Commentary on “Frontiers: Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Empowering Female Entrepreneurs Through Female Mentors”

References

• Akinola M, Martin AE, Phillips KW (2018) To delegate or not to delegate: Gender differences in affective associations and behavioral responses to delegation. Acad. Management J. 61(4):1467–1491.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TD, Eby LT, Lentz E (2006) Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. 91(3):567–578.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TD, Poteet ML, Burroughs SM (1997) The mentor’s perspective: A qualitative inquiry and future research agenda. J. Vocational Behav. 51(1):70–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TD, Eby LT, O’Brien KE, Lentz E (2008) The state of mentoring research: A qualitative review of current research methods and future research implications. J. Vocational Behav. 73(3):343–357.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L (2004) Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 89(1):127–136.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2009) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Campbell EL, Aven B, Chow RM (2023) From exception to exceptional: How gender and tenure impact sponsor effectiveness. Acad. Management Discovery 9(1):17–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman JA, Sharps D, Mishra S, Kray LJ, North MS (2022) Agentic but not warm: Age-gender interactions and the consequences of stereotype incongruity perceptions for middle-aged professional women. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 173(7):104190.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahling JJ, Taylor SR, Chau SL, Dwight SA (2016) Does coaching matter? A multilevel model linking managerial coaching skill and frequency to sales goal attainment. Personality Psych. 69(4):863–894.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobbin F, Kalev A (2022) Getting to Diversity: What Works and What Doesn’t (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
• Ely RJ (1994) The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Admin. Sci. Quart. 39(2):203–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ely RJ, Thomas DA (2001) Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Admin. Sci. Quart. 46(2):229–273.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldberg AC (2022) The task bind: Explaining gender differences in managerial tasks and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. 67(4):1049–1092.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallen Y, Wasserman M (2023) Does information affect homophily? J. Public Econom. 222:104876.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Germann F, Andersen S, Chintagunta P, Vilcassim N (2024) Frontiers: Breaking the glass ceiling: Empowering female entrepreneurs through female mentors. Marketing Sci. 43(2):239–468.Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ (1999) The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. J. Experiment. Psych. Appl. 5(2):205–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds PJ, Patterson M, Pfeffer J (2001) Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. J. Appl. Psych. 86(6):1232–1243.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H, Carter NM, Silva C (2010) Why men still get more promotions than women: Your high-potential females need more than just well-meaning mentors. Harvard Bus. Rev. 88(9):80–85.Google Scholar
• Kalev A, Dobbin F, Kelly E (2006) Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 71(4):589–617.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanze D, Huang L, Conley MA, Tory Higgins E (2018) We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Acad. Management J. 61(2):586–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A (2001) Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 80(6):942–958.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Cotton JL (1999) Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. J. Appl. Psych. 84(4):529–550.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, McFarlin DB (1990) Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. J. Vocational Behav. 37(3):321–339.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ragins BR, Scandura TA (1999) Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. J. Organ. Behav. 20(4):493–509.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas DA (1990) The impact of race on managers’ experiences of developmental relationships (mentoring and sponsorship): An intra‐organizational study. J. Organ. Behav. 11(6):479–492.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas DA (1993) Racial dynamics in cross-race developmental relationships. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38(2):169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomas DA, Gabarro JJ (1999) Breaking Through: The Making of Minority Executives in Corporate America (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Harrington KB, Sherf EN (2022) The errors of experts: When expertise hinders effective provision and seeking of advice and feedback. Curr. Opin. Psych. 43(1):91–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Wang D, Galinsky AD (2023) Learning down to train up: Mentors are more effective when they value insights from below. Acad. Management J. 66(2):604–637.Crossref, Google Scholar