Consumer Reviews and Regulation: Evidence from New York City Restaurants

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.0088

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. 84(3):488–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow KJ (1963) Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Amer. Econom. Rev. 53(5):941–973.Google Scholar
  • Bao Y, Fang L, Osborne M (2024) The effect of quality disclosure on firm entry and exit dynamics: Evidence from online review platforms. Preprint, submitted August 12, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4804928.Google Scholar
  • Barrios JM (2022) Occupational licensing and accountant quality: Evidence from the 150-hour rule. J. Accounting Res. 60(1):3–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blair PQ, Fisher M (2022) Does occupational licensing reduce value creation on digital platforms? NBER Working Paper No. 30388, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Cabral L, Hortaçsu A (2010) The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from ebay. J. Indust. Econom. 58(1):54–78.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen MK, Chevalier JA, Rossi PE, Oehlsen E (2019) The value of flexible work: Evidence from uber drivers. J. Political Econom. 127(6):2735–2794.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M, Sundararajan A (2015) Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. University Chicago Law Rev. Dialogue 82(1):116–133. Google Scholar
  • Cohen P, Hahn R, Hall J, Levitt S, Metcalfe R (2016) Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of Uber. NBER Working Paper No. 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Dai W, Luca M (2020) Digitizing disclosure: The case of restaurant hygiene scores. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 12(2):41–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dai W, Jin G, Lee J, Luca M (2018) Aggregation of consumer ratings: an application to Yelp.com. Quant. Mark. Econ. 16(3):289–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Einav L, Farronato C, Levin JD (2016) Peer-to-peer markets. Annual Rev. Econom. 8(1):615–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fang L (2022) The effects of online review platforms on restaurant revenue, consumer learning, and welfare. Management Sci. 68(11):8116–8143.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Farronato C, Fradkin A (2022) The welfare effects of peer entry: The case of Airbnb and the accommodation industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. 112(6):1782–1817.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farronato C, Fradkin A, Larsen BJ, Brynjolfsson E (2024) Consumer protection in an online world: An analysis of occupational licensing. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 16(3):549–579.Google Scholar
  • Fradkin A, Grewal E, Holtz D (2018) Reciprocity and unveiling in two-sided reputation systems: Evidence from an experiment on Airbnb. Marketing Sci. 40(6):1013–1029.Google Scholar
  • Gentzkow M, Kelly B, Taddy M (2019a) Text as data. J. Econom. Literature 57(3):535–574.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentzkow M, Shapiro JM, Taddy M (2019b) Measuring group differences in high-dimensional choices: Method and application to congressional speech. Econometrica 87(4):1307–1340.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glaeser EL, Hillis A, Kominers SD, Luca M (2016) Crowdsourcing city government: Using tournaments to improve inspection accuracy. Amer. Econom. Rev. 106(5):114–118.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenstein S, Gu G, Zhu F (2021) Ideology and composition among an online crowd: Evidence from wikipedians. Management Sci. 67(5):3067–3086.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison C, Jorder M, Stern H, Stavinsky F, Reddy V, Hanson H, Waechter H, et al. (2014) Using online reviews by restaurant patrons to identify unreported cases of foodborne illness: New York City, 2012–2013. Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 63(20):441–445.Google Scholar
  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) Unsupervised learning. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, New York), 485–585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He S, Hollenbeck B, Proserpio D (2022) The market for fake reviews. Marketing Sci. 41(5):896–921.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hollenbeck B, Moorthy S, Proserpio D (2019) Advertising strategy in the presence of reviews: An empirical analysis. Marketing Sci. 38(5):793–811.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ibanez MR, Toffel MW (2020) How scheduling can bias quality assessment: Evidence from food-safety inspections. Management Sci. 66(6):2396–2416.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Leslie P (2003) The effect of information on product quality: Evidence from restaurant hygiene grade cards. Quart. J. Econom. 118(2):409–451.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Leslie P (2009) Reputational incentives for restaurant hygiene. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconom. 1(1):237–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Lu Z, Zhou X, Li C (2022) The effects of government licensing on e-commerce: Evidence from Alibaba. The J. Law Econom. 65(S1):S191–S221.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kang JS, Kuznetsova P, Luca M, Choi Y (2013) Where not to eat? Improving public policy by predicting hygiene inspections using online reviews. Proc. 2013 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), Stroudsburg, PA), 1443–1448.Google Scholar
  • Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, Ye Q, Liu T-Y (2017) Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 3149–3157.Google Scholar
  • Kim H, Glaeser EL, Hillis A, Kominers SD, Luca M (2024) Decision authority and the returns to algorithms. Strategic Management J. 45(4):619–648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleiner MM, Soltas EJ (2023) A welfare analysis of occupational licensing in US states. Rev. Econom. Stud. 90(5):2481–2516.Google Scholar
  • Kugler AD, Sauer RM (2005) Doctors without borders? Relicensing requirements and negative selection in the market for physicians. J. Labor Econom. 23(3):437–465.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lehman DW, Kovács B, Carroll GR (2014) Conflicting social codes and organizations: Hygiene and authenticity in consumer evaluations of restaurants. Management Sci. 60(10):2602–2617.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis G, Zervas G (2016) The welfare impact of consumer reviews: A case study of the hotel industry. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Luca M (2016) Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of yelp.com. Preprint, submitted March 15, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1928601.Google Scholar
  • Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62(12):3412–3427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(8):2421–2455.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mejia J, Mankad S, Gopal A (2019) A for effort? Using the crowd to identify moral hazard in New York city restaurant hygiene inspections. Inform. Systems Res. 30(4):1363–1386.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nosko C, Tadelis S (2015) The limits of reputation in platform markets: An empirical analysis and field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 20830, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Porter MF (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program Electronic Library Inform. Systems 14(3):130–137.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Resnick P, Zeckhauser R (2002) Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. Baye MR, ed. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 127–157.Google Scholar
  • Shapiro C (1986) Investment, moral hazard, and occupational licensing. Rev. Econom. Stud. 53(5):843–862.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stock J, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. Identification and Inference for Econometric Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taddy M (2013) Multinomial inverse regression for text analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 108(503):755–770.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taddy M (2015) Distributed multinomial regression. Ann. Appl. Statist. 9(3):1394–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.