Is Competition Only One Click Away? The Digital Markets Act’s Impact on Google Maps
References
- (2003) The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(1):113–132.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Sources of market power in web search: Evidence from a field experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 33410, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2022) Flexible demand estimation with search data. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16933, CEPR, Paris.Google Scholar
- Hybrid platform model: Monopolistic competition and a dominant firm. RAND J. Econom. 55:684–718.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) Synthetic difference-in-differences. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111(12):4088–4118.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The impact of aggregators on internet news consumption. NBER Working Paper No. 28746, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2016) What’s in a name? Measuring prominence and its impact on organic traffic from search engines. Inform. Econom. Policy 34:44–57.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Streaming platform and strategic recommendation bias. J. Econom. Management Strategy 31(1):25–47.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: Evidence from Google Trends. J. Public Econom. 193:104346.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2016) Zooming in on choice: How do consumers search for cameras online? Marketing Sci. 35(5):693–712.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) The EU Digital Markets Act. Technical report, Joint Research Centre, Seville, Spain.Google Scholar
- (2023) Do search engines increase concentration in media markets? CESifo working paper, CESifo, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- (2017) Antitrust: Commission fines Google €2.42 billion for abusing dominance as search engine by giving illegal advantage to own comparison shopping service. Eur. Commission (June 26), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_17_1784.Google Scholar
- (2010) Why tie a product consumers do not use? Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 2(3):85–105.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Vertical integration and antitrust in search markets. J. Law Econom. Organ. 33(4):653–685.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2017) Content aggregation by platforms: The case of the news media. J. Econom. Management Strategy 26(4):782–805.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Competition for the digital era. Technical report, European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
- (2023) Regulating online search in the EU: From the Android case to the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. 90:102983.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Competition and defaults in online search. Amer. Econom. J. Microeconomics 17(3):369–414. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) A model of biased intermediation. RAND J. Econom. 50(4):854–882.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2013) The dynamic effects of bundling as a product strategy. Marketing Sci. 32(6):827–859.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Implementing the DMA: Substantive and Procedural Principles (Centre on Regulation in Europe, Brussels).Google Scholar
- (2025) Selling subscriptions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 115(5):1650–1671. Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Armstrong M, Porter R, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1967–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Self-preferencing at Amazon: Evidence from search rankings. AEA Papers Proc. 113:239–243.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Consumer protection for online markets and large digital platforms. Yale J. Regulation 40(3):875–914.Google Scholar
- (2021) Web trends: A valuable tool for business research. J. Bus. Res. 132:666–679.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2024) Regulating privacy online: An economic evaluation of the GDPR. Amer. Econom. J. Econom. Policy 16(1):325–358.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) Regulation and online advertising markets. Mizik N, Hanssens DM, eds. Handbook of Marketing Analytics (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 511–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) The welfare consequences of regulating Amazon. Working paper, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
- (2011) Why do intermediaries divert search? RAND J. Econom. 42(2):337–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Should platforms be allowed to sell on their own marketplaces? RAND J. Econom. 53(2):297–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Being in the right place: A natural field experiment on the causes of position effects in individual choice. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 194:24–40.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2009) Google makes a case that it isn’t so big. New York Times (June 29), https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/technology/companies/29google.html.Google Scholar
- (2024) Consumer search: What can we learn from pre-purchase data? J. Retailing 100(1):114–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Competition through commissions and kickbacks. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(2):780–809.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Economic research on privacy regulation: Lessons from the GDPR and beyond. NBER Working Paper No. 30705, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2023) Privacy and market concentration: Intended and unintended consequences of the GDPR. Management Sci. 69(10):5695–5721.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Product quality and entering through tying: Experimental evidence. Management Sci. 65(2):596–603.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Platform search design and market power. Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- (2021) Entry into two-sided markets shaped by platform-guided search. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
- (2024) Economic consequences of online tracking restrictions: Evidence from cookies. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 41(2):241–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Sophisticated consumers with inertia: Long-term implications from a large-scale field experiment. Preprint, submitted March 25, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4065098.Google Scholar
- (2010) Optimal bundling of technological products with network externality. Management Sci. 56(12):2224–2236.Link, Google Scholar
- (2022) Steering in one click: Platform self-preferencing in the Amazon Buy Box. Working paper, Federal Trade Commission Location, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- (2023) A framework for detection, measurement, and welfare analysis of platform bias. NBER Working Paper No. 31766, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2020) The effect of links and excerpts on internet news consumption. J. Marketing Res. 57(3):395–421.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms: Final report. Technical report, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, University of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (2019) Digital data, platforms and the usual [antitrust] suspects: Network effects, switching costs, essential facility. Rev. Indust. Organ. 54(4):683–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2018) The power of rankings: Quantifying the effect of rankings on online consumer search and purchase decisions. Marketing Sci. 37(4):530–552.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Search gaps and consumer fatigue. Marketing Sci. 42(1):110–136.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Amazon self-preferencing in the shadow of the Digital Markets Act. NBER Working Paper No. 32299, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- (2022) Platform encroachment and own-content bias. J. Indust. Econom. 70(3):684–710.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Product discovery and consumer search routes: Evidence from a mobile app. Preprint, submitted May 19, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4444774.Google Scholar

