Bad Apples on Rotten Tomatoes: Critics, Crowds, and Gender Bias in Product Ratings

References

• Aguiar L, Waldfogel J, Waldfogel S (2021) Playlisting favorites: Measuring platform bias in the music industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 78:102765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107:797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bayerl A, Dover Y, Riemer H, Shapira D (2024) Gender rating gap in online reviews. Nature Human Behav., ePub ahead of print October 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02003-6.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100:992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bohren JA, Imas A, Rosenberg M (2019) The dynamics of discrimination: Theory and evidence. Amer. Econom. Rev. 109(10):3395–3436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Botelho TL, Gertsberg M (2022) The disciplining effect of status: Evaluator status awards and observed gender bias in evaluations. Management Sci. 68(7):5311–5329.Link, Google Scholar
• Boudreau K (2019) “Crowds” of amateurs & professional entrepreneurs in marketplaces. Preprint, submitted June 19, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2988308.Google Scholar
• Boyd RL, Ashokkumar A, Seraj S, Pennebaker JW (2022) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC-22. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
• Boyle K (2014) Gender, comedy and reviewing culture on the Internet Movie Database. Participations 11:31–49.Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43:345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choueiti M, Smith SL, Pieper K, Case A (2018) Critic’s choice? Gender and race/ethnicity of film reviewers across 100 top films of 2017. USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative report, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Goldsmith-Pinkham P, Jensen K (2023) Anonymity and identity online. Preprint, submitted September 24, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15948.Google Scholar
• Fowdur L, Kadiyali V, Prince J (2012) Racial bias in expert quality assessment: A study of newspaper movie reviews. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 84:292–307.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23:545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva JC (2012) Sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31:448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) “Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90:715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Zhu F (2018) Do experts or crowd-based models produce more bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia. MIS Quart. 42(3):945–960.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greenstein S, Gu G, Zhu F (2021) Ideology and composition among an online crowd: Evidence from Wikipedians. Management Sci. 67:3067–3086.Link, Google Scholar
• He S, Hollenbeck B, Proserpio D (2022) The market for fake reviews. Marketing Sci. 41(5):896–921.Link, Google Scholar
• Hinnosaar M (2019) Gender inequality in new media: Evidence from Wikipedia. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 163:262–276.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holbrook MB (1999) Popular appeal versus expert judgments of motion pictures. J. Consumer Res. 26:144–155.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht A, Tucker C (2019) Algorithmic bias? An empirical study of apparent gender-based discrimination in the display of STEM career ads. Management Sci. 65:2966–2981.Link, Google Scholar
• Lauzen MM (2018) Thumbs down 2019: Film critics and gender, and why it matters. Report, Center for the Study of Women in Television and Film, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
• Leung TC, Strumpf KS (2022) Discrimination in the publishing industry? Preprint, submitted September 3, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3660289.Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19:456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Luca M (2015) User-generated content and social media. Anderson SP, Waldfogel J, Strömberg D, eds. Handbook of Media Economics, vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 563–592.Google Scholar
• Luca M, Zervas G (2016) Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Sci. 62:3412–3427.Link, Google Scholar
• Luo H, Zhang L (2022) Scandal, social movement, and change: Evidence from #MeToo in Hollywood. Management Sci. 68:1278–1296.Link, Google Scholar
• Mayzlin D, Dover Y, Chevalier J (2014) Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104:2421–2455.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31:372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Trusov M (2011) The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Marketing Res. 48:444–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mollick E, Nanda R (2016) Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Sci. 62:1533–1553.Link, Google Scholar
• Nagaraj A, Ranganathan A (2023) Cutting through the (digital) clutter: Technological change and careers of men and women in cultural markets. Working paper, University of California-Berkeley, Haas School of Business, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Francis ME, Booth RJ (2001) Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2001 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ).Google Scholar
• Proserpio D, Troncoso I, Valsesia F (2021) Does gender matter? The effect of management responses on reviewing behavior. Marketing Sci. 40:1199–1213.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Reimers I, Waldfogel J (2021) Digitization and pre-purchase information: The causal and welfare impacts of reviews and crowd ratings. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111:1944–1971.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinstein DA, Snyder CM (2005) The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. J. Indust. Econom. 53:27–51.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A, Grad T, Ferreira P, Claussen J (2024) (How) does user-generated content impact content generated by professionals? Evidence from local news. Management Sci. 70(9):6045–6068.Abstract, Google Scholar
• Smith SL, Choueiti M, Pieper KM, Case A, Choi A (2018) Inequality in 1,100 popular films: Examining portrayals of gender, race/ethnicity, LGBT & disability from 2007 to 2017. USC Annenberg Inclusion Initiative report, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
• Stroube BK, Waguespack DM (2024) Status and consensus: Heterogeneity in audience evaluations of female-versus male-lead films. Strategic Management J. 45(5):994–1024.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldfogel J (2023) The Welfare effect of gender-inclusive intellectual property creation: Evidence from books. NBER Working Paper No. 30987, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Wu AH (2020) Gender bias in rumors among professionals: An identity-based interpretation. Rev. Econom. Statist. 102(5):867–880.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Zhang X (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J. Marketing 74:133–148.Crossref, Google Scholar