Advertising as a Reminder: Evidence from the Dutch State Lottery

References

• Abaluck J, Adams-Prassl A (2021) What do consumers consider before they choose? Identification from asymmetric demand responses. Quart. J. Econom. 136(3):1611–1663.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg DA (2001) Empirically distinguishing informative and prestige effects of advertising. RAND J. Econom. 32(2):316–333.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ackerberg DA (2003) Advertising, learning, and consumer choice in experience good markets: An empirical examination. Internat. Econom. Rev. 44(3):1007–1040.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allenby GM, Ginter JL (1995) The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 12(1):67–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1701–1844.Google Scholar
• Blattberg RC, Briesch R, Fox EJ (1995) How promotions work. Marketing Sci. 14(3):G122–G132.Link, Google Scholar
• Bronnenberg BJ, Vanhonacker WR (1996) Limited choice sets, local price response, and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):163–173.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calzolari G, Nardotto M (2016) Effective reminders. Management Sci. 63(9):2915–2932.Link, Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran D, Srinivasan R, Sihi D (2018) Effects of offline ad content on online brand search: Insights from Super Bowl advertising. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 46(3):403–430.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Groote O, Verboven F (2019) Subsidies and time discounting in new technology adoption: Evidence from solar photovoltaic systems. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(6):2137–2172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M (2010) Persuasion: Empirical evidence. Annual Rev. Econom. 2(1):643–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Draganska M, Klapper D (2011) Choice set heterogeneity and the role of advertising: An analysis with micro and macro data. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):653–669.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Du RY, Xu L, Wilbur KC (2019) Immediate responses of online brand search and price search to TV ads. J. Marketing 83(4):81–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé J-P, Hitsch GJ, Manchanda P (2005) An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quant. Marketing Econom. 3(2):107–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gabaix X (2019) Behavioral inattention. Bernheim BD, DellaVigna S, Laibson D, eds. Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 261–343.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartmann WR, Klapper D (2017) Super Bowl ads. Marketing Sci. 37(1):78–96.Link, Google Scholar
• Heiss F, McFadden D, Winter J, Wuppermann A, Zhou B (2021) Inattention and switching costs as sources of inertia in Medicare Part D. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(9):2737–2781.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho K, Hogan J, Scott Morton F (2017) The impact of consumer inattention on insurer pricing in the Medicare Part D program. RAND J. Econom. 48(4):877–905.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hortaçsu A, Madanizadeh SA, Puller SL (2017) Power to choose? An analysis of choice frictions in the residential electricity market. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 9(4):192–226.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Lodish LM, Krieger AM (2007) An analysis of real world TV advertising tests: A 15-year update. J. Advertising Res. 47(3):341–353.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inman JJ, McAlister L (1994) Do coupon expiration dates affect consumer behavior? J. Marketing Res. 31(3):423–428.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Zhu Y (2016) Effects of TV advertising on keyword search. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 33(3):508–523.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joo M, Wilbur KC, Cowgill B, Zhu Y (2014) Television advertising and online search. Management Sci. 60(1):56–73.Link, Google Scholar
• Krugman HE (1972) Why three exposures may be enough. J. Adverting Res. 12(6):11–14.Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker CE, Zhang X (2022) TV advertising and online sales: A case study of intertemporal substitution effects for online hotel bookings. Preprint, submitted July 28, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3530105.Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Reiley DH (2013) Down-to-the-minute effects of super bowl advertising on online search behavior. Proc. Fourteenth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (ACM, New York), 639–656.Google Scholar
• Liaukonyte J, Teixeira T, Wilbur KC (2015) Television advertising and online shopping. Marketing Sci. 34(3):311–330.Link, Google Scholar
• Lodish LM, Abraham M, Kalmenson S, Livelsberger J, Lubetkin B, Richardson B, Stevens ME (1995) How TV advertising works: A meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable TV advertising experiments. J. Marketing Res. 32(2):125–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P, Mariotti M (2014) Stochastic choice and consideration sets. Econometrica 82(3):1153–1176.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehta N, Chen X, Narasimhan O (2008) Informing, transforming, and persuading: Disentangling the multiple effects of advertising on brand choice decisions. Marketing Sci. 27(3):334–355.Link, Google Scholar
• Melnikov O (2013) Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the U.S. computer printer market. Econom. Inquiry 51(2):1277–1298.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JH, Lattin JM (1991) Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):429–440.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts JH, Lattin JM (1997) Consideration: Review of research and prospects for future insights. J. Marketing Res. 34(3):406–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossiter JR, Percy L (1987) Advertising and Promotion Management (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
• Sahni NS (2015) Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(3):203–247.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT (2018) Positive spillovers and free riding in advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals: The case of antidepressants. J. Political Econom. 126(1):381–437.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro BT, Hitsch GJ, Tuchman AE (2021) TV advertising effectiveness and profitability: Generalizable results from 288 brands. Econometrica 89(4):1855–1879.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro JM (2022) A “memory-jamming” theory of advertising. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Sovinsky Goeree M (2008) Limited information and advertising in the U.S. personal computer industry. Econometrica 76(5):1017–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephens-Davidowitz S, Varian H, Smith MD (2017) Super returns to super bowl ads? Quant. Marketing Econom. 15(1):1–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terui N, Ban M, Allenby GM (2011) The effect of media advertising on brand consideration and choice. Marketing Sci. 30(1):74–91.Link, Google Scholar
• Van Nierop E, Bronnenberg B, Paap R, Wedel M, Franses PH (2010) Retrieving unobserved consideration sets from household panel data. J. Marketing Res. 47(1):63–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigmond D, Stipp H (2010) Assessing a new advertising effect: Measurement of the impact of television commercials on Internet search queries. J. Adverting Res. 50(2):162–168.Crossref, Google Scholar