Making Inclusive Product Design a Reality: How Company Culture and Research Bias Impact Investment

References

• Baer M, Frese M (2002) Innovation is not enough, climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 24(1):45–68.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagnoli M, Watts SG (2003) Selling to socially responsible consumers: Competition and the private provision of public goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy 12(3):419–445.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banaji MR, Greenwald AG (2016) Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People (Bantam, New York).Google Scholar
• Baron DP (2001) Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. J. Econom. Management Strategy 10(1):7–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron DP (2009) A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. J. Econom. Management Strategy 18(1):7–43.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergemann D, Brooks B, Morris S (2015) The limits of price discrimination. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(3):921–957.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casey C (2020) Do your d&i efforts include people with disabilities? Harvard Bus. Rev. Accessed March 23, 2023, https://hbr.org/2020/03/do-your-di-efforts-include-people-with-disabilities.Google Scholar
• Choi J, Bell DR (2011) Preference minorities and the Internet. J. Marketing Res. 48(4):670–682.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choo A, Linderman K, Schroeder R (2007) Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects. Management Sci. 53(3):437–450.Link, Google Scholar
• Clark TR (2020) The 4 Stages of Psychological Safety: Defining the Path to Inclusion and Innovation (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Oakland, CA).Google Scholar
• Coughlan AT, Sen SK (1989) Salesforce compensation: Theory and managerial implications. Marketing Sci. 8(4):324–342.Link, Google Scholar
• Edmonson A (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 44(2):350–383.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC (2011) Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Bus. Rev. 89(4):48–55.Google Scholar
• Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S, Klinger RL, Pezeshkan A, Vracheva V (2017) Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personality Psych. 70(1):113–165.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein I, Leitner Y (2018) Stress tests and information disclosure. J. Econom. Theory 177:34–69.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J. Law Econom. 24(3):461–483.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmes K (2018) Mismatch: How Inclusion Shapes Design. Simplicity: Design, Technology, Business, Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Soberman D (2000) Markets for product modification information. Marketing Sci. 19(3):203–225.Link, Google Scholar
• Iyer G, Soberman DA (2016) Social responsibility and product innovation. Marketing Sci. 35:727–742.Link, Google Scholar
• Jehiel P (2015) On transparency in organizations. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(2):736–761.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Ni J, Srinivasan K (2014) Signaling through pricing by service providers with social preferences. Marketing Sci. 33(5):641–654.Link, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B, Rob R (1987) Demand-driven innovation and spatial competition over time. Rev. Econom. Stud. 54(1):63–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E (2019) Bayesian persuasion and information design. Annu. Rev. Econom. 11:249–272.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kamenica E, Gentzkow M (2011) Bayesian persuasion. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(6):2590–2615.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katona Z (2015) Democracy in product design: Consumer participation and differentiation strategies. Quant. Marketing Econom. 13(4):359–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotchen MJ (2006) Green markets and private provision of public goods. J. Political Econom. 114(4):816–834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lauga DO, Ofek E (2009) Market research and innovation strategy in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. 28(2):373–396.Link, Google Scholar
• Lee JY, Swink M, Pandejpong T (2011) The roles of worker expertise, information sharing quality, and psychological safety in manufacturing process innovation: An intellectual capital perspective. Production Oper. Management 20(4):556–570.Google Scholar
• McGregor L, Doshi N (2015) How company culture shapes employee motivation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 11:1–13.Google Scholar
• Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P, Roberts J (1986) Relying on the information of interested parties. RAND J. Econom. 17(1):18–32.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murtell J (2021) The 5 phases of design thinking. Accessed March 23, 2023, https://www.ama.org/marketing-news/the-5-phases-of-design-thinking/.Google Scholar
• Nalty K (2016) Strategies for confronting unconscious bias. Colorado Lawyer 45(5):45–52.Google Scholar
• Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N (2017) Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resources Management Rev. 27(3):521–535.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ofek E, Turut O (2008) To innovate or imitate? Entry strategy and the role of market research. J. Marketing Res. 45(5):575–592.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patrick VM, Hollenbeck CR (2021) Designing for all: Consumer response to inclusive design. J. Consumer Psych. 31(2):360–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raviselvam S, Subburaj K, Hölttä-Otto K, Wood KL (2022) Systematic application of extreme-user experiences: Impact on the outcomes of an undergraduate medical device design module. Biomedical Engineering Education 2(2):233–252.Google Scholar
• Russo D (2010) Applaud Employee Effort, but Reward Real Contribution (Pearson Education, London).Google Scholar
• Sarin S, Mahajan V (2001) The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. J. Marketing 65(2):35–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schein E, Bennis W (1965) Personal and Organizational Change Through Group Methods: The Laboratory Approach (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
• Shaw C, Nickpour F (2021) A framework for transitioning designerly ways: Interrogating 50 years of inclusive design for paediatric mobility. Design J. 24(6):977–999.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tauke B, Smith K, Davis C (2016) Diversity and Design: Understanding Hidden Consequences (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York).Google Scholar
• Tellis G, Prahbu J, Chandy R (2009) Radical innovation across nations: The pre-eminence of corporate culture. J. Marketing 73(2):3–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psych. 5(2):207–232.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Sluis H, Samper A, Kristofferson K, Hlava T (2022) The disability preference stereotype: Physical disability shapes inferences of utilitarian and hedonic preferences Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Zhang K, Xie J (2020) Bad greenwashing, good greenwashing: Corporate social responsibility and information transparency. Management Sci. 66:3095–3112.Link, Google Scholar