johnson TO, Andersen-Rodgers E, Zhang X, Williams R (2019) Mind the gap: Changes in cigarette prices after california’s tax increase. Tobacco Regulatory Sci. 5(6):532.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karkkainen K, Joo J (2021) Fairface: Face attribute data set for balanced race, gender, and age for bias measurement and mitigation. Proc. IEEE/CVF Winter Conf. Appl. Computer Vision (IEEE, New York), 1548–1558.Google Scholar
  • Kong G, Kuguru KE, Krishnan-Sarin S (2017) Gender differences in us adolescent e-cigarette use. Current Addiction Rep. 4:422–430.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kong G, Schott AS, Lee J, Dashtian H, Murthy D (2023) Understanding e-cigarette content and promotion on YouTube through machine learning. Tobacco Control 32(6):739–746.Google Scholar
  • Lewit EM, Coate D, Grossman M (1981) The effects of government regulation on teenage smoking. J. Law Econom. 24(3):545–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li KT, Sonnier GP (2023) Statistical inference for the factor model approach to estimate causal effects in quasi-experimental settings. J. Marketing Res. 60(3):449–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin C, Gaiha SM, Halpern-Felsher B (2022) Nicotine dependence from different e-cigarette devices and combustible cigarettes among us adolescent and young adult users. Internat. J. Environment. Res. Public Health 19(10):5846.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin T-Y, Maire M, Belongie S, Hays J, Perona P, Ramanan D, Dollár P, Zitnick CL (2014) Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. (Springer, Berlin), 740–755.Google Scholar
  • Miech R, Patrick ME, O’Malley PM, Johnston LD (2017) E-cigarette use as a predictor of cigarette smoking: Results from a 1-year follow-up of a national sample of 12th grade students. Tobacco Control 26(e2):e106–e111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson JP (2014) Gender differences in alcohol demand: A systematic review of the role of prices and taxes. Health Econom. 23(10):1260–1280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ngo A, Fong GT, Craig LV, Shang C (2019) Analysis of gender differences in the impact of taxation and taxation structure on cigarette consumption in 17 ITC countries. Internat. J. Environment. Res. Public Health 16(7):1275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Primack BA, Bost JE, Land SR, Fine MJ (2007) Volume of tobacco advertising in African American markets: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Rep. 122(5):607–615.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soneji S, Barrington-Trimis JL, Wills TA, Leventhal AM, Unger JB, Gibson LA, Yang JW, et al. (2017) Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics 171(8):788–797.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenkamp JEM, Fang E (2011) The impact of economic contractions on the effectiveness of R&D and advertising: Evidence from us companies spanning three decades. Marketing Sci. 30(4):628–645.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tuchman AE (2019) Advertising and demand for addictive goods: The effects of e-cigarette advertising. Marketing Sci. 38(6):994–1022.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Vassey J, Metayer C, Kennedy CJ, Whitehead TP (2020) # vape: Measuring e-cigarette influence on instagram with deep learning and text analysis. Frontiers Comm. 4:75.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu Y (2017) Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Anal. 25(1):57–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.